Foam placement for soil remediationHenri Bertin A C , Estefania Del Campo Estrada A and Olivier Atteia B
A Institut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie (I2M), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Bordeaux, France.
B Géoressources et Environnement-ENSEGID, Bordeaux INP, France.
C Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Environmental Chemistry 14(5) 338-343 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN17003
Submitted: 4 January 2017 Accepted: 6 June 2017 Published: 28 June 2017
Abstract. Foam can be generated in porous media, mainly by snap-off phenomena, by co-injecting gas and a surfactant solution. The liquid films that separate the gas bubbles, called lamellae, and gas trapping in small pores where capillary pressure is high generate a resistance to flow that drastically decreases fluid mobilities in porous media. Experiments performed with a 2D laboratory pilot consisting of two layers with different properties clearly highlight that foam is generated in the high-permeability layer and will divert flow towards the low-permeability region. This behaviour is of great interest for the remediation of heterogeneous polluted soils.
References O. Atteia, E. Del Campo Estrada, H. Bertin, Soil flushing: a review of the origin of efficiency variability. Rev. Enviro. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2013, 12, 379.
| Soil flushing: a review of the origin of efficiency variability.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVGnur%2FJ&md5=9c8a2a8fc17ee770cba9c0bd7e1bc06fCAS |
 R. S. Seright, Improved Techniques for Fluid Diversion in Oil Recovery. Final Report (DOE/BC/14880–15), Contract No. DE-AC22–92BC14880 1995 (US Department of Energy). Available at https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc667143/m2/1/high_res_d/188919.pdf [Verified 15 June 2017].
 H. J. Bertin, O. Apaydin, L. Castanier, A. R. Kovscek, Foam flow in heterogeneous porous media: effect of cross flow. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 1999, 4, 75.
 A. Kovscek, H. Bertin, Foam mobility in heterogeneous porous media I: scaling concepts. Transp. Porous Media 2003, 52, 17.
| Foam mobility in heterogeneous porous media I: scaling concepts.CrossRef |
 A. Kovscek, H. Bertin, Foam mobility in heterogeneous porous media II: experimental observations. Transp. Porous Media 2003, 52, 37.
| Foam mobility in heterogeneous porous media II: experimental observations.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtFCrurc%3D&md5=e805bb9c77b343c4af0e4f0ca52b377bCAS |
 G. J. Hirasaki, The steam foam process. J. Pet. Technol. 1989, 41, 449.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXksVansrk%3D&md5=83c5ffe16235ac2b2776b9d7499f4409CAS |
 T. C. Ransohoff, C. J. Radke, Mechanisms of foam generation in glass bead pack. SPE Reservoir Eng. 1988, 3, 573.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXltlWkurk%3D&md5=30408a62048ee356d58381879caee65bCAS |
 G. J. Hirasaki, C. A. Miller, R. Szafranski, J. B. Lawson, N. Akiya, Surfactant/foam process for aquifer remediation, in International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, Texas, 18–21 February 1997, SPE-37257-MS (Society of Petroleum Engineers).
 J. Maire, N. Coyer, N. Fatin-Rouge, Surfactant foam technology for in situ removal of chlorinated compounds-dNAPLs. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 630.
| Surfactant foam technology for in situ removal of chlorinated compounds-dNAPLs.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXht1KlsLfM&md5=0c5dc300c3c133c1434d2121ce201775CAS |
 J. J. Kilbane, P. Chowdiah, K. J. Kayser, B. Misra, K. A. Jackowski, V. J. Srivastava, G. N. Sethu, A. D. Nikolov, D. T. Wasan, T. D. Hayes, Remediation of contaminated soils using foams. Land Contamination & Reclamation 1997, 5, 41.
 G. J. Hirasaki, R. E. Jackson, M. Jin, J. B. Lawson, J. Londergan, H. Meinardus, C. A. Miller, G. A. Pope, R. Szafranski, D. Tanzil, M. D. Annable, J. W. Jawitz, P. S. C. Rao, R. D. Rhue, T. J. Simpkin, Field demonstration of the surfactant/foam process for remediation of a heterogeneous aquifer contaminated with DNAPL, in NAPL Removal: Surfactants, Foams and Microemulsions (Eds S. Fiorenza, C. A. Miller, C. L. Oubre, C. H. Ward) 2000, pp. 1–163 (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL).
 S. Wang, C. N. Mulligan, Rhamnolipid foam enhanced remediation of cadmium and nickel contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2004, 157, 315.
| Rhamnolipid foam enhanced remediation of cadmium and nickel contaminated soil.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmvFSmtrw%3D&md5=2691e027cd7fcab7c3a32994c9b3b913CAS |
 H. Wang, J. Chen, Enhanced flushing of polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated sands using surfactant foam: effect of partition coefficient and sweep efficiency. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 1270.
| Enhanced flushing of polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated sands using surfactant foam: effect of partition coefficient and sweep efficiency.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xht1ynsb7F&md5=4db4a8ff2c05a734d1df2968417bf91bCAS |
 S. Gitipour, K. Narenjkar, E. S. Farvash, H. Asghari, Soil flushing of cresols contaminated soil: application of nonionic and ionic surfactants under different pH and concentrations. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 129.
| Soil flushing of cresols contaminated soil: application of nonionic and ionic surfactants under different pH and concentrations.CrossRef |
 A. W. Harbaugh, E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, M. G. McDonald, MODFLOW-2000, The US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model – User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process 2000 (US Geological Survey: Reston, VA).
 C. Zheng, P. P. Wang, MT3DMS: a Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User’s Guide. Alabama University report. Report SERDP-99 1999.