Limitations in the use of electrical conductivity to monitor the behaviour of soil solution
D. A. Rose A C , F. Abbas B and M. A. Adey AA School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
B Present address: 1210 – 49 Coulter Street, Barrie, Ontario L4N 7N2, Canada.
C Corresponding author. Email: jan.fife@ncl.ac.uk
Australian Journal of Soil Research 44(7) 695-700 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04012
Submitted: 27 January 2004 Accepted: 21 June 2006 Published: 20 October 2006
Abstract
Solutions of KBr and K2SO4 of various concentrations were separately displaced by deionised water through 2 contrasting saturated materials, inert solid particles (glass ballotini), and a reactive but non-swelling aggregated clay mineral (sepiolite) over a wide range of flow rates. The concentration of the individual ions in the effluent was analysed (Br– and K+ with ion-specific electrodes, SO42+ by ion chromatography) and that of bulk solution was measured by electrical conductivity (EC). For each displacement, the individual breakthrough curves (BTCs) for the anion, the cation, and the bulk solution were optimised by CXTFIT 2.0.
In ballotini, the BTCs of the anion, cation, and solution were always congruent, the retardation factors did not differ significantly from unity, and the coefficients of hydrodynamic dispersion were identical. For sepiolite, the ions were separated; the bulk solution eluted faster than the cation, slower than the anions. Retardation factors were always less than unity for the anions, greater than unity for the cation, and close to but less than unity for the bulk solution, and became more extreme as the concentration of solute decreased. Dispersion coefficients were, however, unaffected by type of solute, concentration range, or particular ion/EC.
The separation of ions means that the composition as well as the concentration of a solution changes continuously during flow through a reactive soil. Estimates of solution concentration from measurements of EC may thus fail to characterise adequately the movement of the individual components of the solution in such materials. This has implications for the interpretation of any leachate monitoring in reactive soils by methods based on the measurement of EC, such as time-domain reflectometry.
Additional keywords: ballotini, hydrodynamic dispersion, reactive soils, retardation factor, sepiolite, TDR.
Caron J,
Jemia SB,
Gallichand J, Trépanier L
(1999) Field bromide transport under transient-state: monitoring with time domain reflectometry and porous cup. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, 1544–1553.
Das BS,
Wraith JM, Inskeep WI
(1999) Nitrate concentrations in the root zone estimated using time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, 1561–1570.
Heimovaara TJ,
Focke AG,
Bouten W, Verstraten JM
(1995) Assessing temporal variations in soil water composition with time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59, 689–698.
Konukcu F,
Gowing JW, Rose DA
(2002) Simple sensors to achieve fine spatial resolution in continuous measurements of soil moisture and salinity. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 6, 1043–1051.
Misselbrook TH,
Scholefield D, Parkinson R
(2005) Using time domain reflectometry to characterize cattle and pig slurry infiltration into soil. Soil Use and Management 21, 167–172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mojid MA,
Wyseure GCL, Rose DA
(1997) Extension of the measurement range of electrical conductivity by time-domain reflectometry. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 1, 175–183.
Mojid MA,
Rose DA, Wyseure GCL
(2004) A transfer-function method for analysing breakthrough data in the time domain of the transport process. European Journal of Soil Science 55, 699–711.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mojid MA,
Rose DA, Wyseure GCL
(2006) Analysis of partial breakthrough data by a transfer-function method. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44, 175–182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Neve S,
van de Steene J,
Hartmann R, Hofman G
(2000) Using time domain reflectometry for monitoring mineralization of nitrogen from soil organic matter. European Journal of Soil Science 51, 295–304.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nissen HH,
Moldrup P, Henriksen K
(1998) Time domain reflectometry measurements of nitrate transport in manure-amended soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62, 99–109.
Passioura JB, Rose DA
(1971) Hydrodynamic dispersion in aggregated media: 2. Effects of velocity and aggregate size. Soil Science 111, 345–351.
Risler PD,
Wraith JM, Gaber HM
(1996) Solute transport under transient flow conditions estimated using time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 1297–1305.
Robertson RHS
(1957) Sepiolite: a versatile raw material. Chemistry and Industry , 1492–1495.
Vogeler I,
Duwig C,
Clothier BE, Green SR
(2000) A simple approach to determine reactive solute transport using time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 12–18.
