Abstract

It is assumed that, contrary to phosphate buffers, zwitterionic buffers are neutral. However, zwitterionic buffers containing hydroxymethyl or hydroxyethyl residues may interact with OH-groups in the media and produce formaldehyde (Shiraishi et al. 1993 Free Radic. Res. Commun. 19, 315-321). Also, it was shown that three zwitterionic buffers tested in this study interact with DNA (Stellwagen et al. 2000 Anal. Biochem. 287, 167-175). Our objective was to evaluate the effect of the following buffers: TES (T), MOPS (M), HEPES (H) (pKa values at 20°C: 7.2-7.5), and PBS on in vitro development and morphology of bovine embryos. Zwitterionic buffers and PBS were prepared at a concentration of 10 mM in TALP medium and the final pH was adjusted to 7.2. Bovine follicular fluid was aspirated from abattoir-derived ovaries and evenly divided into four tubes. Collected oocytes (five replicates) from each tube were processed separately through the entire IVM, IVF, and IVC procedures using washing medium buffered with: PBS (n = 490), Group 1; H (n = 438), Group 2; M (n = 440), Group 3; and T (n = 394), Group 4. All buffers contained 4 mg/mL BSA. Oocytes were matured in TCM-199 + 10% FCS and 10 ng/mL of epidermal growth factor and fertilized in Fert-TALP containing 25 mM bicarbonate, 22 mM sodium lactate, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 6 mg/mL BSA-FAF, and 10 ¼g/mL heparin with 1 × 10⁶ spermatozoa/mL. After 24 h, oocytes-sperm co-incubation presumptive zygotes were cultured in SOFaa medium with 8 mg/mL BSA at 39°C under paraffin oil and 5% CO₂ in humidified air. Cumulus-oocyte complexes and zygotes were held in designated buffers ?16 min before oocyte maturation, ~7 min after IVM and before IVF, and ~18 min after IVF and before culture. The total time of oocyte/embryo exposure to each buffer was ?41 min. Embryo development was recorded on Days 4, 7, 8, and 9. A total of ten, Day 8 blastocysts were taken randomly from each treatment and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for total and apoptotic cells counts, and five blastocysts from each replicate and treatment were frozen for later mRNA analysis. Apoptosis were determined by TUNEL, using commercial In situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostic, SL, Barcelono, Spain). Embryo development among groups was compared by chi-square analysis. The cleavage rates were not different among the groups: PBS, 70.8%; H, 76.5%; M, 77.5% and T, 73.6%. The number of embryos that developed to d8 cells at Day 4 was higher in M, 36.2%, and PBS, 37.6%, than in H, 30.6%, and T, 29.7%, but was not significantly different. However, more (P < 0.05) blastocysts developed at Days 7, 8, and 9 in H and M than in PBS and T groups (21.9% and 22.9% vs. 16.9% and 14.9%, respectively). No difference was found between groups in total cell number (98.8 ± 7, PBS; 111.8 ± 11.9, M; 106.8 ± 12.9, H; and 104.3 ± 9.7, T) and the number of apoptotic cells (9.2 ± 1.0, P; 9.2 ± 0.8, M; 12.9 ± 1.8, H; and 9.7 ± 0.9, T). Based on the results of this study, we conclude that within our protocol choice of buffer may affect embryo developmental rates but not morphology.