CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 18(2)

19 PREGNANCY RATES IN DAIRY COWS TREATED WITH INTRAVAGINAL PROGESTERONE DEVICES AND DIFFERENT FIXED-TIME AI PROTOCOLS

G. Veneranda, L. Filippi, D. Racca, G. Romero, E. Balla, L. Cutaia and G. A. Bo

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(2) 118 - 118

Abstract

Two experiments were designed to evaluate the effect of different treatments for the synchronization of ovulation on pregnancy rates following fixed-time AI (FTAI) of lactating dairy cows. In Experiment 1, 394 Holstein cows that were 61.7 ± 13.6 days postpartum (range 35 to 94 days), with a milk yield of 30.7 ± 6.8 liters per day (range 12.0 to 52.4 liters) and a body condition score (BCS) between 2.5 to 3.5 out of 5, were used. Cows were blocked by days postpartum and milk yield and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Cows in P4+EB treatment groups received an intravaginal DIB device (1 g P4; Syntex, Argentina) and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB; Syntex) i.m. on Day 0. On Day 8, DIB devices were removed, and cows received PGF (150 µg D+cloprostenol: Ciclase; Syntex), and were subdivided to receive 400 IU eCG (Novormon 5000, Syntex) i.m. or no further treatment at that time. On Day 9, all cows received 1 mg of EB and were FTAI 60 h after DIB removal. Cows in P4-Synch groups received a DIB device and 50 µg of GnRH (Lecirelina, Gonasyn; Syntex) i.m. on Day 0. On Day 7, DIB devices were removed; cows received PGF and were divided to receive 400 IU eCG i.m. or no further treatment. On Day 9, all cows received a second GnRH treatment and were FTAI 60 h after DIB removal. Blood samples were taken on Days -10 and 0 to determine plasma P4 concentrations; 93% of the cows had >1 ng/mL P4 in at least one sample. In Experiment 2, 200 lactating cows from the same farm were treated with the P4+EB+eCG and P4-Synch without eCG treatments with either a DIB or a CIDR-B (1.9 g P4; Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA) in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Cows were examined by rectal palpation 50 days after FTAI to determine pregnancy status, and data were analyzed by chi-square Mantel-Haenszel test. There was an EB/GnRH by eCG interaction (P < 0.05) which was attributed to a higher pregnancy rate in the P4+EB+eCG group (44/98; 44.9%) than in the P4+EB without eCG group (30/100; 30.0%) and P4-Synch+eCG group (30/98; 30.6%); the P4-Synch without eCG group had an intermediate pregnancy rate that did not differ from the other treatment groups (37/98; 38.8%). In Experiment 2, no significant differences (P = 0.40) in pregnancy rates were detected between cows treated with DIB (51/100; 51.0%) or CIDR-B (42/100; 42.0%), and there was no difference (P = 0.18) between P4+EB+eCG (52/100; 52.0%) and P4-Synch without eCG (41/100; 41.0%) treated groups. Results suggest that the addition of eCG will improve pregnancy rates following FTAI in lactating dairy cows treated with EB but not in those treated with GnRH at the time of insertion and after removal of a P4 releasing device. Although treatment with P4+EB+eCG resulted in numerically higher pregnancy rates, results were not different from those obtained in the GnRH-based treatment, without the addition of eCG.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv18n2Ab19

© CSIRO 2006

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012