Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Modelling chamise fuel moisture content across California: a machine learning approach

Scott B. Capps A C , Wei Zhuang A , Rui Liu A , Tom Rolinski B and Xin Qu A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Atmospheric Data Solutions, LLC, 15275 South Wagon Road, #59, Jackson, WY 83001, USA.

B Southern California Edison, 6000 Irwindale Avenue, Irwindale, CA 91702, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: scapps@atmosdatasolutions.com

International Journal of Wildland Fire 31(2) 136-148 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21061
Submitted: 11 May 2021  Accepted: 23 November 2021   Published: 9 December 2021

Journal Compilation © IAWF 2022 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Live fuel moisture content plays a significant and complex role in wildfire propagation. However, in situ historical and near real-time live fuel moisture measurements are temporally and spatially sparse within wildfire-prone regions. Routine bi-weekly sampling intervals are sometimes exceeded if the weather is unfavourable and/or field personnel are unavailable. To fill these spatial and temporal gaps, we have developed a daily gridded chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) live fuel moisture product that can be used, in conjunction with other predictors, to assess current and historical wildfire danger/behaviour. Chamise observations for 52 new- and 41 old-growth California sites from the National Fuel Moisture Database were statistically related to dynamically downscaled high-resolution weather predictors using a random forest machine learning model. This model captures reasonably well the temporal and spatial variability of chamise live fuel moisture content within California. Compared with observations, model-predicted live fuel moisture values have an overall R2, root mean squared error (RMSE) and bias of 0.79, 15.34% and 0.26%, respectively, for new growth and 0.63, 8.81% and 0.11% for old growth. Given the success of the model, we have begun to use it to produce daily forecasts of chamise live fuel moisture content for California utilities.

Keywords: Adenostoma, chamise, live fuel moisture content, new growth, old growth, wildfire, machine learning, California, live fuel moisture, numerical weather modelling, WRF, random forest, LFMC.


References

ASOS (Automated Surface Observation System) (1998) Automated surface observation system users guide. Available at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/asos/pdfs/aum-toc.pdf [Verified 23 November 2021]

Castro FX, Tudela A, Sebastià MT (2003) Modeling moisture content in shrubs to predict fire risk in Catalonia (Spain). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 116, 49–59.
Modeling moisture content in shrubs to predict fire risk in Catalonia (Spain).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chou MD, Suarez MJ (1999) A solar radiation parameterization (CLIRAD-SW) developed at Goddard Climate and Radiation Branch for atmospheric studies. NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA/TM-1999–104606.

Chuvieco E (2003) ‘Wildland fire danger estimation and mapping: the role of remote sensing data.’ (World Scientific Publishing: Singapore)

Chuvieco E, Cocero D, Riaño D, Martín MP, Martínez-Vega J, De La Riva J, Pérez F (2004) Combining NDVI and surface temperature for the estimation of live fuel moisture content in forest fire danger rating. Remote Sensing of Environment 92, 322–331.
Combining NDVI and surface temperature for the estimation of live fuel moisture content in forest fire danger rating.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Countryman CM, Dean WH (1979) Measuring moisture content in living chaparral: a field user’s manual. USDA, Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PSW-36. (Berkeley, CA, USA)

Danson FM, Bowyer P (2004) Estimating live fuel moisture content from remotely sensed reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 92, 309–321.
Estimating live fuel moisture content from remotely sensed reflectance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dennison PE, Moritz MA (2009) Critical live fuel moisture in chaparral ecosystems: a threshold for fire activity and its relationship to antecedent precipitation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 1021–1027.
Critical live fuel moisture in chaparral ecosystems: a threshold for fire activity and its relationship to antecedent precipitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dennison PE, Moritz MA, Taylor RS (2008) Evaluating predictive models of critical live fuel moisture in the Santa Monica Mountains, California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 18–27.
Evaluating predictive models of critical live fuel moisture in the Santa Monica Mountains, California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dimitrakopoulos AP, Bemmerzouk AM (2003) Predicting live herbaceous moisture content from a seasonal drought index. International Journal of Biometeorology 47, 73–79.
Predicting live herbaceous moisture content from a seasonal drought index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12647093PubMed |

