Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relationships, social networks and the emergence of recovery-based river management: implications for practice and policy

Simon Mould https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0029-8719 A C , Kirstie Fryirs https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-3384 A and Richard Howitt B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.

B Department of Geography and Planning, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: simon.mould1@gmail.com

Marine and Freshwater Research 72(4) 481-492 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20065
Submitted: 2 March 2020  Accepted: 20 July 2020   Published: 2 September 2020

Abstract

Sustainable, science-based freshwater-ecosystem management requires strong and integrated systems and policies for governance and knowledge management. Often the focus is on availability of technical information, whereas deeper knowledge development, sharing and implementation also require social networks that cross disciplinary and organisational boundaries. This research investigated emergence and development of river-rehabilitation practices based on principles of geomorphic river recovery through periods of institutional, political and policy change. Document analysis and oral testimony indicated that informal or emergent social networks, forming communities of practice, have been critical for developing, sharing and implementing river-recovery principles through these phases of change. However, social networks and the tacit knowledge held by networks and individuals are insecure and may be vulnerable to loss if investments are not made in relationships and the ‘relational resources’ that provide resilience during periods of change. We see social relationships as critical to realisation of integrative, science-based freshwater-ecosystem management and governance in the long term and across local, state, national and international scales. This must be supported by policy that recognises the value of cross-organisational connection and provides institutional stability, while offering sufficient flexibility and openness for collaborative and adaptive governance in management of freshwater ecosystems.

Additional keywords: communities of practice, geomorphology, governance, institutional change, river recovery, social capital.


References

Alston, M. (2002). Social capital in rural Australia. Rural Society 12, 93–104.
Social capital in rural Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ambrosini, V. (2001). Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies 38, 811–829.
Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ashmore, P. (2015). Towards a sociogeomorphology of rivers. Geomorphology 251, 149–156.
Towards a sociogeomorphology of rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Aston, H. (2013). DPI ‘witch hunt’ over interview. The Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney). Available at https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/dpi-witch-hunt-over-interview-20130216-2ejs7.html [verified 3 August 2020].

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002). Yearbook Australia, 2002. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1301.02002?OpenDocument [verified 14 July 2020].

Bebbington, A., and Perreault, T. (1999). Social capital, development and access to resources in highland Ecuador. Economic Geography 75, 395–418.
Social capital, development and access to resources in highland Ecuador.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beechie, T. J., Pollock, M. M., and Baker, S. (2008). Channel incision, evolution and potential recovery in the Walla Walla and Tucannon River basins, northwestern USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33, 784–800.
Channel incision, evolution and potential recovery in the Walla Walla and Tucannon River basins, northwestern USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bodin, Ö., and Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19, 366–374.
The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bodin, Ö., Crona, B. I., and Ernston, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11, r2.
Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brierley, G., and Fryirs, K. (2005). ‘Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK.)

Brierley, G., and Fryirs, K. (2008). Moves toward an era of river repair. In ‘River Futures: An Integrative Scientific Approach to River Repair’. (Eds G. Brierley and K. Fryirs.) pp. 3–12. (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.)

Brierley, G., and Fryirs, K. (2009). Don’t fight the site: three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning. Environmental Management 43, 1201–1218.
Don’t fight the site: three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19301067PubMed |

Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., Cullum, C., Tadaki, M., Huang, H. Q., and Blue, B. (2013). Reading the landscape: integrating the theory and practice of geomorphology to develop place-based understandings of river systems. Progress in Physical Geography 37, 601–621.
Reading the landscape: integrating the theory and practice of geomorphology to develop place-based understandings of river systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Coates, D., and Connor, R. (2018) ‘The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-based Solutions for Water.’ (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France.)

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.
Social capital in the creation of human capital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies, K. K., Fisher, K. T., Dickson, M. E., Thrush, S. F., and Le Heron, R. (2015). Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecology and Society 20, 37.
Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis, D. F., and Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Relational resources in interorganizational exchange: the effects of trade equity and brand equity. Journal of Retailing 84, 435–448.
Relational resources in interorganizational exchange: the effects of trade equity and brand equity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doyle, M. W., Lave, R., Robertson, M. M., and Ferguson, J. (2013). River federalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103, 290–298.
River federalism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Erskine, W. (1992). Channel response to large-scale river training works: Hunter River, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 7, 261–278.
Channel response to large-scale river training works: Hunter River, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Erskine, W. D., and Webb, A. A. (2003). Desnagging to resnagging: new directions in river rehabilitation in southeastern Australia. River Research and Applications 19, 233–249.
Desnagging to resnagging: new directions in river rehabilitation in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 441–473.
Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Freeney, Y., and Fellenz, M. R. (2013). Work engagement, job design and the role of the social context at work: exploring antecedents from a relational perspective. Human Relations 66, 1427–1445.
Work engagement, job design and the role of the social context at work: exploring antecedents from a relational perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fryirs, K., and Brierley, G. (2013). ‘Geomorphic Analysis of River Systems: An Approach to Reading the Landscape.’ (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA.)

