Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Consequences of soil map unit uncertainty on environmental risk assessment

T. H. Webb A B and L. R. Lilburne A

A Landcare Research, PO Box 69, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: Webbt@LandcareResearch.co.nz

Australian Journal of Soil Research 43(2) 119-126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SR04055
Submitted: 22 April 2004  Accepted: 3 December 2004   Published: 1 April 2005

Abstract

Soil maps are being applied in modelling of environmental risk at a regional scale. Analysis of soil maps shows that there can be considerable uncertainty in map unit composition with consequent spatial variability in soil properties within map units. Uncertainty of map unit composition arises from a number of factors including map labels that do not reflect the mix of soil types present and imprecise location of map unit boundaries. Usually little, if any, information is supplied as to the extent and magnitude of these uncertainties. In this paper we develop datasets to quantify soil property variability for map units on the Canterbury Plains and use expert knowledge to quantify uncertainty in map unit composition for a small case-study area. We then apply Monte Carlo sampling to the estimated range of soil properties to input soil data into the GLEAMS simulation model to assess the effect of soil variability on nitrate leaching.

The simulation results show that there is considerable uncertainty in leaching from data derived from current soil map units. Even simple map units (map units characterised by a single soil type) have a wide range of potential leaching related to variation in soil profiles within the soil type. When map-unit inclusions were accounted for, variation in leaching risk can increase by 10–30%. Compound map units encompass the range of variability of the named component soils and there is a smaller increase in leaching variability in these units (compared with simple map units) when inclusions are added to the analysis. We discuss the implications of this study to the use of current soil survey data and make recommendations for future soil survey practice. In particular, greater effort is needed on description of the composition and reliability of soil map units.

Additional keywords: nitrate, water quality, simulation models, soil survey, GLEAMS, Monte Carlo.


References

Bakhsh A Kanwar RS Jaynes DB Colvin TS Ahuja LR 2000 Prediction of NO3-N losses with subsurface drainage water from manured and UAN-fertilized plots using GLEAMS. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 43 69 77

Bleecker M Degloria SD Hutson JL Bryant RB Wagenet RJ 1995 Mapping atrazine leaching potential with integrated environmental databases and simulation models. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50 388 394


Bouma J van Lanen HAJ Breeuwsma A Wosten HJM Kooistra MJ 1985 Soil survey data needs when studying modern land use problems. Soil Use and Management 2 125 130


Brubaker SC Hallmark CT 1991 A comparison of statistical methods for evaluating map unit composition. In ‘Spatial variabilities of soils and landforms’. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 28. 73 88 Soil Science Society of America Madison, WI


Close ME Pang L Watt JPC Vincent KW Naidu RT 1998 Leaching of picloram, atrazine and simazine through two New Zealand soils. Geoderma 84 45 63
DOI

Close ME Watt JPC Vincent KW 1999 Simulation of picloram, atrazine, and simazine transport through two New Zealand soils using LEACHM. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37 53 74

Cox JE 1978 Soils and agriculture of part Paparua County. New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin 34, DSIR, Wellington.


Di HJ Aylmore LAG 1997 Modeling the probabilities of groundwater contamination by pesticides. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61 17 23


Di HJ Kemp RA 1989 Variation in soil physical properties between and within morphologically defined series taxonomic units. Australian Journal of Soil Research 27 259 273


Fortin M-C Moon DE 1999 Errors associated with the use of soil survey data for estimating plant-available water at a regional scale. Agronomy Journal 91 984 990


Foussereau X Hornsby AG Brown RB 1993 Accounting for variability within map units when linking a pesticide fate model to soil survey. Geoderma 60 257 276
DOI

Griffiths E 1985 Interpretation of soil morphology for assessing moisture movement and storage. New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific Report 74, DSIR, Wellington.

