Achieving positive social outcomes through participatory urban wildlife conservation projects
Sarah J. Hobbs A and Piran C. L. White A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Environment Department, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK.
B Corresponding author. Email: piran.white@york.ac.uk
Wildlife Research 42(7) 607-617 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14184
Submitted: 11 September 2014 Accepted: 14 November 2015 Published: 4 January 2016
Abstract
Context: As urbanisation continues to increase on a global scale, people are becoming increasingly distanced from nature. Fewer opportunities to encounter nature mean that the benefits of engaging with nature are often not realised by urban residents. In response to this, there is a growing number of initiatives that aim to connect people with nature, for the benefit of individuals, communities and nature conservation. However, in order to maximise these benefits, it is important to understand the potential transformative effects for participants, both on a personal level and in terms of wider impacts.
Aims: In this study, we evaluate the social outcomes of a participatory wildlife conservation project in an urban area in north-east England, using hedgehogs as the focal species.
Methods: Based on an approach of community volunteers working alongside scientific researchers in an evaluation of hedgehog urban habitat use, we examine the transformative effects of this involvement at the individual and community levels via qualitative semi-structured interviews with community volunteers.
Key results: Participants were motivated by personal wellbeing factors such as enjoying proximity to the study species, learning and social factors. Participation in the study itself indicates a degree of motivation for engaging with a study of this sort. Nevertheless, involvement in the study was a successful vehicle for increasing participants’ engagement with nature both during the study and potentially into the future, particularly in terms of biological recording and gardening for wildlife.
Conclusions: Participation in a wildlife study is a positive experience for many volunteers, leading to actual and potential changes in both personal and wider social outcomes.
Implications: Participatory initiatives such as the one described have an important role to play in signposting and supporting volunteers to follow future environmental aspirations and maximise the personal and social benefits associated with participation. This could be enhanced by ensuring that volunteering opportunities are linked in with pre-existing community-based networks that can act as advocates for environmental and wildlife conservation.
Additional keywords: biological recording, citizen science, conservation, engagement, health, hedgehog, radio-tracking, volunteer, wellbeing.
References
Baker, P. J., and Harris, S. (2007). Urban mammals: what does the future hold? An analysis of the factors affecting patterns of use of residential gardens in Great Britain. Mammal Review 37, 297–315.Battersby, J. (ed) (2005). UK mammals: species status and population trends. First Report by the Tracking Mammals Partnership. JNCC/Tracking Mammals Partnership, Peterborough, UK.
Bell, S., Morris, N., Findlay, C., Travlou, P., Montarzino, A., Gooch, D., Gregory, G., and Ward-Thompson, C. (2004). Nature for people: the importance of green spaces to East Midlands communities. English Nature Research Reports 567, English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
Bell, S., Marzano, M., Cent, J., Kobierska, H., Podjed, D., Vandzinskaite, D., Reinert, H., Armaitiene, A., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., and Muršič, R. (2008). What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 3443–3454.
| What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bird, W. (2004). Natural Fit. Can greenspace and biodiversity increase levels of physical activity? Report for the RSPB, endorsed by the Faculty of Public Health, RSPB, Sandy, UK.
Bodin, Ö., and Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19, 366–374.
| The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., and Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science 343, 1436–1437.
| Next steps for citizen science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24675940PubMed |
Bowen-Jones, E., and Entwistle, A. (2002). Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx 36, 189–195.
| Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., and Daily, G. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249, 118–136.
| The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22320203PubMed |
Bruyere, B., and Rappe, S. (2007). Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50, 503–516.
| Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bryman, A. (2008). ‘Social Research Methods.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
CABE (2005). Decent Parks? Decent Behaviour? The link between the quality of parks and user behaviour. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, London.
Cheng, J. C. H., and Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior 44, 31–49.
| Connection to nature: children’s affective attitude toward nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Conrad, C., and Hilchey, K. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176, 273–291.
| A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20640506PubMed |
Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., and Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society 12, 11.
Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., Warren, P. H., Armsworth, P. R., and Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62, 47–55.
| Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davies, L., Bell, J. N. B., Bone, J., Head, M., Hill, L., Howard, C., Hobbs, S. J., Jones, D. T., Power, S. A., Rose, N., Ryder, C., Seed, L., Stevens, G., Toumi, R., Voulvoulis, N., and White, P. C. L. (2011). Open Air Laboratories (OPAL): A community-driven research programme. Environmental Pollution 159, 2203–2210.
| Open Air Laboratories (OPAL): A community-driven research programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXnsVyks7w%3D&md5=42908a843eef6bf6e9cc2fa9c1a0ababCAS | 21458125PubMed |
Devictor, V., Whittaker, R. J., and Beltrame, C. (2010). Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Diversity & Distributions 16, 354–362.
| Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., and Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 41, 149–172.
| Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., Phillips, T., and Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10, 291–297.
| The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fjørtoft, I., and Sageie, J. (2000). The natural environment as a playground for children: landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 48, 83–97.
| The natural environment as a playground for children: landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Flick, U. (2009). ‘An Introduction to Qualitative Research.’ (SAGE: London.)
