Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Simulation of maize and soybean yield using DSSAT under long-term conventional and no-till systems

Teerath Rai https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-7501 A B * , Sandeep Kumar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-5455 B , Thandiwe Nleya B , Peter Sexton B and Gerrit Hoogenboom C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.

B Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

C Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

* Correspondence to: tsrai@illinois.edu

Handling Editor: Somasundaram Jayaraman

Soil Research 60(6) 520-533 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR21042
Submitted: 16 February 2021  Accepted: 13 January 2022   Published: 10 February 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: No-tillage (NT) has been gaining popularity over the conventional tillage (CT) for agricultural sustainability. Field experiments conducted worldwide to compare crop production under NT vs CT systems are generally site specific and expensive to maintain over longer duration. To overcome this gap, process-based models have been used to simulate the potential impact and benefits of various management practices on crop yield and soil properties under different environmental conditions.

Aims: (1) We evaluated the Cropping System Model (CSM)-CERES-Maize and CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean model for NT and CT systems; and (2) compared the long-term impacts of NT and CT on crop yield and soil organic carbon (SOC).

Methods: Two crop models, available in the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT), were calibrated and evaluated using maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) yield data from 2006 through 2011 under CT and NT treatments.

Key results: For crop yield, we showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) for the calibration and evaluation phases of CERES-Maize model were 0.94 and 0.94, respectively, while the index of agreement (d) for these phases were 0.93 and 0.86. Similarly, the R2 values for the calibration and evaluation phases of CROPGRO-Soybean model were 1.00 and 0.65, respectively, with d-values of 0.99 and 0.85.

Conclusions: The results from these long-term (30-year) simulations suggest that compared to CT, the NT system enhanced SOC over time and, hence, crop yield and biomass production.

Implications: Application of NT can be beneficial for enhancing the soils and crop production in the long-term as compared to the CT system.

Keywords: CERES-Maize, CROPGRO-Soybean, crop modelling, DSSAT, soil conservation, soil organic carbon, soil tillage, sustainability.


References

Addiscott TM, Whitmore AP (1987) Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring. The Journal of Agricultural Science 109, 141
Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Adhikari P, Omani N, Ale S, DeLaune PB, Thorp KR, Barnes EM, Hoogenboom G (2017) Simulated effects of winter wheat cover crop on cotton production systems of the Texas rolling plains. Transactions of the ASABE 60, 2083–2096.
Simulated effects of winter wheat cover crop on cotton production systems of the Texas rolling plains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X, Licht MA (2005) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as influenced by tillage and cropping systems in some Iowa soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105, 635–647.
Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as influenced by tillage and cropping systems in some Iowa soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alhameid A, Ibrahim M, Kumar S, Sexton P, Schumacher TE (2017) Soil organic carbon changes impacted by crop rotational diversity under no-till farming in South Dakota, USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal 81, 868–877.
Soil organic carbon changes impacted by crop rotational diversity under no-till farming in South Dakota, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Álvaro-Fuentes J, López M V, Cantero-Martinez C, Arrúe JL (2008) Tillage effects on soil organic carbon fractions in Mediterranean dryland agroecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72, 541–547.
Tillage effects on soil organic carbon fractions in Mediterranean dryland agroecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barbera V, Poma I, Gristina L, Novara A, Egli M (2012) Long-term cropping systems and tillage management effects on soil organic carbon stock and steady state level of C sequestration rates in a semiarid environment. Land Degradation & Development 23, 82–91.
Long-term cropping systems and tillage management effects on soil organic carbon stock and steady state level of C sequestration rates in a semiarid environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bowen WT, Thornton PK, Hoogenboom G (1998) The simulation of cropping sequences using DSSAT. In ‘Understanding options for agricultural production’. (Eds GY Tsuji, G Hoogenboom, PK Thornton) pp. 313–327. (Springer: Dordrecht).
| Crossref |

de Moraes Sá JC, Séguy L, Tivet F, Lal R, Bouzinac S, Borszowskei PR, Briedis C, dos Santos JB, da Cruz Hartman D, Bertoloni CG, Rosa J, Friedrich T (2015) Carbon depletion by plowing and its restoration by no-till cropping systems in oxisols of subtropical and tropical agro-ecoregions in Brazil. Land Degradation & Development 26, 531–543.
Carbon depletion by plowing and its restoration by no-till cropping systems in oxisols of subtropical and tropical agro-ecoregions in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eden M, Schjønning P, Moldrup P, De Jonge LW (2011) Compaction and rotovation effects on soil pore characteristics of a loamy sand soil with contrasting organic matter content. Soil Use and Management 27, 340–349.
Compaction and rotovation effects on soil pore characteristics of a loamy sand soil with contrasting organic matter content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gijsman AJ, Hoogenboom G, Parton WJ, Kerridge PC (2002) Modifying DSSAT crop models for low-input agricultural systems using a soil organic matter-residue module from CENTURY. Agronomy Journal 94, 462–474.
Modifying DSSAT crop models for low-input agricultural systems using a soil organic matter-residue module from CENTURY.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Godwin DC, Singh U (1998) Nitrogen balance and crop response to nitrogen in upland and lowland cropping systems. In ‘Understanding options for agricultural production’. (Eds GY Tsuji, G Hoogenboom, PK Thornton) pp. 55–77. (Springer)

He J, Jones JW, Graham WD, Dukes MD (2010) Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. Agricultural Systems 103, 256–264.
Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

He J, Li H, Rasaily RG, Wang Q, Cai G, Su Y, Qiao X, Liu L (2011) Soil properties and crop yields after 11 years of no tillage farming in wheat–maize cropping system in North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research 113, 48–54.
Soil properties and crop yields after 11 years of no tillage farming in wheat–maize cropping system in North China Plain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hobbs PR (2007) Conservation agriculture: what is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 127

Hoogenboom G, Jones JW, Traore PCS, Boote KJ (2012) Experiments and data for model evaluation and application. ‘Improving soil fertility recommendations in Africa using the decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT)’. (Eds J Kihara, D Fatondji, JW Jones, G Hoogenboom, R Tabo, A Bationo) pp. 9–18. (Springer)

Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Shelia V, Wilkens PW, Singh U, White JW, Asseng S, Lizaso JI, Moreno LP, Pavan W, Ogoshi R, Hunt LA, Tsuji GY, Jones JW (2019a) The DSSAT crop modeling ecosystem. In ‘Advances in crop modelling for a sustainable agriculture’. (Ed. K Boote) pp. 173–216. (Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Cambridge, UK).
| Crossref |

Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Shelia V, Boote KJ, Singh U, White JW, Hunt LA, Ogoshi R, Lizaso JI, Koo J, Asseng S, Singels A, Moreno LP, Jones JW (2019b) Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) version 4.7.5. https://DSSAT.net. DSSAT Foundation, Gainesville, Florida.

Hunt LA, Boote KJ (1998) Data for model operation, calibration, and evaluation. In ‘Understanding options for agricultural production’. (Eds GY Tsuji, G Hoogenboom, PK Thornton) pp. 9–39. (Springer: Dordrecht)
| Crossref |

Jones W, Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Hunt LA, Thornton PK, Wilkens PW, Imamura DT, Bowen WT, Singh U (1998) Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer: DSSAT v3. In ‘Understanding options for agricultural production. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, vol 7.’. (Eds GY Tsuji, G Hoogenboom, PK Thornton) pp. 157–177. (Springer: Dordrecht)
| Crossref |

Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 235–265.
The DSSAT cropping system model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kahlon MS, Lal R, Ann-Varughese M (2013) Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research 126, 151–158.
Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kennedy AC, Schillinger WF (2006) Soil quality and water intake in traditional-till vs no-till paired farms in Washington’s Palouse Region. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 940–949.
Soil quality and water intake in traditional-till vs no-till paired farms in Washington’s Palouse Region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lal R, Reicosky DC, Hanson JD (2007) Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming. Soil and Tillage Research 93, 1–12.
Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamm FR, Aiken RM, Abou Kheira AA (2009) Corn yield and water use characteristics as affected by tillage, plant density, and irrigation. Transactions of the ASABE 52, 133–143.
Corn yield and water use characteristics as affected by tillage, plant density, and irrigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laudicina VA, Badalucco L, Palazzolo E (2011) Effects of compost input and tillage intensity on soil microbial biomass and activity under Mediterranean conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 47, 63–70.
Effects of compost input and tillage intensity on soil microbial biomass and activity under Mediterranean conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laudicina VA, Novara A, Gristina L, Badalucco L (2014) Soil carbon dynamics as affected by long-term contrasting cropping systems and tillages under semiarid Mediterranean climate. Applied Soil Ecology 73, 140–147.
Soil carbon dynamics as affected by long-term contrasting cropping systems and tillages under semiarid Mediterranean climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laudicina VA, Novara A, Barbera V, Egli M, Badalucco L (2015) Long-term tillage and cropping system effects on chemical and biochemical characteristics of soil organic matter in a Mediterranean semiarid environment. Land Degradation & Development 26, 45–53.
Long-term tillage and cropping system effects on chemical and biochemical characteristics of soil organic matter in a Mediterranean semiarid environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35, 233–241.
Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li ZT, Yang JY, Drury CF, Hoogenboom G (2015) Evaluation of the DSSAT-CSM for simulating yield and soil organic C and N of a long-term maize and wheat rotation experiment in the Loess Plateau of Northwestern China. Agricultural Systems 135, 90–104.
Evaluation of the DSSAT-CSM for simulating yield and soil organic C and N of a long-term maize and wheat rotation experiment in the Loess Plateau of Northwestern China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liu S, Yang JY, Zhang XY, Drury CF, Reynolds WD, Hoogenboom G (2013) Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China. Agricultural Water Management 123, 32–44.
Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mikha MM, Rice CW (2004) Tillage and manure effects on soil and aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 809
Tillage and manure effects on soil and aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munkholm LJ, Schjønning P (2004) Structural vulnerability of a sandy loam exposed to intensive tillage and traffic in wet conditions. Soil and Tillage Research 79, 79–85.

NRCS (2018) Web soil survey. USDA-NRCS. Available at https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

Okoth JO, Mungai NW, Ouma JP, Baijukya FP (2014) Effect of tillage on biological nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) varieties. Australian Journal of Crop Science 8, 1140–1146. http://www.cropj.com/omindi_8_8_2014_1140_1146.pdf

Parton WJ, Ojima DS, Cole CV, Schimel DS (1994) A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. In ‘Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes’. (Eds RB Bryant, RW Arnold) pp. 147–167. (Soil Science Society of America, Inc.)
| Crossref |

Parton WJ, Stewart JWB, Cole CV (1988) Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochemistry 5, 109–131.
Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pickering NB, Hansen JW, Jones JW, Wells CM, Chan VK, Godwin DC (1994) WeatherMan: a utility for managing and generating daily weather data. Agronomy Journal 86, 332–337.
WeatherMan: a utility for managing and generating daily weather data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Porter CH, Jones JW, Adiku S, Gijsman AJ, Gargiulo O, Naab JB (2010) Modeling organic carbon and carbon-mediated soil processes in DSSAT v4.5. Operational Research 10, 247–278.
Modeling organic carbon and carbon-mediated soil processes in DSSAT v4.5.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rani A, Bandyopadhyay KK, Krishnan P, Sarangi A, Datta SP (2020) Simulation of tillage, crop residue mulch and nitrogen interactions on yield and water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum) using DSSAT model. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90, 1856–1864.

Richardson CW, Wright DA (1984) ‘WGEN: a model for generating daily weather variables’ p. 83. (United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service ARS-8). Available at ftp://ftp.biosfera.dea.ufv.br/users/francisca/Franciz/papers/Richardson&Wright.pdf.

RStudio RsT (2015) ‘Integrated development for R.’ (RStudio, Inc.: Boston, MA)

Schjønning P, Munkholm LJ, Elmholt S, Olesen JE (2007) Organic matter and soil tilth in arable farming: management makes a difference within 5–6 years. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 122, 157–172.
Organic matter and soil tilth in arable farming: management makes a difference within 5–6 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schjønning P, de Jonge LW, Munkholm LJ, Moldrup P, Christensen BT, Olesen JE (2012) Clay dispersibility and soil friability – testing the soil clay-to-carbon saturation concept. Vadose Zone Journal 11, vzj2011.0067
Clay dispersibility and soil friability – testing the soil clay-to-carbon saturation concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seligman NG, van Keulen H (1980) PAPRAN: a simulaiton model of annual pasture production limited by rainfall and nitrogen. In ‘Simulation of nitrogen behaviour of soil–plant systems. Papers of a workshop: models for the behaviour of nitrogen in soil and uptake by plant. Comparison between different approaches’, Wageningen, the Netherlands, January 28–February 1, 1980, Vol. 192, pp. 192–221.

Singh P, Alagarswamy G, Hoogenboom G, Pathak P, Wani SP, Virmani SM (1999a) Soybean–chickpea rotation on Vertic Inceptisols II. Long-term simulation of water balance and crop yields. Field Crops Research 63, 225–236.
Soybean–chickpea rotation on Vertic Inceptisols II. Long-term simulation of water balance and crop yields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh P, Alagarswamy G, Pathak P, Wani SP, Hoogenboom G, Virmani SM (1999b) Soybean–chickpea rotation on Vertic Inceptisols. I. Effect of soil depth and landform on light interception, water balance and crop yields. Field Crops Research 63, 211–224.
Soybean–chickpea rotation on Vertic Inceptisols. I. Effect of soil depth and landform on light interception, water balance and crop yields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh N, Vashisht BB, Sharma S, Kaur S (2019) Yield and water balance components in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by management practices: field and simulation study. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 67, 301–308. http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:jisss&volume=67&issue=3&article=007

Soltani A, Hoogenboom G (2003) A statistical comparison of the stochastic weather generators WGEN and SIMMETEO. Climate Research 24, 215–230.
A statistical comparison of the stochastic weather generators WGEN and SIMMETEO.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thornton PK, Hoogenboom G, Wilkens PW, Bowen WT (1995) A computer program to analyze multiple-season crop model outputs. Agronomy Journal 87, 131–136.
A computer program to analyze multiple-season crop model outputs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Triplett GB, Dick WA (2008) No-tillage crop production: a revolution in agriculture!. Agronomy Journal 100, 153–165.
No-tillage crop production: a revolution in agriculture!.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (1998) ‘Understanding options for agricultural production.’ (Springer Science & Business Media)

USDA-NASS (2018) https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=SOUTHDAKOTA. [Accessed 27 July 2019]

Watts CW, Dexter AR, Dumitru E, Arvidsson J (1996) An assessment of the vulnerability of soil structure to destabilisation during tillage. Part I. A laboratory test. Soil and Tillage Research 37, 161–174.
An assessment of the vulnerability of soil structure to destabilisation during tillage. Part I. A laboratory test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 63, 1309–1313.
Some comments on the evaluation of model performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yang J, Greenwood DJ, Rowell DL, Wadsworth GA, Burns IG (2000) Statistical methods for evaluating a crop nitrogen simulation model, N_ABLE. Agricultural Systems 64, 17
Statistical methods for evaluating a crop nitrogen simulation model, N_ABLE.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yang JM, Yang JY, Liu S, Hoogenboom G (2014) An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data. Agricultural Systems 127, 81–89.
An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zambrano-Bigiarini M (2011). hydroGOF: Goodness-of-fit functions for comparison of simulated and observed hydrological time series.
| Crossref |