CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 18(2)

8 EFFECT OF DURATION OF TREATMENT WITH PROGESTERONE VAGINAL DEVICES ON PREGNANCY RATES IN CROSS-BRED ZEBU CATTLE ARTIFICIALLY INSEMINATED AT A FIXED TIME

E. Balla, D. Pincinato, D. Maraña, L. C. Peres, L. F. K. Borges and G. A. Bó

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(2) 112 - 113

Abstract

Three experiments were designed to evaluate the effect of the duration of treatment with progesterone (P4) vaginal devices (1 g of P4, Triu-B; Biogénesis, Buenos Aires, Argentina) on pregnancy rates in crossbred zebu cattle artificially inseminated at a fixed time (FTAI). In Exp. 1, 371 non-lactating multiparous crossbred zebu cows with a body condition score (BCS) between 2.0 and 3.0 out of 5 were randomly allocated to one of nine treatment groups in a 3 × 3 factorial design. On Day 0, all cows received 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB, Bioestrogen; Biogénesis) i.m. and were divided into groups to receive a new Triu-B device, a once-previously-used Triu-B (2nd-use), or a Triu-B that was previously used twice (3rd-use) and in which three silicone rings (2 cm in length) impregnated with 100 mg P4 each were threaded through the wings of the device. Triu-B devices are currently approved for re-use up to three times. Cows were further subdivided to have their Triu-B devices removed on Days 7, 8, or 9. PGF (150 ¼g D(+)cloprostenol, Enzaprost-DC; Biogénesis) was administered i.m. at the time of Triu-B removal, followed by 1 mg EB 24 h later; all cows were FTAI 52 to 56 h after Triu-B removal. In Exp. 2, 417 crossbred zebu heifers, 20 to 26 months of age and BCS between 2.5 and 3.5, were treated similarly to the cows in Exp. 1, except that only new or 3rd-use Triu-B were used. In Exp. 3, 836 crossbred zebu heifers, similar to those used in Exp. 2, were also treated similarly to the cows in Exp. 1, but in this case, Triu-B devices were inserted for 8, 9, or 10 days. Pregnancy rates were determined by ultrasonography 50 to 60 days after FTAI and were analyzed by logistic regression. In Exp. 1, there were no significant effects of duration of treatment [7 days: 69/137 (50.4%), 8 days: 68/139 (48.9%), or 9 days: 41/95 (43.2%); P = 0.28], or type of Triu-B used (P = 0.91; new Triu-B: 47.7%, 2nd-use: 48.9%, or 3rd-use: 47.2%). In Exp. 2, there were no significant effects of duration of treatment [7 days: 76/139 (54.7%), 8 days: 63/143 (44.1%), or 9 days: 73/135 (54.1%); P = 0.98] or type of Triu-B used (new Triu-B: 48.6% and 3rd-use Triu-B: 53.2%; P = 0.33). In Exp. 3, there was an interaction between duration of treatment and pregnancy rates (P < 0.05). Lower pregnancy rates were obtained in 9- and 10-day treatments than in 8-day treatments, but only when previously used Triu-B devices were used. Pregnancy rates were: new Triu-B for 8 days: 42/89 (47.2%), 9 days: 37/90 (41.1%), and 10 days: 41/91 (45.1%); 2nd-use Triu-B for 8 days: 51/103 (49.5%), 9 days: 39/104 (37.5%), and 10 days: 39/109 (35.8%); 3rd-use Triu-B for 8 days: 52/90 (57.4%), 9 days: 31/90 (34.4%), and 10 days: 25/70 (35.7%); P < 0.01. Results demonstrate that treatment of crossbred zebu cattle with P4 devices for 7 to 10 days results in comparable pregnancy rates when new Triu-B devices are used. However, pregnancy rates decreased when previously used Triu-B devices were inserted for more than 8 days.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv18n2Ab8

© CSIRO 2006

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012