Rapid wind–terrain correction for wildfire simulations
James Hilton
A B and Nikhil Garg A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Data61, CSIRO, Clayton South, Vic. 3169, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: james.hilton@csiro.au
International Journal of Wildland Fire 30(6) 410-427 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20062
Submitted: 23 April 2020 Accepted: 29 March 2021 Published: 27 April 2021
Abstract
Modelling the propagation of wildfires requires an accurate wind field to correctly predict the behaviour of the fire. Although numerical weather prediction models produce reliable and accurate mesoscale forecasts, these are typically either available at a spatial resolution many times greater than the typical resolution of a wildfire model or a spot forecast that must be spatially interpolated to the area of the modelled wildfire. Due to this, these forecasts may not account for fine-scale terrain interactions with the wind and must be downscaled to a higher spatial resolution before use in a wildfire model. These downscaling methods are typically computationally intensive, limiting their use for situations where rapid predictions are required. Despite this, a three-dimensional mass balancing method is commonly used in wildfire prediction as a preprocessing step. In this study we show that this mass balancing method can be reduced to a two-dimensional approach, greatly reducing the complexity and computational time required for the model. The two-dimensional method is compared with the existing three-dimensional method and experimentally measured datasets. Furthermore, a combination of rapid numerical solution techniques and modern computational processors allow these wind–terrain correction methods to be directly incorporated into wildfire propagation models.
Keywords: fire modelling, spark, terrain, wind.
References
Adcroft A, Hill C, Marshall J (1997) Representation of topography by shaved cells in a height coordinate ocean model. Monthly Weather Review 125, 2293–2315.| Representation of topography by shaved cells in a height coordinate ocean model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berg J, Mann J, Bechmann A, Courtney MS, Jorgensen HE (2011) The Bolund Experiment, Part I: Flow Over a Steep, Three-Dimensional Hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 141, 219–243.
| The Bolund Experiment, Part I: Flow Over a Steep, Three-Dimensional Hill.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Butler BW, Wagenbrenner NS, Forthofer JM, Lamb BK, Shannon KS, Finn D, Eckman RM, Clawson K, Bradshaw L, Sopko P, Beard S, Jimenez D, Wold C, Vosburgh M (2015) High-resolution observations of the near-surface wind field over an isolated mountain and in a steep river canyon. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15, 3785–3801.
| High-resolution observations of the near-surface wind field over an isolated mountain and in a steep river canyon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Anderson WR (2012) Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 280, 120–131.
| Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chorin AJ (1968) Numerical Solution of Navier-Stokes Equations. Mathematics of Computation 22, 745–762.
| Numerical Solution of Navier-Stokes Equations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Conan B, Chaudhari A, Aubrun S, van Beeck J, Hamalainen J, Hellsten A (2016) Experimental and Numerical Modelling of Flow over Complex Terrain: The Bolund Hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 158, 183–208.
| Experimental and Numerical Modelling of Flow over Complex Terrain: The Bolund Hill.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cruz MG, Gould JS, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, McCaw WL, Matthews S (2015) ‘A Guide to Rate of Fire Spread Models for Australian Vegetation.’ (Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council Ltd (AFAC): Melbourne)
Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator - Model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT, USA)
Finney MA (2006) An Overview of FlamMap Fire Modeling Capabilities. In ‘Fuels Management – How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings’, 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Eds PL Andrews, BW Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 213–220. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)
Forthofer JM, Butler BW, McHugh CW, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS, Stratton RD, Shannon KS, Wagenbrenner NS (2014a) A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part II. An exploratory study of the effect of simulated winds on fire growth simulations. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 982–994.
| A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part II. An exploratory study of the effect of simulated winds on fire growth simulations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forthofer JM, Butler BW, Wagenbrenner NS (2014b) A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part I. Model formulation and comparison against measurements. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 969–981.
| A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part I. Model formulation and comparison against measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP (2011) Quantifying fine fuel dynamics and structure in dry eucalypt forest (Eucalyptus marginata) in Western Australia for fire management. Forest Ecology and Management 262, 531–546.
