CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 19(1)

19 EFFECTS OF ESTRADIOL OR GnRH ON FOLLICULAR WAVE EMERGENCE AND PREGNANCY RATES FOR A CIDR-BASED TIMED AI PROTOCOL IN REPEAT BREEDER DAIRY COWS

G. H. Suh, U. H. Kim, T. Y. Hur, S. J. Kang, K. S. Baek, S. B. Park, H. S. Kim, H. G. Kang and I. H. Kim

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(1) 128 - 128

Abstract

Repeat breeding of a high yielding cow causes enormous economic loss to the dairy producers. In this study, we examined the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB) or GnRH on follicular wave emergence and follicular development, and on pregnancy rates for a CIDR-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in repeat breeder dairy cows. Repeat breeder cows received a CIDR device (InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand), with an injection of 1 mg EB (SY Esrone®; Samyang, Seoul, Korea) plus 50 mg progesterone (P4; SY Ovaron®; Samyang) (EB + P4 group, n = 36) or with an injection of 250 µg Gonadorelin (GnRH, Fertagyl®; Intervet, Boxmeer, The Netherlands) (GnRH group, n = 35) at the beginning of the experiment (Day 0). On Day 7, CIDR devices were removed and all cows received PGF (Lutalyse®; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium). Thereafter, cows in the EB + P4 group received an injection of 1 mg EB on Day 8, and TAI 30 h later; those in the GnRH group received an injection of 250 µg GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 19 h later. In a subset of cows for both groups (15 cows from each group), the ovaries of the cows were examined by transrectal ultrasonography (Sonoace 600 with 7.5 MHz linear-array transducer; Medison Co., Seoul, Korea) every 24 h from Days 0 to 8, on Day 10, and on Day 13 for the EB + P4 group, and every 24 h from Days 0 to 9, on Day 11, and on Day 14 for the GnRH group, to observe changes in ovarian structures (follicles and corpora lutea). Pregnancy was diagnosed 35 to 60 days after TAI, using both ultrasonography and rectal palpation. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact, Student's t-, and chi-square tests. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 12/15 EB + P4-treated and 13/15 GnRH-treated cows (P > 0.05). The mean diameters of preovulatory follicles were smaller (P < 0.05) in the EB + P4 group (12.1 ± 0.1 mm) than in the GnRH group (13.8 ± 0.1 mm). However, the proportion of cows with synchronized ovulation and pregnancy rates to TAI did not differ (P > 0.05) between the EB + P4 (11/15 and 19.4%, respectively) and the GnRH (13/15 and 34.3%, respectively) groups. In conclusion, treatment with either EB or GnRH for a CIDR-based TAI protocol in repeat breeder dairy cows results in synchronous follicular wave emergence, follicular development, and ovulation, and thus similar pregnancy rates to TAI.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv19n1Ab19

© CSIRO 2007

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012