219 COMPARISON OF ESTRUS–OVULATION SYNCHRONIZATION TREATMENTS USING HOLSTEIN HEIFERS AS EMBRYO TRANSFER RECIPIENTS

Abstract

The Ovsynch system (Pursley et al. 1995 Theriogenology 44, 915–923) has been effectively employed as the synchronization method of recipients for embryo transfer (ET) (Nishisouzu et al. 2004 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 16, 212–213). To establish the most effective Ovsynch system, we experimentally assessed 3 different protocols by comparing resultant estrus-synchronization rates of Holstein heifers and pregnancy rates of the recipients after ET. Holstein heifers averaging 14–15 months old and weighing over 330 kg were used in this study. They were randomly separated into the following 3 groups: (1) Select-synch (SS) group: an intramuscular (IM) injection of 50 µg GnRH analog was given to heifers at a random stage of the estrus cycle, followed 7 days later by 2 IM injections of 7.5 mg PG analog at an interval of 6 h; (2) Co-synch (CS) group: another IM injection of 50 µg GnRH was given to the SS group at 48 h after the first injection of PG; and (3) Heat-synch (HS) group: an IM injection of 0.75 mg estradiol benzoate was given to the SS group at 24 h after the first injection of PG. Estrus detection was evaluated twice daily by visual observation and use of a Heat Mount Detector. All heifers were additionally injected with 1500 IU hCG 5 days after estrus, to ensure favorable luteal function (Nishigai et al. 2001 J. Reprod. Dev. 47, 283–294). Rectal palpation was used to select acceptable recipients, i.e. those having functional corpora lutea (CL) e17 mm in diameter for 7 days after showing estrus (Nishisouzu et al. 2004 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 16, 212–213). The size of CL e17 mm was determined by rectal palpation by skillful transferors. Fresh embryos collected from super-ovulated cattle 7 days after estrus were nonsurgically transferred only into acceptable recipients that had functional CL and were properly synchronized, 7–8 days after estrus. Final diagnosis of pregnancy was carried out 60 days after ET. Data were analyzed by the chi-square test. The HS group showed significantly higher (P < 0.01) rates of estrus synchronization (87/89: 98%) at 24–72 h after PG injection, estrus detection (98%), and acceptable suitability as recipients with a functional CL (92%) compared to those of the SS (185/210: 88%, 87%, and 73%, respectively) and CS (68/81: 84%, 74%, and 69%, respectively) groups. The pregnancy rates of heifers that received an embryo were not significantly different among HS, SS, and CS groups (45/82: 55%, 78/153: 51%, and 25/56: 45%, respectively). However, because the yield rate of acceptable recipients in the HS group was higher than in the other groups, the final pregnancy rates (no. pregnant/no. synchronization treatment) of the HS group (50%) was significantly higher than those of the SS and CS groups (37%; P < 0.05, and 31%; P < 0.01, respectively). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the HS protocol is effective for estrus–ovulation synchronization of Holstein heifers, thus improving the productivity of ET by increasing the yield rates of heifers with a functional CL which leads to acceptable pregnancy results.