| Quantifying fine fuel dynamics and structure in dry eucalypt forest (Eucalyptus marginata) in Western Australia for fire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guo X, Palutikof JP (1990) A Study of 2 Mass-Consistent Models - Problems and Possible Solutions. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 53, 303–332.
| A Study of 2 Mass-Consistent Models - Problems and Possible Solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hahmann AN, Vincent CL, Pena A, Lange J, Hasager CB (2015) Wind climate estimation using WRF model output: method and model sensitivities over the sea. International Journal of Climatology 35, 3422–3439.
| Wind climate estimation using WRF model output: method and model sensitivities over the sea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hilton JE, Miller C, Sullivan AL, Rucinski C (2015) Effects of spatial and temporal variation in environmental conditions on simulation of wildfire spread. Environmental Modelling & Software 67, 118–127.
| Effects of spatial and temporal variation in environmental conditions on simulation of wildfire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hilton JE, Miller C, Sullivan AL (2016) A power series formulation for two-dimensional wildfire shapes. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 970–979.
| A power series formulation for two-dimensional wildfire shapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hilton JE, Sharples JJ, Sullivan AL, Swedosh W (2017) Simulation of spot fire coalescence with dynamic feedback. In ‘MODSIM 2017 Proceedings’. (Eds G Syme, D Hatton MacDonald, B Fulton, J Piantadosi) pp. 1111–1117. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand: Hobart)
Hilton JE, Sullivan AL, Swedosh W, Sharples J, Thomas C (2018) Incorporating convective feedback in wildfire simulations using pyrogenic potential. Environmental Modelling & Software 107, 12–24.
| Incorporating convective feedback in wildfire simulations using pyrogenic potential.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Homicz GF (2002) ‘Three-Dimensional Wind Field Modeling: A Review.’ (University of North Texas: Albuquerque, NM)
Jackson PS, Hunt JCR (1975) Turbulent Wind Flow over a Low Hill. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 101, 929–955.
| Turbulent Wind Flow over a Low Hill.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kitada T, Kaki A, Ueda H, Peters LK (1983) Estimation of Vertical Air Motion from Limited Horizontal Wind Data - A Numerical Experiment. Atmospheric Environment 17, 2181–2192.
| Estimation of Vertical Air Motion from Limited Horizontal Wind Data - A Numerical Experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lalas DP (1985) Wind Energy Estimation and Siting in Complex Terrain. International Journal of Solar Energy 3, 43–71.
| Wind Energy Estimation and Siting in Complex Terrain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liu YB, Warner T, Liu YW, Vincent C, Wu WL, Mahoney B, Swerdlin S, Parks K, Boehnert J (2011) Simultaneous nested modeling from the synoptic scale to the LES scale for wind energy applications. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 99, 308–319.
| Simultaneous nested modeling from the synoptic scale to the LES scale for wind energy applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lopes AMG, Cruz MG, Viegas DX (2002) FireStation - an integrated software system for the numerical simulation of fire spread on complex topography. Environmental Modelling & Software 17, 269–285.
| FireStation - an integrated software system for the numerical simulation of fire spread on complex topography.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lundquist KA, Chow FK, Lundquist JK (2010) An Immersed Boundary Method for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model. Monthly Weather Review 138, 796–817.
| An Immersed Boundary Method for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matthews S, Gould J, McCaw L (2010) Simple models for predicting dead fuel moisture in eucalyptus forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 459–467.
| Simple models for predicting dead fuel moisture in eucalyptus forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGrattan K (2017). Fire Dynamics Simulator. Available at https://github.com/firemodels/fds/tree/master/Validation/Askervein_Hill/FDS_Input_Files
Miller C, Hilton J, Sullivan A, Prakash M (2015). ‘SPARK – A Bushfire Spread Prediction Tool.’ (Springer International Publishing: Cham)
Pielke RA (2013). ‘Mesoscale meteorological modeling.’ (Elsevier/Academic Press: Amsterdam)
Plucinski MP, Sullivan AL, Rucinski CJ, Prakash M (2017) Improving the reliability and utility of operational bushfire behaviour predictions in Australian vegetation. Environmental Modelling & Software 91, 1–12.
