Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Bandicoot bunkers: training wild-caught northern brown bandicoots (Isoodon macrourus) to use microchip-automated safe refuge

M. C. Edwards https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-1942 A B C , J. M. Hoy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6337-5761 B , S. I. FitzGibbon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-5738 A and P. J. Murray https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-1706 A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, Warrego Highway, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.

B Hidden Vale Wildlife Centre, The University of Queensland, 617 Grandchester Mount Mort Road, Grandchester, Qld 4340, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: megan.edwards@uqconnect.edu.au

Wildlife Research 47(3) 239-243 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19151
Submitted: 24 August 2019  Accepted: 7 November 2019   Published: 15 April 2020

Abstract

Context: Soft-release involving supplementary feeding or shelter is commonly used in wildlife reintroduction and rehabilitation projects. However, competition for nestboxes and supplementary feed, as well as predation at feed stations or nestboxes, can reduce the benefits of soft-release. The use of microchip-automated technology can potentially alleviate these concerns, by providing targeted supplementation to only the intended, microchipped animals.

Aims: We aimed to train wild-caught northern brown bandicoots, Isoodon macrourus, to use microchip-automated doors to access safe refuge.

Methods: Bandicoots were trapped from the wild and brought to the Hidden Vale Wildlife Centre, where eight were trained to use the doors in a six-stage process, and then six were trained in a three-stage process, using a peanut butter reward.

Key results: Bandicoots learned to use the doors in as few as 3 days. The duration of visits to the door generally increased during training, although the number of visits decreased.

Conclusions: The bandicoots successfully learned to use the microchip-automated doors, which shows that this technology has great potential with wildlife, particularly given the short training times required.

Implications: The use of these microchip-automated doors with wildlife has many potential applications, including supplementary feeding stations, nestboxes, monitoring in the wild, as well as enrichment for wild animals in captivity.

Additional keywords: behaviour, captive management, wildlife management.


References

Bannister, H., Lynch, C., and Moseby, K. E. (2016). Predator swamping and supplementary feeding do not improve reintroduction success for a threatened Australian mammal, Bettongia lesueur. Australian Mammalogy 38, 177–187.
Predator swamping and supplementary feeding do not improve reintroduction success for a threatened Australian mammal, Bettongia lesueur.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beyer, G., and Goldingay, R. (2006). The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials. Wildlife Research 33, 161–174.
The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boutin, S. (1990). Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems and the future. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 203–220.
Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems and the future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bradley, C., and Altizer, S. (2007). Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 95–102.
Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Butler, K., Paton, D., and Moseby, K. E. (2018). One-way gates successfully facilitate the movement of burrowing bettongs (Bettongia lesueur) through exclusion fences around the reserve. Austral Ecology , .
One-way gates successfully facilitate the movement of burrowing bettongs (Bettongia lesueur) through exclusion fences around the reserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Charter, M., Izhaki, I., Mocha, Y., and Kark, S. (2016). Nest-site competition between invasive and native cavity nesting birds and its implication for conservation. Journal of Environmental Management 181, 129–134.
Nest-site competition between invasive and native cavity nesting birds and its implication for conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27341373PubMed |

de Milliano, J., Di Stefano, J., Courtney, P., Temple-Smith, P., and Coulson, G. (2016). Soft-release versus hard-release for reintroduction of an endangered species: an experimental comparison using eastern barred bandicoots (Perameles gunnii). Wildlife Research 43, 1–12.
Soft-release versus hard-release for reintroduction of an endangered species: an experimental comparison using eastern barred bandicoots (Perameles gunnii).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doherty, T. S., Davis, R., Van Etten, E., Algar, D., Collier, N., Dickman, C. R., Edwards, G., Masters, P., Palmer, R., and Robinson, S. (2015). A continental-scale analysis of feral cat diet in Australia. Journal of Biogeography 42, 964–975.
A continental-scale analysis of feral cat diet in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drew, M., Hartnoll, R., and Hansson, B. (2012). An improved mark-recapture method using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in Birgus latro (Linnaeus, 1767) (Decapoda, Anomura). Crustaceana 85, 89–102.
An improved mark-recapture method using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in Birgus latro (Linnaeus, 1767) (Decapoda, Anomura).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunn, E., and Tessaglia, D. (1994). Predation at birds at feeders in winter. Journal of Field Ornithology 65, 8–16.