Hansen S Thorsen M Pebesma EJ Kleeschulte S Svendsen H 1999 Uncertainty in simulated nitrate leaching due to uncertainty in input data. A case study. Soil Use and Management 15 167 175


Hewitt AE 1998 ‘New Zealand soil classification’. Landcare Research Science Series No. 1. 2nd Manaaki Whenua Press Lincoln, New Zealand


Hole FD Campbell JB 1985 ‘Soil landscape analysis’. Rowman and Allanheld Totowa, NJ


Karageorgis D 1980 Soil variability and related crop productivity within a sample area of the Templeton soil mapping unit. MAgric. thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.


Kear BS Gibbs HS Miller RB 1967 Soils of the downs and plains of Canterbury and North Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin 14, DSIR, Wellington.


Knisel WG 1993 GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects Of Agricultural Management Systems, version 2.10.
University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experimental Station, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Publication No. 5.

Lee R Bailey JM Northey RD Barker PR Gibson EJ 1974 Variation in some chemical and physical properties of three related soil types: Dannevirke silt loam, Kiwitea silt loam, and Marton silt loam. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 18 29 36


Leonard RA Knisel WG Still DA 1987 GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 30 1403 1418


Lilburne LR Webb TH 2002 Effect of soil variability, within and between soil taxonomic units, on simulated nitrate leaching under arable farming, New Zealand. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40 1187 1199
DOI

Lilburne LR Webb TH Francis GS 2003 Relative effect of climate, soil, and management on risk of nitrate leaching under wheat production in Canterbury, New Zealand. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41 699 709 DOI

Nofziger DL Chen J-S Hornsby AG 1996 Uncertainty in pesticide leaching risk due to soil variability. ‘Data reliability and risk assessment in soil interpretations’. Soil Science Society of America Madison, WI Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 47. pp. 99–129.

Petach MC Wagenet RJ DeGloria SD 1991 Regional water flow and pesticide leaching using simulations with spatially distributed data. Geoderma 48 245 269
DOI

Rogowski AS 2000 Incorporating soil variability into a spatially distributed model of percolate accounting. ‘Quantifying spatial uncertainty in natural resources: theory and applications for GIS and remote sensing’. Mowrer HT Congalton R 183 202 Ann Arbor Press Chelsea, MI

Rogowski AS Wolf JK 1994 Incorporating variability into soil map unit delineations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58 163 174


Shirmohammadi A Knisel WG 1989 Irrigated agriculture and water quality in the South. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 115 823 838


Soil Survey Staff 1998 ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 8th USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Washington, DC


Soutter M Musy A 1998 Coupling 1D Monte Carlo simulations and geostatistics to assess groundwater vulnerability to pesticide contamination on a regional scale. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 32 25 39
DOI

SYSTAT 1996 ‘Systat 6.0 for Windows.’ SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL

Taylor NH Pohlen IJ 1970
Soil survey method: a New Zealand handbook for the field study of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin 25, DSIR, Wellington.

Wagenet RJ Hutson JL 1996 Scale-dependency of solute transport modeling/GIS applications. Journal of Environmental Quality 25 499 510


Webb TH Claydon JJ Harris SR 2000 Quantifying variability of soil physical properties within map units to address modern land-use issues on the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38 1115 1129
DOI

Webb TH Lilburne LR 1999 Use of the LEACHM model and the DRASTIC index to map relative risk of groundwater contamination by pesticide leaching. Journal of Hydrology 38 271 288 NZ

Webb TH Lilburne LR Francis GS 2001 Validation of the GLEAMS simulation model for estimating net nitrogen mineralisation and nitrate leaching under cropping in Canterbury. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39 1015 1025
DOI

Workman SR Ward AD Knisel WG 1992 Assessing the leaching potential of herbicides at the Ohio MESA. ‘Irrigation and Drainage session at Water Forum′92’. Engman T 413 418 American Society of Civil Engineers Baltimore, MD

Wu QJ Ward AD Workman SR 1996 Using GIS in simulation of nitrate leaching from heterogeneous unsaturated soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 25 526 534




Export Citation Cited By (10)