CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
Journal Banner
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


 

Article << Previous     |         Contents Vol 43(1)

Soil bulk density evaluation by conventional and nuclear methods

L. C. Timm A B, L. F. Pires A, K. Reichardt A, R. Roveratti A, J. C. M. Oliveira A, O. O. S. Bacchi A

A Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, USP, C.P. 96, C.E.P. 13400-970, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
B Corresponding author. Email: lctimm@cena.usp.br
 
PDF (589 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Among the methods used to measure soil bulk density, the following have been prominent: paraffin sealed clod (PS), volumetric ring (VR), and the modern methods like gamma ray computed tomography (GCT) and the neutron/gamma surface gauge (SG). The objective of this work was to compare soil bulk density values obtained through these methods, with the aim of assisting researchers on the choice of the more appropriate method. For this, a 200-m spatial transect was chosen in an experimental area cultivated with coffee, belonging to ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. The SG readings were first taken in the field and thereafter soil samples were collected at 8 different points, spaced at 25 m, for the other methods. The lowest values of soil bulk density were obtained for the SG method (average 1.468 g/cm3) and the highest for the PS (average 1.685 g/cm3), which was similar to the GCT method (average 1.684 g/cm3). The average soil bulk density for the VR method, which has been used in soil science as a standard method, was 1.544 g/cm3. The Tukey test indicates that the PS and GCT methods do not differ significantly (P > 0.05). They do differ in comparison with VR and SG, which also do not differ among themselves.

Keywords: soil bulk density, computed tomography method, surface gauge method, volumetric ring method, paraffin sealed clods method.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013