Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Applications and interpretation of computer-assisted sperm analyses and sperm sorting methods in assisted breeding and comparative research

William V. Holt A D , Justine O’Brien B and Teresa Abaigar C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Zoology, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

B SeaWorld and Busch Gardens Reproductive Research Center, San Diego, CA 92109-7995, USA; and Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

C Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, General Segura 1, 04001 Almería, Spain.

D Corresponding author. Email: bill.holt@ioz.ac.uk

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(6) 709-718 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD07037
Submitted: 26 February 2007  Accepted: 21 May 2007   Published: 2 August 2007

Abstract

Theoretical and practical knowledge of sperm function is an essential requirement in almost every aspect of modern reproductive technology, if the overarching objective is the eventual production of live offspring. Artificial insemination (AI) techniques depend on the availability of high quality semen, whether fresh, diluted and stored, or frozen. Assessing such semen for quality and the likelihood of fertility is therefore also important, as much time, resources and effort can easily be wasted by using poor samples. Some semen technologies are aimed not at quality assessment, but at attempting to skew the breeding outcomes. Sex preselection by separating the male- and female-bearing spermatozoa using flow cytometry is now practised routinely in the agricultural industry, but speculatively it may eventually be possible to use other genetic markers besides the sex chromosomes. A moment’s reflection shows that although sex-biasing flow cytometry technology is well developed and generally fulfils its purpose if presorting of sperm quality is adequate, other technologies aimed specifically at semen assessment are also sophisticated but provide inadequate data that say little about fertility. This is especially true of instrumentation for objective sperm motility assessment. Here we aim to examine this technological paradox and suggest that although the sperm assessment equipment might be sophisticated, the shortcomings probably lie largely with inappropriate objectives and data interpretation. We also aim to review the potential value and use of sperm sexing technology for non-domestic species, arguing in this case that the limitations also lie less with the technology itself than with the applications envisaged. Finally, the potential application of a sorting method directed at motility rather than sperm DNA content is discussed.

Additional keywords: artificial insemination, in vitro fertilisation, sex sorting, sperm selection.


References

Abaigar, T. , Holt, W. V. , Harrison, R. A. P. , and del Barrio, G. (1999). Sperm subpopulations in boar (Sus scrofa) and gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) semen as revealed by pattern analysis of computer-assisted motility assessments. Biol. Reprod. 60, 32–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Belbin L. (1993). ‘PATN Pattern Analysis Package.’ (Division of Wildlife and Ecology, CSIRO: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Davis, R. O. , and Katz, D. F. (1989). Computer-aided sperm analysis (casa): Image digitization and processing. Biomater. Artif. Cells Artif. Organs 17, 93–116.
PubMed | Gomendio M., Harcourt A. H., and Roldan E. R. S. (1998) Sperm competition in mammals. In ‘Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection’. (Eds T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Moller.) pp. 667–755. (Academic Press: San Diego, London, Boston.)

Gomendio, M. , Malo, A. F. , Soler, A. J. , Fernandez-Santos, M. R. , Esteso, M. C. , Garcia, A. J. , Roldan, E. R. , and Garde, J. (2006). Male fertility and sex ratio at birth in red deer. Science 314, 1445–1447.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Mann T. (1964). ‘The Biochemistry of Semen and of the Male Reproductive Tract.’ (Methuen and Co.: London.)

Martinez, I. N. , Moran, J. M. , and Pena, F. J. (2006). Two-step cluster procedure after principal component analysis identifies sperm subpopulations in canine ejaculates and its relation to cryoresistance. J. Androl. 27, 596–603.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Pickard A. R., and Holt W. V. (2004) Cryopreservation as a supporting measure in species conservation: not the frozen zoo! In ‘Life in the Frozen State’. (Eds E. Benson, B. Fuller and N. Lane.) pp. 393–414. (CRC Press: Baton Rouge.)

Quintero-Moreno, A. , Miro, J. , Teresa Rigau, A. , and Rodriguez-Gil, J. E. (2003). Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology 59, 1973–1990.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Robeck T. R., and O’Brien J. K. (2005). Development and application of assisted reproductive technologies in cetaceans. In ‘World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Marine Conservation Issues No. 7’. (Ed. P. Dollinger.) pp. 8–10. (WAZA Liebefeld-Bern: Switzerland.)

Roca, J. , Hernandez, M. , Carvajal, G. , Vazquez, J. M. , and Martinez, E. A. (2006). Factors influencing boar sperm cryosurvival. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 2692–2699.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Rorie, R. W. (1999). Effect of timing of artificial insemination on sex ratio. Theriogenology 52, 1273–1280.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Roth, T. L. (2006). A review of the reproductive physiology of rhinoceros species in captivity. Int. Zoo Yb 40, 130–143.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Satake, N. , Elliott, R. M. A. , Watson, P. F. , and Holt, W. V. (2006). Sperm selection and competition in pigs may be mediated by the differential motility activation and suppression of sperm subpopulations within the oviduct. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 1560–1572.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Schenk, J. L. , and De Grofft, D. L. (2003). Insemination of cow elk with sexed frozen semen. Theriogenology 59, 514–1572.


Schenk, J. L. , Suh, T. K. , and Seidel, G. E. (2006). Embryo production from superovulated cattle following insemination of sexed sperm. Theriogenology 20, 299–307.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seidel, G. E. , and Garner, D. L. (2002). Current status of sexing mammalian spermatozoa. Reproduction 124, 733–743.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Seidel, G. E. , Schenk, J. L. , Herickhoff, L. A. , Doyle, S. P. , Brink, Z. , Green, R. D. , and Cran, D. G. (1999). Insemination of heifers with sexed sperm. Theriogenology 52, 1407–1420.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Sigal, A. , Milo, R. , Cohen, A. , Geva-Zatorsky, N. , Klein, Y. , Liron, Y. , Rosenfeld, N. , Danon, T. , Perzov, N. , and Alon, U. (2006). Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells. Nature 444, 643–646.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Suh, R. S. , Phadke, N. , Ohl, D. A. , Takayama, S. , and Smith, G. D. (2003). Rethinking gamete/embryo isolation and culture with microfluidics. Hum. Reprod. Update 9, 451–461.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Suh, R. S. , Zhu, X. , Phadke, N. , Ohl, D. A. , Takayama, S. , and Smith, G. D. (2006). IVF within microfluidic channels requires lower total numbers and lower concentrations of sperm. Hum. Reprod. 21, 477–483.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Swanson, W. F. (2006). Application of assisted reproduction for population management in felids: The potential and reality for conservation of small cats. Theriogenology 66, 49–58.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Vidal, F. , Blanco, J. , Fugger, E. F. , Keyvanfar, K. , Norton, M. , Schulman, J. D. , and Egozcue, J. (1999). Preliminary study of the incidence of disomy in sperm fractions after MicroSort flow cytometry. Hum. Reprod. 14, 2987–2990.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Zuccotti, M. , Sebastiano, V. , Garagna, S. , and Redi, C. A. (2005). Experimental demonstration that mammalian oocytes are not selective towards X- or Y-bearing sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 71, 245–246.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |