Register      Login
Invertebrate Systematics Invertebrate Systematics Society
Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The evolutionary relationships of North American Diplous Motschulsky (Coleoptera : Carabidae : Patrobini) inferred from morphological and molecular evidence

Paul E. Marek A B C D and David H. Kavanaugh A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118, USA.

B Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.

C Current address: Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Howell Science Complex, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: pm0623@mail.ecu.edu

Invertebrate Systematics 19(2) 145-168 https://doi.org/10.1071/IS04011
Submitted: 13 April 2004  Accepted: 12 April 2005   Published: 29 June 2005

Abstract

Individuals of the ground beetle genus Diplous Motschulsky, 1850 occur in riparian areas predominately throughout boreal North America and Asia. In order to infer the species phylogeny of the North American Diplous, we examined 97 morphological characters (56 quantitative characters and 41 qualitative characters) and 458 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I region. We used the four North American species, four Palearctic species, and one undescribed species of a closely related genus to test the monophyly and the direction of character state change in North American Diplous. Overall, we found that North American Diplous appear to represent a monophyletic group, but that the morphological and molecular evidence did not support the same relationships in the placement of one of the species. We found that the total evidence trees agreed most with biogeography and considerations of accelerated morphological evolution. In this paper, we present a morphological phylogenetic tree, a molecular phylogenetic tree, a total evidence phylogenetic tree, a species key, species diagnoses, and a distribution map of Nearctic Diplous.

Additional keywords: COI, cytochrome oxidase subunit I, Diplous, glacier, ground beetle, Platidius, Pleistocene, refugia, riparian, total evidence, vicariance.


Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a Graduate Assistantship from the California Academy of Sciences. To the Entomology Department staff at California Academy of Sciences, the first author is grateful for accommodating me as a graduate student and for providing a great research atmosphere. Thanks are also due to lenders of museum specimens (Liang Hongbin for specimens from IOZB and Stuart Hine for specimens from BMNH), and the collectors who obtained fresh specimens on my behalf (Robert Nelson for specimens from Maine and Tracy Mastranicola for specimens from Washington). We would also like to thank Greg Spicer, John Hafernik, Corrie Saux, and Alexander Zamotajlov for their help on technical and theoretical issues, as well as Jason Bond, Petra Sierwald, and anonymous reviewers for providing very helpful suggestions on the final versions of the manuscript.


References


Ball G. E. (1972) Classification of the species of the Harpalus subgenus Glanodes Casey (Carabidae, Coleoptera). Coleopterists Bulletin 26, 179–204. open url image1

Ball G. E., and Bousquet Y. (2001). Family 6. Carabidae. In ‘American Beetles: Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga, Polyphaga: Staphyliniformia’. (Eds R. H. Arnett and M. C. Thomas.) pp. 32–132. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)

Bates H. W. (1873) On the Geodephagous Coleoptera of Japan. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 2, 294–295. open url image1

Brower A. V. Z. (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91, 6491–6495.
PubMed |
open url image1

Chaudoir M. (1871) Le Groupe des Pogonides. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 24, 49–51. open url image1

Casey T. L. (1918). Memoirs on the Coleoptera Vol. 8. pp. 1–427. (The New Era Printing Company: Lancaster, PA, USA.)

Darlington P. J. (1938) The American Patrobini (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Entomologica Americana 18, 135–183. open url image1

Demboski J. R., Cook J. A. (2001) Phylogeography of the dusky shrew, Sorex monticolus (Insectivora, Soricidae): insight into deep and shallow history in northwestern North America. Molecular Ecology 10, 1227–1240.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Dejean P.M.F.A (1828). Spécies général des Coléoptères de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean, Vol. 3. pp. 32–33. (Mequignon-Marvis pere et fils: Paris, France.)

Erwin T. L. (1991) Natural history of the carabid beetles at the BIOLAT Biological Station, Rio Manu, Pakitza, Peru. Revista Peruana de Entomologia 33, 1–85. open url image1

Felsenstein J. (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17, 368–376.
Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Foster J.B. (1965) The evolution of the mammals of the Queen Charlotte Is, British Columbia. Occasional Papers of the British Columbian Provincial Museum 14, 1–130. open url image1

von Gebler F. (1829). Bemerkungen über die Insekten Sibiriens, vorzüglich des Altai. In ‘Reisse durch das Altai-Gebirge und die Soongorische Kirgisen-Steppe. Vol 2, Part 3’. (Ed. C. F. von Ledebour) pp. 1–228. (Reise: Berlin, Germany.)

Hansen T. F., Martins E. P. (1996) Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 50, 1404–1407. open url image1

Hillis D. M., Huelsenbeck J. P. (1992) Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. The Journal of Heredity 83, 189–195.
PubMed |
open url image1

Hoffman R. L. (1963) A second species of the spider genus Hypochilus from eastern North America. American Museum Novitates 2148, 1–8. open url image1

Huelsenbeck J. P., Crandall K. A. (1997) Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 437–466.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. (1991) Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution 32, 128–144.
PubMed |
open url image1

Kavanaugh D. H. (1988) The insect fauna of the Pacific Northwest Coast of North America: present patterns and affinities and their origins. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 144, 125–149. open url image1

Kühnelt W. (1941) Revision der laufkäfergattungen Patrobus und Diplous. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 51, 151–192. open url image1

Lanave C., Preparata G., Saccone C., Serio G. (1984) A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20, 86–93.
PubMed |
open url image1

LeConte J. L. (1869) List of coleoptera collected in Vancouver’s I. by Henry and Joseph Matthews, with descriptions of some new species. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (ser. 4) 4, 369–385. open url image1

Lindroth C. H. (1961) The ground-beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 2. Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 20, 1–200. open url image1

Lindroth C. H. (1975) Designation of holotypes and lectotypes among ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) described by Thomas L. Casey. Coleopterists Bulletin 29, 109–147. open url image1

Maddison D. R., Baker M. D., Ober K. A. (1999) Phylogeny of carabid beetles as inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Systematic Entomology 24, 103–138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Maddison W. P., and Maddison D. R. (2000). ‘MacClade, version 4.0.’ (Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA.)

Motschulsky V. (1844) Insectes de la Siberie rapports d’un voyage fait en 1839 et 1840. Mémoirs de l'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg 15, 1–274. open url image1

Motschulsky V. (1850). ‘Die Kaefer Russlands. I. Insecta Carabica.’ (Gautier: Moscow, Russia.)

Motschulsky V. (1859) Coléoptères nouveaux de la Californie. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 32, 122–185. open url image1

Notman H. (1919) Records and new species of Carabidae. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 27, 225–237. open url image1

Quek S.-P., Davies S. J., Itino T., Pierce N. E. (2004) Codiversification in an ant-plant mutualism: stem texture and the evolution of host use in Crematogaster (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) inhabitants of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 58, 554–570.
PubMed |
open url image1

Randall J. W. (1838) Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the state of Maine. Boston Journal of Natural History 2, 1–33. open url image1

Reichardt H. (1977) A synopsis of the genera of Neotropical Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Quaestiones Entomologicae 13, 346–493. open url image1

Rodríguez F., Oliver J. L., Marin A., Medina J. R. (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142, 485–501.
PubMed |
open url image1

Shelley R. M. (1993) Revision of the milliped genus Scytonotus Koch (Polydesmida: Polydesmidae). Brimleyana 19, 1–60. open url image1

Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 1114–1116. open url image1

Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P. (1994) Evolution,weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America Nov 1994, 651–701. open url image1

Stone K. D., Flynn R. W., Cook J. A. (2002) Post-glacial colonization of northwestern North America by the forest-associated American marten (Martes americana, Mammalia: Carnivora: Mustelidae). Molecular Ecology 11, 2049–2063.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Swofford D. L. (2002). ‘PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4 ver 4.0b10’. (Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA.)

Tavaré S. (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures on Mathematics and Statistics in the Life Sciences 17, 57–86. open url image1

Thiele K. (1993) The Holy Grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9, 275–304.
Crossref |
open url image1

Watrous L. E., Wheeler Q. D. (1981) The outgroup comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology 30, 1–11. open url image1

Wen J. (1999) Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30, 421–455.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wiens J. J. (2001) Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and solutions. Systematic Biology 50, 689–699.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Wooding S., Ward R. (1997) Phylogeography and Pleistocene evolution in the North American black bear. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 1096–1105.
PubMed |
open url image1

Zamotajlov A. S. (1992) Notes on classification of the subfamily Patrobinae (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Palaearctic region with description of new taxa. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse 65, 251–281. open url image1

Zamotajlov A. S. (1996) Contribution to the knowledge of the Palaearctic species of the genus Diplous Motschulsky, 1850 (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zoosystematica Rossica 5, 107–129. open url image1

Zamotajlov A. S. (2002). Inferring phylogenetic system of the carabid subfamily Patrobinae (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Meetings in memory of N.A. Cholodkovsky. (Zoological Institute of Russia: St. Petersburg, Russia.) Available online at: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/patrob_2.pdf, verified 6 April 2004










Appendix 1.  Median values for morphometric ratios by species for males (characters: 1–31) and females (characters: 32–56)
n, species sample size; values rounded to the thousandth; numbers refer to characters listed in Table 2
Click to zoom


Appendix 1a. continued
Click to zoom



Appendix 2.  Morphology character state matrix (TreeBASE Acc. M2288)
Click to zoom


Appendix 2a. continued
Click to zoom