Articles citing this paper
Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for genome resource banks composed of biomaterials from rare and endangered species
Pierre Comizzoli A C and William V. Holt B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
B Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, University of Sheffield, Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield S10 2SF, UK.
C Corresponding author. Email: comizzolip@si.edu
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 28(8) 1145-1160 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD15429
Submitted: 21 October 2015 Accepted: 2 February 2016 Published: 24 February 2016
14 articles found in Crossref database.
Factors That Explain the Utilization of the Nagoya Protocol Framework for Access and Benefit Sharing
Avilés-Polanco Gerzaín,
Jefferson David J.,
Almendarez-Hernández Marco Antonio, Beltrán-Morales Luis Felipe
Sustainability. 2019 11(20). p.5550
Genebank Operation in the Arena of Access and Benefit-Sharing Policies
Brink Martin, van Hintum Theo
Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020 10
Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock
Kumar Dharmendra,
Talluri Thirumala R,
Selokar Naresh L,
Hyder Iqbal, Kues Wilfried A
World Journal of Stem Cells. 2021 13(1). p.1
Access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: Implications of Nagoya Protocol on providers and users
Kariyawasam Kanchana, Tsai Matthew
The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2018 21(5-6). p.289
The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South
Deplazes-Zemp Anna,
Abiven Samuel,
Schaber Peter,
Schaepman Michael,
Schaepman-Strub Gabriela,
Schmid Bernhard,
Shimizu Kentaro K., Altermatt Florian
Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2018 2(6). p.917
Dry storage of mammalian spermatozoa and cells: state-of-the-art and possible future directions
Loi P.,
Anzalone D. A.,
Palazzese L.,
Dinnyés A.,
Saragusty J., Czernik M.
Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2021 33(2). p.82
Biobanking in amphibian and reptilian conservation and management: opportunities and challenges
Strand Julie,
Thomsen Helena,
Jensen Julie B.,
Marcussen Cecilie,
Nicolajsen Trine B.,
Skriver Mathias B.,
Søgaard Isabella M.,
Ezaz Tariq,
Purup Stig,
Callesen Henrik, Pertoldi Cino
Conservation Genetics Resources. 2020 12(4). p.709
Challenges on the Development of Biodiversity Biobanks: The Living Archives of Biodiversity
Angeles Nestly Anne C., Catap Elena S.
Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2023 21(1). p.5
Biomaterials repositories: the science and business of biobanking
Herrick Jason R.,
Mastromonaco Gabriela,
Songsasen Nucharin, Comizzoli Pierre
Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2016 28(8). p.iii
Female reproductive system morphology of crab‐eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and cryopreservation of genetic material for animal germplasm bank enrichment
Machado L. C.,
Roballo K. C. S.,
Cury F. S., Ambrósio C. E.
Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 2017 46(6). p.539
misMM: An Integrated Pipeline for Misassembly Detection Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing and Its Validation with BAC End Library Sequences and Gene Synteny
Ko Young-Joon,
Kim Jung Sun, Kim Sangsoo
Genomics & Informatics. 2017 15(4). p.128
Engaging with the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing: recommendations for noncommercial biodiversity researchers
Colella Jocelyn P,
Silvestri Luciana,
Súzan Gerardo,
Weksler Marcelo,
Cook Joseph A,
Lessa Enrique P, Rowe Kevin
Journal of Mammalogy. 2023 104(3). p.430
Breakthroughs and new horizons in reproductive biology of rare and endangered animal species
Comizzoli Pierre, Holt William V
Biology of Reproduction. 2019 101(3). p.514
Conservation-focused biobanks: A valuable resource for wildlife DNA forensics
Pérez-Espona Sílvia
Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments. 2021 1 p.100017