Dimitrakopoulos AP, Papaioannou KK (2001) Flammability assessment of Mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technology 37, 143–152.
Flammability assessment of Mediterranean forest fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doyle JD, Gaberšek S, Jiang Q, Bernardet L, Brown JM, Dörnbrack A, Filaus E, Grubišić V, Kirshbaum DJ, Knoth O, Koch S, Schmidli J, Stiperski I, Vosper SB, Zhong S (2011) An intercomparison of T-REX mountain-wave simulations and implications for mesoscale predictability. Monthly Weather Review 139, 2811–2831.
An intercomparison of T-REX mountain-wave simulations and implications for mesoscale predictability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

García M, Riaño D, Yebra M, Salas J, Cardil A, Monedero S, Ramirez J, Martín MP, Vilar L, Gajardo J, Ustin S (2020) Live fuel moisture content product from Landsat TM satellite time series for implementation in fire behavior models. Remote Sensing 12, 1714
Live fuel moisture content product from Landsat TM satellite time series for implementation in fire behavior models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holden ZA, Jolly WM (2011) Modeling topographic influences on fuel moisture and fire danger in complex terrain to improve wildland fire management decision support. Forest Ecology and Management 262, 2133–2141.
Modeling topographic influences on fuel moisture and fire danger in complex terrain to improve wildland fire management decision support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jain P, Coogan SCP, Subramanian SG, Crowley M, Taylor S, Flannigan MD (2020) A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environmental Reviews 28, 478–505.
A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jurdao S, Chuvieco E, Arevalillo JM (2012) Modelling fire ignition probability from satellite estimates of live fuel moisture content. Fire Ecology 8, 77–97.
Modelling fire ignition probability from satellite estimates of live fuel moisture content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kain JS (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43, 170–181.
The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeley JE, Safford H, Fotheringham CJ, Franklin J, Moritz M (2009) The 2007 southern California wildfires: lessons in complexity. Journal of Forestry 107, 287–296.

LANDFIRE (2008) Existing Vegetation Type Layer, LANDFIRE 1.1.0, US Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, and US Department of Agriculture. Available at http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/ [Verified 29 November 2021]

McCandless TC, Kosovic B, Petzke W (2020) Enhancing wildfire spread modelling by building a gridded fuel moisture content product with machine learning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology 1, 035010

Michael Y, Helman D, Glickman O, Gabay D, Brenner S, Lensky IM (2021) Forecasting fire risk with machine learning and dynamic information derived from satellite vegetation index time-series. The Science of the Total Environment 764, 142844
Forecasting fire risk with machine learning and dynamic information derived from satellite vegetation index time-series.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33158519PubMed |

Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V (2009) Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one and two-moment schemes. Monthly Weather Review 137, 991–1007.
Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one and two-moment schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Myoung B, Kim SH, Nghiem SV, Jia S, Whitney K, Kafatos MC (2018) Estimating live fuel moisture from MODIS satellite data for wildfire danger assessment in Southern California USA. Remote Sensing 10, 87
Estimating live fuel moisture from MODIS satellite data for wildfire danger assessment in Southern California USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nakanishi M, Niino H (2006) An improved Mellor–Yamada Level 3 Model: its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 119, 397–407.
An improved Mellor–Yamada Level 3 Model: its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Niu G-Y, Yang Z-L, Mitchell KE, Chen F, Ek MB, Barlage M, Kumar A, Manning K, Niyogi D, Rosero E, Tewari M, Xia Y (2011) The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, D12109
The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nolan RH, Boer MM, Resco de Dios V, Caccamo G, Bradstock RA (2016) Large-scale, dynamic transformations in fuel moisture drive wildfire activity across southeastern Australia. Geophysical Research Letters 43, 4229–4238.
Large-scale, dynamic transformations in fuel moisture drive wildfire activity across southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pellizzaro G, Cesaraccio C, Duce P, Ventura A, Zara P (2007) Relationships between seasonal patterns of live fuel moisture and meteorological drought indices for Mediterranean shrubland species. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 232–241.
Relationships between seasonal patterns of live fuel moisture and meteorological drought indices for Mediterranean shrubland species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peterson SH, Roberts DA, Dennison PE (2008) Mapping live fuel moisture with MODIS data: a multiple regression approach. Remote Sensing of Environment 112, 4272–4284.
Mapping live fuel moisture with MODIS data: a multiple regression approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pivovaroff AL, Emery N, Sharifi MR, Witter M, Keeley JE, Rundel PW (2019) The effect of ecophysiological traits on live fuel moisture content. Fire 2, 28
The effect of ecophysiological traits on live fuel moisture content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Probst P, Wright MN, Boulesteix AL (2019) Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9, e1301
Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Qi Y, Dennison PE, Spencer J, Riano D (2012) Monitoring live fuel moisture using soil moisture and remote sensing proxies. Fire Ecology 8, 71–87.
Monitoring live fuel moisture using soil moisture and remote sensing proxies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Qi Y, Dennison PE, Jolly WM, Kropp RC, Brewer SC (2014) Spectroscopic analysis of seasonal changes in live fuel moisture content and leaf dry mass. Remote Sensing of Environment 150, 198–206.
Spectroscopic analysis of seasonal changes in live fuel moisture content and leaf dry mass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rao K, Williams AP, Flefil JF, Konings AG (2020) SAR-enhanced mapping of live fuel moisture content Remote Sensing of Environment 245, 111797
SAR-enhanced mapping of live fuel moisture contentCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rolinski T, Capps SB, Fovell RG, Cao Y, D’Agostino BJ, Vanderburg S (2016) The Santa Ana wildfire threat index: methodology and operational implementation. Weather and Forecasting 31, 1881–1897.
The Santa Ana wildfire threat index: methodology and operational implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ruffault J, Martin-StPaul N, Piment F, Dupuy J (2018) How well do meteorological drought indices predict live fuel moisture content (LFMC)? An assessment for wildfire research and operations in Mediterranean ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 262, 391–401.
How well do meteorological drought indices predict live fuel moisture content (LFMC)? An assessment for wildfire research and operations in Mediterranean ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan HL, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Woollen J, Behringer D, Liu H (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 91, 1015–1058.
The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Serrano L, Ustin SL, Roberts DA, Gamon JA, Penuelas J (2000) Deriving water content of chaparral vegetation from AVIRIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment 74, 570–581.
Deriving water content of chaparral vegetation from AVIRIS data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Liu Z, Berner J, Huang XY (2019) A description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4 (No. NCAR/TN-556+STR) (National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, USA).

Viegas DX, Piñol J, Viegas MT, Ogaya R (2001) Estimating live fine fuels moisture content using meteorologically-based indices. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 223–240.
Estimating live fine fuels moisture content using meteorologically-based indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yebra M, Chuvieco E, Riaño D (2008) Estimation of live fuel moisture content from MODIS images for fire risk assessment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 523–536.
Estimation of live fuel moisture content from MODIS images for fire risk assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yebra M, Dennison PE, Chuvieco E, Riano D, Zylstra P, Hunt ER, Danson FM, Qi Y, Jurdao S (2013) A global review of remote sensing of live fuel moisture content for fire danger assessment: moving towards operational products. Remote Sensing of Environment 136, 455–468.
A global review of remote sensing of live fuel moisture content for fire danger assessment: moving towards operational products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yebra M, Quan X, Riaño D, Larraondo PR, van Dijk AIJM, Cary GJ (2018) A fuel moisture content and flammability monitoring methodology for continental Australia based on optical remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 212, 260–272.
A fuel moisture content and flammability monitoring methodology for continental Australia based on optical remote sensing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zachariassen J, Zeller KF, Nikolov N, McClelland T (2003) A review of the Forest Service Remote Automated Weather Station (RAWS) network. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-119. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)