Effects of time-controlled grazing on runoff and sediment loss
Gholamreza Sanjari A B E , Bofu Yu D , Hossein Ghadiri A , Cyril A. A. Ciesiolka C and Calvin W. Rose AA Australian River Institute, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
B Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran.
C Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Toowoomba, Qld 4355, Australia.
D School of Engineering, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: G.Sanjari@griffith.edu.au
Australian Journal of Soil Research 47(8) 796-808 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR09032
Submitted: 8 February 2008 Accepted: 21 August 2009 Published: 11 December 2009
Abstract
The time-controlled rotational grazing (TC grazing) has become popular in Australia and elsewhere in the world to provide graziers and ranchers with improved productivity over traditional practices. However, this grazing system, which involves short periods of intensive grazing, has raised concerns about sustainability and environmental impacts on water and soil resources, and ecosystem health generally. A runoff experiment at the catchment scale was established on the grazing property ‘Currajong’ in the south-east region of Queensland, Australia, to investigate the effects of continuous and TC grazing on runoff and sediment generation from 2001 to 2006.
Sediment loss was reduced significantly under TC grazing compared with continuous grazing irrespective of the size of runoff events. This effect was more pronounced in the catchments with soils of gentler slopes and greater depths. The reduction in soil erosion was achieved despite the fact that the increase in ground cover under TC grazing had little effect on runoff coefficient or runoff depth. Decrease in runoff in relation to the increase in surface cover only occurred for small events, whereas for large rainfall events, runoff generated irrespective of the level of ground cover.
This study showed that ground cover is a key driver in reducing sediment concentration, resulting in a significantly lower sediment loss under TC grazing. In the study area a minimum of 70% of surface cover as a threshold appeared to be needed to efficiently protect the soil surface from erosive forces of rain and runoff and to control soil erosion. The results also indicate that TC grazing has a superior capability to produce and maintain a higher level of ground cover (up to 90%) than continuous grazing (up to 65%). The long rest periods in TC grazing are seen as the major contributor to soil and pasture recovery after intensive defoliations by grazing animals, leading to an increase in above-ground organic material and thus surface cover over time.
Additional keywords: rainfall, erosion, ground cover, pasture, Queensland, Traprock.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Queensland Inglewood Landcare for their support and Natural Heritage Trust for the grant awarded to Cyril Ciesiolka. They also thank Rick and Louise Goodrich, the owners of the property, as well as Mr Eugene Creek for his assistance with field work.
Abrahams AD,
Anthony JP, Wainwright J
(1995) Effects of vegetation change on interrill runoff and erosion, Walnut-Gulch, Southern Arizona. Geomorphology 13, 37–48.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed Feb. 2008).
McGinty WA,
Smeins FE, Merrill LB
(1979) Influence of soil, vegetation, and grazing management on infiltration rate and sediment production of Edwards Plateau rangeland. Journal of Range Management 32, 33–37.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McIvor JG,
Williams J, Gardener CJ
(1995) Pasture management influences runoff and soil movement in the semiarid tropics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 55–65.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer LD,
Wischmeier WH, Foster GR
(1970) Mulch rates required for erosion control on steep slopes. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34, 928–931.
Mwendera EJ, Saleem MAM
(1997) Infiltration rates, surface runoff, and soil loss as influenced by grazing pressure in the Ethiopian highlands. Soil Use and Management 13, 29–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pan CZ, Shangguan ZP
(2006) Runoff hydraulic characteristics and sediment generation in sloped grassplots under simulated rainfall conditions. Journal of Hydrology 331, 178–185.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Proffitt APB,
Jarvis RJ, Bendotti S
(1995) The impact of sheep trampling and stocking rate on the physical-properties of a Red Duplex soil with 2 initially different structures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 733–747.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Puigdefábregas J
(2005) The role of vegetation patterns in structuring runoff and sediment fluxes in drylands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30, 133–147.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rauzi F, Hanson DL
(1966) Water intake and runoff as affected by intensity of grazing. Journal of Range Management 19, 351–356.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rhoades ED,
Locke LF,
Taylor HM, Mcllvain EH
(1964) Water intake on a sandy range as affected by 20 years of differential cattle stocking rates. Journal of Range Management 17, 185–190.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Rogers RD, Schumm SA
(1991) The effect of sparse vegetation cover on erosion and sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology 123, 19–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rose CW
(1985a) Developments in soil erosion and deposition models. Advances in Soil Science 2, 1–63.
Sanjari G,
Ghadiri H,
Ciesiolka CAA, Yu B
(2008) Comparing the effects of continuous and time-controlled grazing systems on soil characteristics in Southeast Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 348–358.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singer MJ, Blackard J
(1977) Evaluation of wild oat straw as a soil erosion retardant using simulated rainfall. Agronomy Journal 69, 811–814.
Snyman HA, Van Rensburg WLJ
(1986) Effect of slope and plant cover on run-off, soil loss and water use efficiency of natural veld. Journal of the Grassland Society of South Africa 3, 153–158.
Wahba G, Wendelberger J
(1980) Some new mathematical methods for variational objective analysis using splines and cross validation. Monthly Weather Review 108, 1122–1143.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warren SD,
Nevill MB,
Blackburn WH, Garza NE
(1986a) Soil response to trampling under intensive rotation grazing. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50, 1336–1341.
Warren SD,
Thurow TL,
Blackburn WH, Garza NE
(1986b) The influence of livestock trampling under intensive rotation grazing on soil hydrologic characteristics. Journal of Range Management 39, 491–495.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weltz M, Wood MK
(1986a) Short-duration grazing in Central New Mexico – Effects on sediment production. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41, 262–266.
Weltz M, Wood MK
(1986b) Short duration grazing in Central New Mexico – Effects on infiltration rates. Journal of Range Management 39, 365–368.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wood MK, Blackburn WH
(1981) Grazing systems: their influence on infiltration rates in the Rolling Plains of Texas. Journal of Range Management 34, 331–335.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yu B,
Ciesiolka CAA,
Rose CW, Coughlan KJ
(1997) Note on sampling errors in the rainfall and runoff data collected using tipping bucket technology. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40, 1305–1309.
Yu B, Rosewell CJ
(1996a) An assessment of a daily rainfall erosivity model for New South Wales. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 139–152.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yu B, Rosewell CJ
(1996b) Rainfall erosivity estimation using daily rainfall amounts for South Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 721–733.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou Q,
Robson M, Pilesjo P
(1998) On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19, 1815–1820.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zobisch MA
(1993) Erosion susceptibility and soil loss on grazing lands in some semiarid and subhumid locations of Eastern Kenya. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48, 445–448.