Fryirs, K. A., and Brierley, G. J. (2016). Assessing the geomorphic recovery potential of rivers: forecasting future trajectories of adjustment for use in management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 3, 727–748.
Assessing the geomorphic recovery potential of rivers: forecasting future trajectories of adjustment for use in management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fryirs, K., Chessman, B., Hillman, M., Outhet, D., and Spink, A. (2008). The Australian river management experience. In ‘River Futures: An Integrative Scientific Approach to River Repair’. (Eds G. Brierley and K. Fryirs.) pp. 149–173. (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.)

Fryirs, K., Brierley, G. J., and Erskine, W. D. (2012). Use of ergodic reasoning to reconstruct the historical range of variability and evolutionary trajectory of rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37, 763–773.
Use of ergodic reasoning to reconstruct the historical range of variability and evolutionary trajectory of rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fryirs, K., Chessman, B., and Rutherfurd, I. (2013). Progress, problems and prospects in Australian river repair. Marine and Freshwater Research 64, 642–654.
Progress, problems and prospects in Australian river repair.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fryirs, K. A., Brierley, G. J., Hancock, F., Cohen, T. J., Brooks, A. P., Reinfelds, I., Cook, N., and Raine, A. (2018). Tracking geomorphic recovery in process-based river management. Land Degradation & Development 29, 3221–3244.
Tracking geomorphic recovery in process-based river management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grabowski, R. C., Surian, N., and Gurnell, A. M. (2014). Characterizing geomorphological change to support sustainable river restoration and management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 1, 483–512.
Characterizing geomorphological change to support sustainable river restoration and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Groll, M. (2017). The passive river restoration approach as an efficient tool to improve the hydromorphological diversity of rivers: case study from two river restoration projects in the German lower mountain range. Geomorphology 293, 69–83.
The passive river restoration approach as an efficient tool to improve the hydromorphological diversity of rivers: case study from two river restoration projects in the German lower mountain range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., and Light, S. (Eds) (1995). ‘Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions.’ (Columbia University Press: New York, USA.)

Hassenforder, E., Clavreul, D., Akhmouch, A., and Ferrand, N. (2018). What’s the middle ground? Institutionalized vs. emerging water-related stakeholder engagement processes. International Journal of Water Resources Development 35, 1–18.

Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10, 328–337.
Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review 60, 488–497.
The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kietäväinen, A., and Tuulentie, S. (2018). Trust matters: social capital in herding corporation in Finland. Society & Natural Resources 31, 1064–1079.
Trust matters: social capital in herding corporation in Finland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kondolf, G. M. (2011). Setting goals in river restoration: When and where can the river ‘heal itself’? In ‘Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses and Tools’. (Eds A. Simon, S. J. Bennett and J. M. Castro.) pp. 29–43. (American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA.)

Krippendorff, K. (2003). ‘Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.’ (Sage: Thosand Oaks, CA, USA.)

Lave, R., Wilson, M. W., Barron, E. S., Biermann, C., Carey, M. A., Duvall, C. S., Johnson, L., Lane, K. M., McClintock, N., Munroe, D., Pain, R., Proctor, J., Rhoads, B. L., Robertson, M. M., Rossi, J., Sayre, N. F., Simon, G., Tadaki, M., and Van Dyke, C. (2014). Intervention: critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer. Geographe Canadien 58, 1–10.
Intervention: critical physical geography.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., Ostrom, E., Pell, A. N., Lubchenco, J., Taylor, W. W., Ouyang, Z., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., and Provencher, W. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio 36, 639–649.
Coupled human and natural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18240679PubMed |

Moore, H. E., and Rutherfurd, I. D. (2017). Lack of maintenance is a major challenge for stream restoration projects. River Research and Applications 33, 1387–1399.
Lack of maintenance is a major challenge for stream restoration projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mould, S., and Fryirs, K. (2018). Contextualising the trajectory of geomorphic river recovery with environmental history to support river management. Applied Geography 94, 130–146.
Contextualising the trajectory of geomorphic river recovery with environmental history to support river management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mould, S. A., Fryirs, K., and Howitt, R. (2018). Practicing sociogeomorphology: relationships and dialogue in river research and management. Society & Natural Resources 31, 106–120.
Practicing sociogeomorphology: relationships and dialogue in river research and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mould, S., Fryirs, K., Lovett, S., and Howitt, R. (2020a). Supporting champions in river management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 7, .

