CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > The Rangeland Journal   
The Rangeland Journal
  Rangeland Ecology & Management
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Contributors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


 

Open Access Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 31(1)

The climate change risk management matrix for the grazing industry of northern Australia

David H. Cobon A F, Grant S. Stone B, John O. Carter B, Joe C. Scanlan B D, Nathan R. Toombs A, Xike Zhang A, Jacqui Willcocks C, Greg M. McKeon B E

A Queensland Climate Change Centre of Excellence, Environmental Protection Agency, 203 Tor Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B Queensland Climate Change Centre of Excellence, Environmental Protection Agency, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia.
C Office of Climate Change, Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.
D Present address: Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 203 Tor Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
E Land & Water Australia Senior Research Fellowship.
F Corresponding author. Email: David.Cobon@climatechange.qld.gov.au
 
 Full Text
 PDF (403 KB)
 Supplementary Material
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The complexity, variability and vastness of the northern Australian rangelands make it difficult to assess the risks associated with climate change. In this paper we present a methodology to help industry and primary producers assess risks associated with climate change and to assess the effectiveness of adaptation options in managing those risks. Our assessment involved three steps. Initially, the impacts and adaptation responses were documented in matrices by ‘experts’ (rangeland and climate scientists). Then, a modified risk management framework was used to develop risk management matrices that identified important impacts, areas of greatest vulnerability (combination of potential impact and adaptive capacity) and priority areas for action at the industry level. The process was easy to implement and useful for arranging and analysing large amounts of information (both complex and interacting). Lastly, regional extension officers (after minimal ‘climate literacy’ training) could build on existing knowledge provided here and implement the risk management process in workshops with rangeland land managers. Their participation is likely to identify relevant and robust adaptive responses that are most likely to be included in regional and property management decisions. The process developed here for the grazing industry could be modified and used in other industries and sectors.

By 2030, some areas of northern Australia will experience more droughts and lower summer rainfall. This poses a serious threat to the rangelands. Although the impacts and adaptive responses will vary between ecological and geographic systems, climate change is expected to have noticeable detrimental effects: reduced pasture growth and surface water availability; increased competition from woody vegetation; decreased production per head (beef and wool) and gross margin; and adverse impacts on biodiversity. Further research and development is needed to identify the most vulnerable regions, and to inform policy in time to facilitate transitional change and enable land managers to implement those changes.

Keywords: impact, adaptation, vulnerability, policy, decision making, adaptive action.


   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012