Edwards, M. C., Hoy, J. M., FitzGibbon, S., and Murray, P. J. (2019). Training a wild-born marsupial to use microchip-automated devices: the brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) as proof of concept. Australian Mammalogy 41, 279–282.
Training a wild-born marsupial to use microchip-automated devices: the brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) as proof of concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Evans, M., Lank, D., Boyd, W., and Cooke, F. (2002). A comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s goldeneye and bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. The Condor 104, 610–619.
A comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s goldeneye and bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldingay, R., Rueegger, N., Grimson, M., and Taylor, B. (2015). Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity-dependent arboreal mammals. Restoration Ecology 23, 482–490.
Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity-dependent arboreal mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gordon, G. (2008). Northern brown bandicoot. In ‘The Mammals of Australia’. (Eds S. Van Dyck, and R. Strahan) pp. 178–180. (Reed New Holland: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)

Hanmer, H., Thomas, R., and Fellowes, M. (2018). Introduced grey squirrels subvert supplementary feeding of suburban wild birds. Landscape and Urban Planning 177, 10–18.
Introduced grey squirrels subvert supplementary feeding of suburban wild birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hoy, J. M. (2010) ‘Microchip-automated Husbandry as Enrichment for Captive Animals.’ (The University of Queensland: Brisbane, Qld, Australia.)

Hoy, J. M., Murray, P. J., and Tribe, A. (2010). The potential for microchip-automated technology to improve enrichment practices. Zoo Biology 29, 586–599.
The potential for microchip-automated technology to improve enrichment practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20024962PubMed |

Isaac, J., Johnson, C. N., Grabau, P., and Krockenberger, A. (2004). Automated feeders: new technology for food supplementation experiments with mammals. Wildlife Research 31, 437–441.
Automated feeders: new technology for food supplementation experiments with mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D., Welsh, A., Donnelly, C., Crane, M., Michael, D., Macgregor, C., McBurney, L., Montague-Drake, R., and Gibbons, P. (2009). Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition. Biological Conservation 142, 33–42.
Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lunney, D., Dickman, C. R., and Woinarski, J. (2016). ‘Isoodon macrourus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/summary/40552/0 [verified December 2018].

McComb, L., Lentini, P., Harley, D., Lumsden, L., Antrobus, J., Eyre, A., and Briscoe, N. (2019). Feral cat predation on Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri) and observations of arboreal hunting at nest boxes. Australian Mammalogy 41, 262–265.
Feral cat predation on Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri) and observations of arboreal hunting at nest boxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller, K. (2002). Nesting success of the great crested flycatcher in nest boxes and in tree cavities: are nest boxes safer from nest predation? The Wilson Bulletin 114, 179–185.
Nesting success of the great crested flycatcher in nest boxes and in tree cavities: are nest boxes safer from nest predation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mitchell, A., Wellicome, T., Brodie, D., and Cheng, K. (2011). Captive-reared burrowing owls show higher site-affinity, survival, and reproductive performance when reintroduced using a soft-release. Biological Conservation 144, 1382–1391.
Captive-reared burrowing owls show higher site-affinity, survival, and reproductive performance when reintroduced using a soft-release.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muns, S., Hoy, J., and Murray, P. J. (2018). Microchips for macropods: first use of a microchip-automated door by a bridled nailtail wallaby (Onychogalea fraenata). Zoo Biology 37, 274–278.
Microchips for macropods: first use of a microchip-automated door by a bridled nailtail wallaby (Onychogalea fraenata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rickett, J., Dey, C., Stothart, J., O’Connor, C., Quinn, J., and Ji, W. (2013). The influence of supplemental feeding on survival, dispersal and competition in translocated brown teal, or pateke (Anas chlorotis). Emu - Austral Ornithology 113, 62–68.
The influence of supplemental feeding on survival, dispersal and competition in translocated brown teal, or pateke (Anas chlorotis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winnard, A. L., and Coulson, G. (2008). Sixteen years of eastern barred bandicoot Perameles gunnii reintroductions in Victoria: a review. Pacific Conservation Biology 14, 34–53.
Sixteen years of eastern barred bandicoot Perameles gunnii reintroductions in Victoria: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |