Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Viewpoint: Measuring the effects of wildlife contraception: the argument for comparing apples with oranges

Jay F. Kirkpatrick

The Science and Conservation Center, 2100 South Shiloh Road, Billings MT 59106, USA. Email: jkirkpatrick@montana.net

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(4) 548-552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD06163
Submitted: 8 December 2006  Accepted: 26 March 2007   Published: 4 May 2007

Abstract

There are few wildlife populations existing today that can be supported without some form of management. Wildlife fertility control, as one option, has moved from the research stage to actual application with a number of species, including wild horses, urban deer, captive exotic species and even African elephants, but this approach remains controversial in many quarters. Strident debate has arisen over the possible effects of contraception on behaviour, genetics, stress and even management economics, among other parameters. Part of the debate arises from the fact that critics often fail to recognise that some form of alternative management will be applied, and a second problem arises when critics fail to identify and demand the same concern for the consequences of the alternative management approaches. Thus, any rational debate on the merits or possible effects of contraceptive management of wildlife must also recognise all alternative management approaches and apply the same concern and questions to these alternative approaches – including ‘no management’ – as are currently being applied to fertility control. Only then will the stewards of wildlife be in a position to make wise and informed decisions about management options.

Additional keyword: fertility control.


References

Anonymous  (1993). ‘Immunocontraception: A Wildlife Management Marvel.’ (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC.)

Asa C. A. 1996. Effects of contraceptives on behavior. In ‘Contraception in Wildlife’. (Eds P. N. Cohn, E. D. Plotka and U. S. Seal.) pp. 157–170. (The Edwin Mellon Press: Lewiston.)

Asa C. A., and Porton I. (Eds) 2005. ‘Wildlife Contraception: Issues, Methods and Applications.’ (John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.)

Bartholow J. M. 2004. ‘An Economic Analysis of Alternative Fertility Control and Associated Management Techniques for the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Herd.’ Technical Report. (U.S. Geological Survey: Fort Collins.)

Broderson J. R.1989A retrospective view of lesions associated with the use of Freund’s adjuvant.Lab. Anim. Sci.39400405

Delsink A.Van Altena J. J.Kirkpatrick J. F.Grobler D.Fayrer-Hosken R. A.2002Field applications of immunocontraception in African elephants (Loxodonta africana).Reproduction60117124


Frank K. M.Lyda R. O.Kirkpatrick J. F.2005Immunocontraception of captive exotic species. IV. Species differences in response to the porcine zona pellucida vaccine and the timing of booster inoculations.Zoo Biol.24349358
doi:10.1002/ZOO.20060

Grandy J. W.Rutberg A. T.2002An animal welfare view of wildlife contraception.Reproduction6017

Gill R. B., and Miller M. W. 1997. Thunder in the distance: the emerging policy debate over wildlife contraception. In ‘Contraception in Wildlife Management’, Technical Bulletin 1853. (Ed. T. J. Kreeger.) pp. 257–268. (US Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Denver.)

Haddad E. E.Anthony N. B.Bridges R.Whitfill C.Skeeles J. K.Thomas J.1994Evaluation of the humoral immune response to different antigens in Arkansas Regressor or Progressor chickens.Poult. Sci.73341345


Hardin G.1984Sentiment, guilt, and reason in the management of wild herds.Free Inquiry Winter3232–36.


Henik R. A.Olson P. N.Rosychuk R. A.1985Progestogen therapy in cats.Compendium Continuing Educ.7132141


Hinton M.Gaskell C. J.1977Non-neoplastic mammary hyperthrophy in the cat associated either with pregnancy or oral progestagen therapy.Vet. Rec.100277280


Hunter A., and Byers A. P. 1996. Immunological intervention in reproduction: potential for wildlife contraception. In ‘Contraception in Wildlife’. (Eds P. N. Cohn, E. D. Plotka and U.S. Seal.) pp. 101–118. (The Edwin Mellon Press: Lewsiton.)

Kaul R.Afzalpurkar A.Gupta S. K.1996Strategies for designing an immunocontraceptive vaccine based on zona pellucida synthetic peptides and recombinant antigen.J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl.50127134


Kirkpatrick J. F., and Frank K. M. 2005. Contraception in free-ranging wildlife. In ‘Wildlife Contraception: Issues, Methods, and Application’. (Eds C. A. Asa and I. Porton.) pp. 195–221. (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.)

Kirkpatrick J. F.Turner J. W.1997Urban deer contraception: The seven stages of grief.Wildl. Soc. Bull.25515519


Lyda R. O.Hall R.Kirkpatrick J. F.2005A comparison of Freund’s complete and Freund’s modified adjuvants used with a contraceptive vaccine in wild horses.J. Zoo Wildl. Med.36610616


McShea W. J.Monfort S. L.Hakim S.Kirkpatrick J. F.Liu I. K. M.Turner J. W.Chassy L.Munson L.1997Immunocontraceptive efficiency and the impact of contraception on the reproductive behaviors of white-tailed deer.J. Wildl. Manage.61560569


Munson L.Gardner I. A.Mason R. J.Chassy L. M.Seal U. S.2002Endometrial hyperplasia and mineralization in zoo felids treated with melengestrol actetate contraceptives.Vet. Pathol.39419427
doi:10.1354/VP.39-4-419

Munson L.Harrenstein L.Acton A. E.Graham P. A.Chassy L. M.Kirkpatrick J. F.2005Immunologic response and adverse reactions to Freund’s-adjuvanted porcine zona pleuucida immunocontraceptives in domestic cats.Vaccine2356465654doi:10.1016/J.VACCINE.2005.05.044

National Environmental Policy Act. Pub. L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, January 1. 1970, as amended by Pub. L. 94-52, July 3, 1975, Pub. L. 94-83, August 9, 1975, and Pub. L. 97-258 & 4(b), September 13, 1982.

Nettles V. F.1997Potential consequences and problems with wildlife contraceptives.Reprod. Fertil. Dev.9137143doi:10.1071/R96054

Oogjes G.1997Ethical aspects and dilemmas of fertility control of unwanted wildlife: An animal welfarist’s perspective.Reprod. Fertil. Dev.9163168doi:10.1071/R96061

Powell D. M.1999Preliminary evaluation of porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraception for behavioral effects in feral horses (Equus caballus).J. Appl. Anim. Welfare2321335doi:10.1207/S15327604JAWS0204_6

Robinson A. J.Jackson R.Kerr P.Merchant J.Parer I.Pech R.1997Progress toward using recombinant myxoma virus as a vector for fertility control in rabbits.Reprod. Fertil. Dev.97783doi:10.1071/R96067

Rutberg A. T. (2005) Deer contraception: what we know and what we don't. In ‘Humane Wildlife solutions: The Role of Immunocontraception’. (Ed. A. T. Rutberg). pp. 23–42. (Humane Society Press: Washington, D.C.)

Shlensky S.1991Birth control for deer.Deer Deer Hunt.158493

Tung K. S.Lou Y. H.Luo A. M.Ang J.1994Contraceptive vaccine assessment based on a murine ZP3 mini-autoantigen.Reprod. Fertil. Dev.6349355
doi:10.1071/RD9940349



Export Citation