Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

53 EFFECT OF THE NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING TIME ON IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF EQUINE AGGREGATED CLONED EMBRYOS

R. Olivera A , C. Alvarez A , I. Stumpo A and G. Vichera A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A KHEIRON S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina;

B Universidad de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 25(1) 174-174 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv25n1Ab53
Published: 4 December 2012

Abstract

The time allowed for nuclear reprogramming is considered an essential factor for the efficiency of cloning and has not been evaluated in equine aggregated cloned embryos. The aim of our work was to assess the effect of different timing of activation stimulus after fusion of adult equine fibroblast cells to enucleated equine oocytes on embryo development and embryo quality. We processed a total of 1874 equine ovaries, recovering 3948 oocytes, of which 1914 (48.5%) had extruded the first polar body after 24 h of maturation. Oocyte collection, maturation, and the NT procedure were performed as described by Lagutina et al. (2007 Theriogenology 67, 90–98). Reconstructed oocytes (RO) were activated at 3 different times after cell fusion: (1) 1 h, (2) 1.5 h, and (3) 2 h. Activation was performed using 8.7 µM ionomycin for 4 min, followed by a 4-h culture in a combination of 1 mM DMAP and 5 mg mL–1 of cycloheximide. The RO were cultured in the well of the well system, aggregating 3 RO per well. The RO were cultured in DMEM-F12 with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics. Cleavage (48 h after activation), blastocyst, and expanded blastocyst rates (8–9 days) were assessed. In vitro development was compared using the chi-square test (P < 0.05). A total of 1608 RO were cultured. Cleavage was significantly lower in group 3 with respect to the other 2 groups [(1): 396/450, 88%; (2): 540/639, 84.5%; (3): 365/519, 70.3%]. There were no significant differences in blastocyst rates within the 3 groups considering the number of total RO [(1): 19/450, 4.2%; (2): 23/639, 3.6%; (3): 15/519, 2.9%] or aggregated RO per well [(1): 12.7%; (2): 10.8%; (3): 8.7%]. However, the rate of blastocyst expansion was higher (P < 0.05) in group 2 than in group 3 [(1): 17/19, 89.5%; (2): 23/23, 100%; (3): 11/15, 73.3%]. In conclusion, the timing of nuclear reprogramming did not affect blastocyst rates but affected cleavage rates and blastocyst quality. This indicates that 1 h before activation stimulus is enough for embryo development of equine aggregated cloned embryos.