Gledhill, D. G., James, P., and Davies, D. H. (2008). Pond density as a determinant of aquatic species richness in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology 23, 1219–1230.
| Pond density as a determinant of aquatic species richness in an urban landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grahn, P., and Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2, 1–18.
| Landscape planning and stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., and Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 109–123.
| Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hibbert, S., Piacentini, M., and Dajani, H. (2003). Understanding volunteer motivation for participation in a community-based food cooperative. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8, 30–42.
| Understanding volunteer motivation for participation in a community-based food cooperative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobbs, S. J. (2012). Community participation in biodiversity monitoring. Ph.D. Thesis, University of York, York, UK.
Home, R., Keller, C., Nagel, P., Bauer, N., and Hunziker, M. (2009). Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations. Environmental Conservation 36, 139–148.
| Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home. Environment and Behavior 33, 507–542.
| The nature of the view from home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Katcher, A. H., and Beck, A. M. (1987). Health and caring for living things. Anthrozoos 1, 175–183.
| Health and caring for living things.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kollmuss, A., and Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8, 239–260.
| Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kontoleon, A., and Swanson, T. (2003). The willingness to pay for property rights for the giant panda: can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation? Land Economics 79, 483–499.
| The willingness to pay for property rights for the giant panda: can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawrence, A. (2005). Reluctant citizens? The disjuncture between participatory biological monitoring and environmental governance. Paper presented at ‘International Sociology Association Conference “Environment, Knowledge and Democracy”, Luminy, Marseilles, France, 6–7 July 2005’.
Lawrence, A. (2006). No personal motive? Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics Place and Environment 9, 279–298.
| No personal motive? Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leader-Williams, N., and Dublin, H. T. (2000). Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In ‘Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda had its Day?’. (Eds A. Entwhistle and N. Dunstone.) pp. 53–81. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Mainwaring, L. (2001). Biodiversity, biocomplexity, and the economics of genetic dissimilarity. Land Economics 77, 79–83.
| Biodiversity, biocomplexity, and the economics of genetic dissimilarity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martinez, T. A., and McMullin, S. L. (2004). Factors affecting decisions to volunteer in nongovernmental organizations. Environment and Behavior 36, 112–126.
| Factors affecting decisions to volunteer in nongovernmental organizations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52, 883–890.
| Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mitchell, R., and Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372, 1655–1660.
| Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18994663PubMed |
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., and Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior 41, 715–740.
| The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Brien, L., Townsend, M., and Ebden, M. (2008). Environmental volunteering: motivations, barriers and benefits, Report to the Scottish Forestry Trust and Forestry Commission, UK.
Parris, K. M. (2006). Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 757–764.
| Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16689958PubMed |
Phillips, M. (1982). Motivation and expectation in successful volunteerism. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 11, 118–125.
| Motivation and expectation in successful volunteerism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pocock, M. J. O., Chapman, D. S., Sheppard, L. J., and Roy, H. E. (2014). Choosing and using citizen science: a guide to when and how to use citizen science to monitor biodiversity and the environment. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Pretty, J., Griffin, M., Peacock, J., Hine, R., Sellens, M., and South, N. (2005). ‘A Countryside for Health and Well-Being: Then Physical and Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise.’ (Countryside Recreation Network: Sheffield, UK.)
Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., and Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In ‘Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February 11–15, Seattle, Washington, USA’. pp. 217–226.
Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 467–471.
| A new dawn for citizen science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Social Research Association (2003). ‘Ethical Guidelines.’ (Social Research Association: London.)
SPSS Inc (2008). SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
Takano, T., Nakamura, K., and Watanabe, M. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 56, 913–918.
| Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38npvFGltg%3D%3D&md5=0907841bb3da251cccf3d35339a6e183CAS | 12461111PubMed |
Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., and Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD. Environment and Behavior 33, 54–77.
| Coping with ADD.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner, W. R., Nakamura, T., and Dinetti, M. (2004). Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54, 585–590.
| Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tweddle, J. C., Robinson, L. D., Pocock, M. J., and Roy, H. E. (2012). Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. Natural History Museum and NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology for UK-EOF. Available at www.ukeof.org.uk.
UKBAP (2010). Accessed 4 August 2010. www.jncc.defra.gov.uk
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224, 420–421.
| View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7nt1ajtA%3D%3D&md5=d45a51987d97430d8b3315b27bbd7c2eCAS | 6143402PubMed |
Van den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., and Groenewegen, P. P. (2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Social Science & Medicine 70, 1203–1210.
Veríssimo, D., Fraser, I., Groombridge, J., Bristol, R., and MacMillan, D. C. (2009). Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands. Animal Conservation 12, 549–558.
| Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