Mould, S. A., Fryirs, K. A., and Howitt, R. (2020b). The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation. Ecology and Society 25, 17.
The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Health and Medical Research Council (2018). ‘National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.’ (National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Onyx, J., and Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36, 23–42.
Measuring social capital in five communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., and Taillieu, T. (2007). Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12, art.5.
Social learning and water resources management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paton, S., Curtis, A., McDonald, G., and Woods, M. (2004). Regional natural resource management: is it sustainable. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 11, 259–267.
Regional natural resource management: is it sustainable.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pretty, J., and Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development 29, 209–227.
Social capital and the environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. The 1995 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture. PS, Political Science & Politics 28, 664–683.
Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. The 1995 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Raine, A. W., and Gardiner, J. (1995). ‘Rivercare: Guidelines for Ecologically Sustainable Management of Rivers and Riparian Vegetation.’ (Land & Water Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Richards, K., Brasington, J., and Hughes, F. (2002). Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47, 559–579.
Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rinaldi, M., Piegay, H., and Surian, N. (2011). Geomorphological approaches for river management and restoration in Italian and French rivers. In ‘Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses and Tools’. (Eds A. Simon, S. J. Bennett, and J. M. Castro.) pp. 95–113. (American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA.)

Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F., and Bussettini, M. (2015). A methodological framework for hydromorphological assessment, analysis and monitoring (IDRAIM) aimed at promoting integrated river management. Geomorphology 251, 122–136.
A methodological framework for hydromorphological assessment, analysis and monitoring (IDRAIM) aimed at promoting integrated river management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roux, D. J., Rogers, K. H., Biggs, H. C., Ashton, P. J., and Sergeant, A. (2006). Bridging the science-management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society 11, 4.
Bridging the science-management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rutherfurd, I., Jerie, K., Walker, M., and Marsh, N. (1999). Don’t raise the Titanic: how to set priorities for stream rehabilitation. In ‘2nd Australian Stream Management Conference’. Adelaide, S. Aust. (Eds I. Rutherfurd and R. Bartley.) pp. 527–532. (River Basin Management Society: Melbourne, Vic.)

Rutherfurd, I. D., Jerie, K., and Marsh, N. (2000). ‘A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams. Vol. 2.’ (Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Scorpio, V., Aucelli, P. P. C., Giano, S. I., Pisano, L., Robustelli, G., Rosskopf, C. M., and Schiattarella, M. (2015). River channel adjustments in Southern Italy over the past 150 years and implications for channel recovery. Geomorphology 251, 77–9010.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2015.07.008

Spink, A., Fryirs, K., and Brierley, G. (2009). The relationship between geomorphic river adjustment and management actions over the last 50 years in the Upper Hunter Catchment, NSW, Australia. River Research and Applications 25, 904–928.
The relationship between geomorphic river adjustment and management actions over the last 50 years in the Upper Hunter Catchment, NSW, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spink, A., Hillman, M., Fryirs, K., Brierley, G., and Lloyd, K. (2010). Has river rehabilitation begun? Social perspectives from the Upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Geoforum 41, 399–409.
Has river rehabilitation begun? Social perspectives from the Upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Urban, M. A. (2005). Values and ethical beliefs regarding agricultural drainage in central Illinois, USA. Society & Natural Resources 18, 173–189.
Values and ethical beliefs regarding agricultural drainage in central Illinois, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ward, J. V., Tockner, K., Uehlinger, U., and Malard, F. (2001). Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17, 311–323.
Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In ‘Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice’. (Ed. C. Blackmore.) pp. 179–198. (Springer: London, UK.)

Wheaton, J. M., Bennett, S. N., Bouwes, N., Maestas, J. D., and Shahverdian, S. M. (Eds) (2019). ‘Low-Tech Process-based Restoration of Riverscapes: Design Manual Version 1.0.’ (Utah State University Restoration Consortium: Logan, UT, USA.)

Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., and Wilcox, A. C. (2015). The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research 51, 5974–5997.
The science and practice of river restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |