Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Conflicting perceptions of quota-based systems in Australian fisheries

Sean Pascoe https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-2649 A * , Eriko Hoshino B , Trevor Hutton A and Alistair J. Hobday B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, Saint Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

B CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, 3–4 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Tas. 7004, Australia.

* Correspondence to: sean.pascoe@csiro.au

Handling Editor: Max Finlayson

Marine and Freshwater Research 73(4) 419-427 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21227
Submitted: 4 August 2021  Accepted: 18 December 2021   Published: 7 February 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Individual transferable quotas (ITQs) have been implemented in many fisheries in Australia and elsewhere, primarily in response to stock management challenges. However, unanticipated economic and social outcomes are also apparent, particularly for small-scale fishers. In December 2020, the Australian Senate initiated an Inquiry into the operations of ITQ management systems in Australian fisheries. Submissions were made by individual fishers, industry organisations, fisheries managers, research groups and others, detailing their perceptions on performance in terms of environmental, social and economic outcomes. We summarise the key points raised in the submissions, identifying areas where claims and perceptions were similar or diverse for the different groups. We find that the individual fishers who made submissions were largely negative about the impacts of ITQs in terms of all three outcome domains, whereas industry organisations and others were mostly positive overall. Social issues, particularly ownership of quota by non-fishers (i.e. investors), were flagged by most groups as a problem with the current system. Addressing these concerns with ITQ systems may be difficult. Enshrinement as user rights means that small-scale fisheries and local communities may be disadvantaged in the long-term due to past trade-offs favouring economic and ecological sustainability over social impacts.

Keywords: economic impacts, quota managed fisheries, ITQs, lease-dependent, senate inquiry, social impacts, stakeholder perceptions, resource sustainability.


References

Agnarsson, S, Matthiasson, T, and Giry, F (2016). Consolidation and distribution of quota holdings in the Icelandic fisheries. Marine Policy 72, 263–270.
Consolidation and distribution of quota holdings in the Icelandic fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Branch, TA (2009). How do individual transferable quotas affect marine ecosystems? Fish and Fisheries 10, 39–57.
How do individual transferable quotas affect marine ecosystems?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brinson, AA, and Thunberg, EM (2016). Performance of federally managed catch share fisheries in the United States. Fisheries Research 179, 213–223.
Performance of federally managed catch share fisheries in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Christy FTJ (1973) Fisherman quotas: a tentative suggestion for domestic management. Report, National Technical Information Service, Washington, DC, USA.

Chu, C (2009). Thirty years later: the global growth of ITQs and their influence on stock status in marine fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 10, 217–230.
Thirty years later: the global growth of ITQs and their influence on stock status in marine fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Copes, P, and Charles, A (2004). Socioeconomics of individual transferable quotas and community-based fishery management. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33, 171–181.
Socioeconomics of individual transferable quotas and community-based fishery management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Costello, C, Gaines, SD, and Lynham, J (2008). Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science 321, 1678–1681.
Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18801999PubMed |

