Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Deficit in reproduction in polygynously mated females of the monogamous mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus

Patrick Gouat A B and Christophe Féron A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratoire d’Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée, Université Paris Nord, UMR CNRS 7153, 99, avenue Jean Baptiste Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France.

B Corresponding author. Email: patrick.gouat@leec.univ-paris13.fr

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17(6) 617-623 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD05042
Submitted: 4 April 2005  Accepted: 10 May 2005   Published: 1 July 2005

Abstract

In monogamous mound-building mice Mus spicilegus, facultative polygyny was observed in April, at the beginning of the reproductive season. In order to evaluate the cost of polygyny, we compared, under laboratory conditions, the reproductive success of trios and pairs composed of sister females mated with unrelated brother males. Females in trios were able to tolerate each other during the reproductive period and to reproduce with the same male under spatial constraints. Nevertheless, polygyny had a strong negative effect on the reproductive success of the females. The average number of young per litter was smaller in trio females than in paired females, whereas the interval between two successive litters was higher. As a result, the number of litters and the number of young per time unit were smaller in each of the trio females compared with paired females. Agonistic behaviour being absent in trios, our results strongly suggest that living in trios led to pheromonal production that affected the female physiological state and reproduction. Males of trios did not obtain a better reproductive success than males in pairs.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank Claude Baudoin and Nicolas Busquet for their critical reading of the manuscript, Lavinia Bruneau for revision of the English version of the manuscript, and Simone Demouron for excellent care of animals.


References

Bouteiller, C. , and Perrin, N. (2000). Individual reproductive success and effective population size in the greater white-toothed shrew Crocidura russula. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 267, 701–705.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Davies N. B. (1993). Mating systems. In ‘Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach’. (Eds J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies.) pp. 263–299. (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)

Dietz, J. M. , and Baker, A. J. (1993). Polygyny and female reproductive success in golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia. Anim. Behav. 46, 1067–1078.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dobson, F. S. , and Baudoin, C. (2002). Experimental tests of spatial association and kinship in monogamous mice (Mus spicilegus) and polygynous mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Can. J. Zool. 80, 980–986.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dobson, F. S. , Jacquot, C. , and Baudoin, C. (2000). An experimental test of kin association in the house mouse. Can. J. Zool. 78, 1806–1812.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). The mating system of callitrichid primates: I. Conditions for coevolution of pair bonding and twinning. Anim. Behav. 50, 1057–1070.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunn, P. O. , and Robertson, R. J. (1993). Extra-pair paternity in polygynous tree swallows. Anim. Behav. 45, 231–239.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Féron, C. , and Gheusi, G. (2003). Social regulation of reproduction in the female mound-builder mouse (Mus spicilegus). Physiol. Behav. 78, 717–722.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Freeland, J. R. , Hannon, S. J. , Dobush, G. , and Boag, P. T. (1995). Extra-pair paternity in willow ptarmigan broods: measuring costs of polygyny to males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36, 349–355.


Freeman-Gallant, C. R. (1997). Extra-pair paternity in monogamous and polygynous Savannah sparrows, Passerculus sandwichensis. Anim. Behav. 53, 397–404.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garza, J. C. , Dallas, J. , Duryadi, D. , Gerasimov, S. , Croset, H. , and Boursot, P. (1997). Social structure of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 6, 1009–1017.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Gouat, P. , Féron, C. , and Demouron, S. (2003a). Seasonal reproduction and delayed sexual maturity in mound-building mice Mus spicilegus. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 15, 187–195.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Gouat, P. , Katona, K. , and Poteaux, C. (2003b). Is the socio-spatial distribution of mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus, compatible with a monogamous mating system? Mammalia 67, 15–24.


Grønstøl, G. B. , Byrkjedal, I. , and Fiksen, Ø. (2003). Predicting polygynous settlement while incorporating varying female competitive strength. Behav. Ecol. 14, 257–267.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gudermuth, D. F. , McClintock, M. K. , and Moltz, H. (1984). Suppression of postpartum fertility in pairs of female rats sharing the same nesting environment. Physiol. Behav. 33, 257–260.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Hodges, K. E. , Mech, S. G. , and Wolff, J. O. (2002). Sex and the single vole: effects of social grouping on prairie vole reproductive success. Ethology 108, 871–884.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huck, U. W. , Bracken, A. C. , and Lisk, R. D. (1983). Female-induced pregnancy block in the golden hamster. Behav. Neural Biol. 38, 190–193.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Johnson, L. S. , Hicks, B. G. S. , and Masters, B. (2002). Increased cuckoldry as a cost of breeding late for male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behav. Ecol. 13, 670–675.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 39–69.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Kokita, T. , and Nakazono, A. (2001). Sexual conflict over mating system: the case of a pair-territorial filefish without parental care. Anim. Behav. 62, 147–155.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Komers, P. E. , and Brotherton, P. N. M. (1997). Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 264, 1261–1270.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

König, B. (1993). Maternal investment of communally nursing female house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Behav. Process. 30, 61–74.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

König, B. (1994a). Components of lifetime reproductive success in communally and solitarily nursing house mice: a laboratory study. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 275–283.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

König, B. (1994b). Fitness effects of communal rearing in house mice: the role of relatedness versus familiarity. Anim. Behav. 48, 1449–1457.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ma, W. , Miao, Z. , and Novotny, M. V. (1998). Role of the adrenal gland and adrenal-mediated chemosignals in suppression of estrus in the house mouse: the lee-boot effect revisited. Biol. Reprod. 59, 1317–1320.
PubMed |

Manning, C. J. , Dewsbury, D. A. , Wakeland, E. K. , and Potts, W. K. (1995). Communal nesting and communal nursing in house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus. Anim. Behav. 50, 741–751.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marchlewska-Koj, A. (1997). Sociogenic stress and rodent reproduction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21, 699–703.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Mock, D. W. , and Fujioka, M. (1990). Monogamy and long-term pair bonding in vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 39–43.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Møller, A. P. (1986). Mating systems among European passerines: a review. Ibis 128, 234–250.


Mundry, R. , and Fischer, J. (1998). Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect P values: examples from Animal Behaviour. Anim. Behav. 56, 256–259.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Orsini, P. , Bonhomme, F. , Britton-Davidian, J. , Croset, H. , Gerasimov, S. , and Thaler, L. (1983). Le complexe d'espèces du genre Mus en Europe Centrale et Orientale. II. Critères d'identification, répartition et caractéristiques écologiques. Z. Saugetierkd. 48, 86–95.


Patris, B. , and Baudoin, C. (1998). Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Anim. Behav. 56, 1465–1470.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Patris, B. , and Baudoin, C. (2000). A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implications for the mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Behav. Process. 51, 35–43.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patris, B. , Gouat, P. , Jacquot, C. , Christophe, N. , and Baudoin, C. (2002). Agonistic and sociable behaviors in the mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus: a comparative study with Mus musculus domesticus. Aggressive Behav. 28, 75–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pilastro, A. , Griggio, M. , Biddau, L. , and Mingozzi, T. (2002). Extrapair paternity as a cost of polygyny in the rock sparrow: behavioural and genetic evidence of the ‘trade-off’ hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 63, 967–974.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pribil, S. , and Picman, J. (1996). Polygyny in the red-winged blackbird: do females prefer monogamy or polygamy? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38, 183–190.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schlyter, F. , and Zhang, Q. H. (1996). Testing avian polygyny hypotheses in insects: harem size distribution and female egg gallery spacing in three Ips bark beetles. Oikos 76, 57–69.


Searcy, W. A. , and Yasukawa, K. (1989). Alternative models of territorial polygyny in birds. Am. Nat. 134, 323–343.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simeonovska-Nikolova, D. , and Gerasimov, S. (2000). Seasonal changes of some population characteristics of Mus spicilegus Petenyi in North Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. 52, 81–90.


Sokolov, V. E. , Kotenkova, E. V. , and Michailenko, A. G. (1998). Mus spicilegus. Mamm. Species 592, 1–6.


Suchomelová, E. , Munclinger, P. , and Frynta, D. (1998). New evidence of pseudosexual behaviour and female aggression in mice: neutral cage interactions in Mus spicilegus and Mus spretus (Rodentia: Muridae). Folia Zool. (Brno) 47, 241–247.


Unterholzner, K. , Willenig, R. , and Bauer, K. (2000). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ährenmaus Mus spicilegus Petényi, 1882. Biosystematics and Ecology Series 17, 7–108.


Van Loo, P. L. P. , Mol, J. A. , Koolhaas, J. M. , Van Zutphen, B. F. M. , and Baumans, V. (2001). Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of group size and cage size. Physiol. Behav. 72, 675–683.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Zabel, C. J. , and Taggart, S. J. (1989). Shift in red fox, Vulpes vulpes, mating system associated with El Niño in the Bering Sea. Anim. Behav. 38, 830–838.