CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 16(2)

39 MATERNAL ORIGIN OF OOCYTES AFFECTS IN UTERO DEVELOPMENTAL CAPACITY AND PHENOTYPE OF BOVINE NUCLEAR TRANSFER FETUSES

S. Hiendleder A, H.-D. Reichenbach B, H. Wenigerkind C, D. Bebbere A, G. Brem D, V. Zakhartchenko B, E. Wolf A

A Department of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center of the Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany. email: S.Hiendleder@gen.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de;
B Bavarian Research Station for Animal Breeding, Grub, Germany;
C Bavarian Research Center for Biology of Reproduction (BFZF), Oberschleissheim, Germany;
D Agrobiogen GmbH, Hilgertshausen, Germany.
 
 Full Text
 PDF (302 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Epigenetic phenomena have been recognized as an important issue in somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and have been linked to SCNT success rate. We have previously reported a significant maternal lineage effect of oocyte donors on the number of transferable embryos obtained after SCNT (Brüggerhoff et al., 2002 Biol. Reprod. 66, 367–373), pointing to ooplasmic maternal genetic/epigenetic factors important for early embryonic development. We have now extended this study and generated a set of cloned embryos using recipient oocyte pools from defined or random maternal sources that were identified by pedigree data and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotype, to study effects of nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions on in utero developmental capacity and fetal phenotype. Embryos were reconstructed from granulosa cells of a Bos taurus (Brown Swiss) cow using oocytes with B. taurus A (Simmental), B. taurus B (Simmental), B. indicus (Dwarf Zebu), or random B. taurus (Brown Swiss) cytoplasm. Two to three embryos per recipient heifer (Simmental) were transferred on Day 7 after SCNT, and fetuses were recovered after slaughter of recipients on Day 80. The number of pregnancies obtained per transferred embryo on Day 28 was similar for the B. taurus combinations (0.11–0.15) but much higher for a limited number of embryos reconstructed with B. indicus cytoplasm (0.50). Developmental capacity of embryos derived from the four oocyte pools varied considerably and resulted in 8 (11.1%), 3 (4.6%), 2 (33%) and 10 (15.2%) viable fetuses with B. taurus A, B. taurus B, B. indicus and random B. taurus cytoplasm, respectively. When fetuses in resorption were included, however, the percentages for recovered fetuses on Day 80 were similar (12.5, 13.8 and 16.7%) in all B. taurus combinations. Body weight, crown rump length, thorax circumference (P < 0.05), and femur length (P < 0.01) of viable fetuses with B. taurus A cytoplasm differed from fetuses with random B. taurus cytoplasm and showed less variation. Furthermore, body weights of fetuses with B. taurus A or B, or B. indicus cytoplasm, were not significantly different from those of B. taurus (Brown Swiss) control fetuses produced by artificial insemination, but fetuses reconstructed with cytoplasts from randomly collected B. taurus oocytes indicated fetal overgrowth (80.6 ± 6.5 g v. 107.9 ± 5.8 g, P < 0.01). Our data point to complex ooplasm-dependent epigenetic modifications and/or nuclear DNA mtDNA interactions that affect developmental capacity and fetal weight and dimensions in SCNT. This might also be relevant for crossbreeding in farm animals and other reproductive technologies such as ooplasmic transfer in human-assisted reproduction

   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012