CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 21(1)

29 PRODUCTION OF BOVINE CLONED EMBRYOS BY NUCLEAR TRANSFER USING VITRIFIED IMMATURE OOCYTES AS RECIPIENT CYTOPLASTS

F. Forell A B, C. Feltrin A, L. C. Santos A, A. D. Vieira A B, U. M. Costa B, M. Hölker C, J. L. Rodrigues A

A Laboratory of Embryology and Biotechnology of Reproduction, FAVET, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil;
B Department of Veterinary Medicine, CAV, UDESC, Lages, SC, Brazil;
C Institute of Animal Science, Animal Breeding and Husbandry Group, University of Bonn, Germany
 
 Full Text
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The cryopreservation of immature oocytes is a logistic alternative to make cytoplasts available throughout the year for cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Oocyte cryopreservation will help to overcome hurdles related to oocyte availability, seasonality, or sanitary constraints. The objective of this experiment was to determine the efficiency of vitrification of bovine immature oocytes for use as cytoplasts to produce clone embryos. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from bovine ovaries by slicing from a local abattoir were selected and vitrified prior to maturation. Vitrification and warming solutions and exposure times were as previously described (Vieira AD et al. 2008 Rep. Dom. Anim. 43, 314–318) with minor modifications. Groups of 15 COCs were loaded in a 5-μL vitrification solution microdrop in beveled-cut straws (0.5 mL), which were plunged into N2L. Following warming, vitrified and control (non-vitrified) oocytes were in vitro-matured for 22 h and 17 h, respectively (Oliveira ATD et al. 2005 Theriogenology 64, 1559–1572). After maturation, cumulus cells were removed and oocytes were selected by the presence of a polar body. Embryo reconstruction by SCNT, carried out by standard micromanipulation procedures using fibroblast cells from adult origin, and in vitro culture to the blastocyst stage (Day 7) were based on our established procedures (Forell F et al. 2008 Acta Sci. Vet. 36, 141–148). Data regarding oocyte recovery following cumulus cell removal, oocyte survival after micromanipulation, and maturation, fusion, cleavage (Day 2), and blastocyst (Day 7) rates were analyzed by the chi-square test. Oocyte recovery (73.0%, n = 558/764 v. 91.4%, n = 529/579), maturation (46.8%, n = 261/558 v. 65.8%, n = 348/529) and cleavage (47.2%, n = 60/127 v. 60.2%, n = 77/128) rates were lower in the vitrified than in the non-vitrified group, respectively (P < 0.05). Conversely, oocyte survival after micromanipulation (77.8% and 78.4%) and fusion (82.1% and 82.3%) and blastocyst (16.7%, 10/60 v. 23.4%, n = 18/77) rates were similar between vitrified and non-vitrified groups. However, the overall efficiency (blastocysts produced from selected COCs) was 3.4-fold lower for vitrified oocytes than controls. In conclusion, the vitrification of immature bovine oocytes was proven as a valuable procedure for the production of blastocysts by SCNT, providing that a strict selection is made following warming, being an alternative resource either for the use of large numbers of oocytes obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries or to overcome seasonal variations in oocyte supply for use in animal cloning.

   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012