| Improving the reliability and utility of operational bushfire behaviour predictions in Australian vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rios O, Jahn W, Pastor E, Valero MM, Planas E (2018) Interpolation framework to speed up near-surface wind simulations for data-driven wildfire applications. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 257–270.
| Interpolation framework to speed up near-surface wind simulations for data-driven wildfire applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodrigo JS, Arroyo RAC, Moriarty P, Churchfield M, Kosovic B, Rethore PE, Hansen KS, Hahmann A, Mirocha JD, Rife D (2017) Mesoscale to microscale wind farm flow modeling and evaluation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Energy and Environment 6, e214
| Mesoscale to microscale wind farm flow modeling and evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ross DG, Smith IN, Manins PC, Fox DG (1988) Diagnostic Wind-Field Modeling for Complex Terrain - Model Development and Testing. Journal of Applied Meteorology 27, 785–796.
| Diagnostic Wind-Field Modeling for Complex Terrain - Model Development and Testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sethian JA (1999) Fast marching methods. SIAM Review 41, 199–235.
| Fast marching methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sethian JA (2001) Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts. Journal of Computational Physics 169, 503–555.
| Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharples JJ, Hilton JE (2020) Modeling Vorticity-Driven Wildfire Behavior Using Near-Field Techniques. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering 5, 69
| Modeling Vorticity-Driven Wildfire Behavior Using Near-Field Techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharples JJ, McRae RHD, Wilkes SR (2012) Wind-terrain effects on the propagation of wildfires in rugged terrain: fire channelling. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 282–296.
| Wind-terrain effects on the propagation of wildfires in rugged terrain: fire channelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shaw J, Weller H (2016) Comparison of Terrain-Following and Cut-Cell Grids Using a Nonhydrostatic Model. Monthly Weather Review 144, 2085–2099.
| Comparison of Terrain-Following and Cut-Cell Grids Using a Nonhydrostatic Model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sherman CA (1978) Mass-Consistent Model for Wind Fields over Complex Terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 17, 312–319.
| Mass-Consistent Model for Wind Fields over Complex Terrain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang X-Y, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113. (UCAR: Boulder CO)
Sullivan AL (2017) Inside the Inferno: Fundamental Processes of Wildland Fire Behaviour. Current Forestry Reports 3, 150–171.
| Inside the Inferno: Fundamental Processes of Wildland Fire Behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sullivan AL, Sharples JJ, Matthews S, Plucinski MP (2014) A downslope fire spread correction factor based on landscape-scale fire behaviour. Environmental Modelling & Software 62, 153–163.
| A downslope fire spread correction factor based on landscape-scale fire behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor PA, Teunissen HW (1987) The Askervein Hill Project - Overview and Background Data. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 39, 15–39.
| The Askervein Hill Project - Overview and Background Data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tolhurst K, Shields B, Chong D (2008) Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 47–54.
Wagenbrenner NS, Forthofer JM, Lamb BK, Shannon KS, Butler BW (2016) Downscaling surface wind predictions from numerical weather prediction models in complex terrain with WindNinja. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16, 5229–5241.
| Downscaling surface wind predictions from numerical weather prediction models in complex terrain with WindNinja.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wang YS, Williamson C, Garvey D, Chang S, Cogan J (2005) Application of a multigrid method to a mass-consistent diagnostic wind model. Journal of Applied Meteorology 44, 1078–1089.
| Application of a multigrid method to a mass-consistent diagnostic wind model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wesseling P (1992) ‘An introduction to multigrid methods.’ (Wiley: Chichester)
Zajaczkowski FJ, Haupt SE, Schmehl KJ (2011) A preliminary study of assimilating numerical weather prediction data into computational fluid dynamics models for wind prediction. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 99, 320–329.
| A preliminary study of assimilating numerical weather prediction data into computational fluid dynamics models for wind prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