Geen, G, and Nayar, M (1988). Individual transferable quotas in the Southern Bluefin tuna fishery: an economic appraisal. Marine Resource Economics 5, 365–387.
Individual transferable quotas in the Southern Bluefin tuna fishery: an economic appraisal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grafton, RQ, Squires, D, and Fox, KJ (2000). Private property and economic efficiency: a study of a common-pool resource. The Journal of Law & Economics 43, 679–714.
Private property and economic efficiency: a study of a common-pool resource.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grafton, RQ, Arnason, R, Bjørndal, T, Campbell, D, Campbell, HF, Clark, CW, Connor, R, Dupont, DP, Hannesson, R, Hilborn, R, Kirkley, JE, Kompas, T, Lane, DE, Munro, GR, Pascoe, S, Squires, D, Steinshamn, SI, Turris, BR, and Weninger, Q (2006). Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63, 699–710.
Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hannesson, R (1996). On ITQs: an essay for the special issue of reviews in fish biology and fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6, 91–96.
On ITQs: an essay for the special issue of reviews in fish biology and fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hoshino, E, van Putten, I, Pascoe, S, and Vieira, S (2020a). Does quota ownership affect perceptions of fishery performance? Marine Policy 120, 104155.
Does quota ownership affect perceptions of fishery performance?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hoshino, E, van Putten, I, Pascoe, S, and Vieira, S (2020b). Individual transferable quotas in achieving multiple objectives of fisheries management. Marine Policy 113, 103744.
Individual transferable quotas in achieving multiple objectives of fisheries management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kulevicz, RA, Porfirio, GEO, da Oliveira, OS, Zavala, AAZ, da Silva, BA, and Constantino, M (2020). Influence of sustainability reports on social and environmental issues: bibliometric analysis and the word cloud approach. Environmental Reviews 28, 380–386.
Influence of sustainability reports on social and environmental issues: bibliometric analysis and the word cloud approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marchal, P, Andersen, JL, Aranda, M, Fitzpatrick, M, Goti, L, Guyader, O, Haraldsson, G, Hatcher, A, Hegland, TJ, Le Floc’h, P, Macher, C, Malvarosa, L, Maravelias, CD, Mardle, S, Murillas, A, Nielsen, JR, Sabatella, R, Smith, ADM, Stokes, K, Thoegersen, T, and Ulrich, C (2016). A comparative review of fisheries management experiences in the European union and in other countries worldwide: Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand. Fish and Fisheries 17, 803–824.
A comparative review of fisheries management experiences in the European union and in other countries worldwide: Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matulich, SC, and Sever, M (1999). Reconsidering the initial allocation of ITQs: the search for a pareto-safe allocation between fishing and processing sectors. Land Economics 75, 203–219.
Reconsidering the initial allocation of ITQs: the search for a pareto-safe allocation between fishing and processing sectors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCay, BJ (1995). Social and ecological implications of ITQs: an overview. Ocean and Coastal Management 28, 3–22.
Social and ecological implications of ITQs: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Minderoo Foundation (2021) The global fishing index: assessing the sustainability of the World’s marine fisheries. Report, Minderoo Foundation, Perth, WA, Australia.

Moloney, DG, and Pearse, PH (1979). Quantitative rights as an instrument for regulating commercial fisheries. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 36, 859–866.
Quantitative rights as an instrument for regulating commercial fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munk-Madsen, E (1998). The Norwegian fishing quota system: another patriarchal construction? Society & Natural Resources 11, 229–240.
The Norwegian fishing quota system: another patriarchal construction?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pascoe S, Hoshino E, van Putten I, Vieira S (2019) Retrospective assessment of ITQs to inform research needs and to improve their future design and performance. Report, FRDC, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Pinkerton, E, and Edwards, DN (2009). The elephant in the room: the hidden costs of leasing individual transferable fishing quotas. Marine Policy 33, 707–713.
The elephant in the room: the hidden costs of leasing individual transferable fishing quotas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plagányi, ÉE, van Putten, I, Hutton, T, Deng, RA, Dennis, D, Pascoe, S, Skewes, T, and Campbell, RA (2013). Integrating indigenous livelihood and lifestyle objectives in managing a natural resource. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 3639–3644.
Integrating indigenous livelihood and lifestyle objectives in managing a natural resource.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23401546PubMed |

Roberts, CW (2000). A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis. Quality & Quantity 34, 259–274.
A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, ADM, and Smith, DC (2001). A complex quota-managed fishery: Science and management in Australia’s south east fishery. Introduction and overview. Marine and Freshwater Research 52, 353–360.
A complex quota-managed fishery: Science and management in Australia’s south east fishery. Introduction and overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sumaila, UR (2010). A cautionary note on individual transferable quotas. Ecology and Society 15, art36.
A cautionary note on individual transferable quotas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Putten, I, and Gardner, C (2010). Lease quota fishing in a changing rock lobster industry. Marine Policy 34, 859–867.
Lease quota fishing in a changing rock lobster industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Generalized linear models. In ‘Modern applied statistics with S’. (Springer New York: New York, NY, USA)

Yandle, T, and Dewees, CM (2008). Consolidation in an individual transferable quota regime: lessons from New Zealand, 1986–1999. Environmental Management 41, 915–928.
Consolidation in an individual transferable quota regime: lessons from New Zealand, 1986–1999.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18324343PubMed |