CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

208 EFFECT OF GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ON BLASTOCYST DEVELOPMENT AND POST-TRANSFER SURVIVAL OF IN VITRO-PRODUCED BOVINE EMBRYOS

B. Loureiro, L. Bonilla, G. Entrican and P. J. Hansen

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20(1) 183 - 183

Abstract

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that has been implicated in preimplantation embryo development. Granulocyte-macrophage-CSF improves the proportion of bovine embryos that become blastocysts in vitro (Moraes and Hansen 1997 Biol. Reprod. 57, 1060–1065) and increases blastocyst cell numbers in mice (Robertson et al. 2001 Biol. Reprod. 64, 1206–1215). The long-term goal of the present research was to evaluate the effects of GM-CSF on post-transfer survival of bovine embryos. The experiments used recombinant ovine GM-CSF produced in transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells or an equivalent volume of cytokine-free CHO cell supernatant (control). The objective of the first study was to evaluate the effects of GM-CSF on post-transfer survival. Embryos were cultured with 10 ng mL–1 of either GM-CSF or cytokine-free CHO cell supernatant added to culture medium at Day 1 after insemination. Embryos were transferred at Day 7 to lactating dairy cows according to a timed embryo transfer protocol. Pregnancy was evaluated at approximately Day 45 of gestation. There was no significant difference in the proportion of embryos becoming blastocysts at Day 7 after insemination (34.8 v. 37.5% for the control and GM-CSF; SEM = 2.4%). There was also no difference in pregnancy rates between cows receiving control embryos (6/24; 25%) and cows receiving embryos treated with GM-CSF (8/35; 23%). A second study determined the effects of various concentrations of GM-CSF on the development of in vitro-produced embryos to the blastocyst stage. Embryos were cultured in 5% (v/v) oxygen (low oxygen) or atmospheric oxygen (21%, w/v; high oxygen) in the presence of 0, 1, 10, or 100 ng mL–1 of GM-CSF or an equivalent volume of cytokine-free CHO cell supernatant (control). The GM-CSF was added on either Day 1 or Day 5 after insemination. Cleavage rate was accessed on Day 3 after insemination. Stage of development was recorded at Day 7 and Day 8 after insemination. There was no effect of GM-CSF on cleavage rate. Addition of GM-CSF at Day 5 to embryos cultured in low or high oxygen increased the percentage of oocytes that became blastocysts at Day 7 (P < 0.01) and Day 8 (P < 0.01), but addition at Day 1 did not have a significant effect on blastocyst development. The greatest effects of GM-CSF occurred at a concentration of 10 ng mL–1. At this concentration, least squares means for the percentage of oocytes that became blastocysts at Day 7 were 13.9 v. 21.6% (control v. GM-CSF) when GM-CSF was added at Day 5, and 19.5 v. 21.5% when GM-CSF was added at Day 1. The percentage of blastocysts at Day 8 was 20.9 v. 28.7% when GM-CSF was added at Day 5, and 26.7 v. 27.5% when GM-CSF was added at Day 1. In conclusion, GM-CSF can affect the competence of embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage, but at the concentrations and times given, there was no evidence that GM-CSF enhanced embryo survival after transfer.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv20n1Ab208

© CSIRO 2008

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012