Articles citing this paper
Defining and redefining monophyly: Haeckel, Hennig, Ashlock, Nelson and the proliferation of definitions
Tegan A. Vanderlaan A D , Malte C. Ebach A , David M. Williams B and John S. Wilkins C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Department of Life Sciences, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
C Department of Philosophy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: tegan_av@hotmail.com
Australian Systematic Botany 26(5) 347-355 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB13031
Submitted: 15 July 2013 Accepted: 13 November 2013 Published: 20 December 2013
13 articles found in Crossref database.
Ronald Brady and the cladists
Ebach Malte C., Williams David M.
Cladistics. 2020 36(2). p.218
Aphyly: identifying the flotsam and jetsam of systematics
Williams David M., Ebach Malte C.
Cladistics. 2018 34(4). p.459
Processed science
Farris James S.
Cladistics. 2018 34(6). p.684
The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics (2016)
Mini review: Diatom species as seen through a molecular window
Medlin Linda K.
Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2018 41(2). p.457
The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics (2016)
Cladistics (2020)
The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics (2016)
Cladistics (2020)
Establishing a Framework for a Natural Area Taxonomy
Ebach Malte C., Michaux Bernard
Acta Biotheoretica. 2017 65(3). p.167
Cladistics (2020)
Cladistics (2020)
Cladistics (2020)