Bearing all Down Under: the role of Australasian countries in the illegal bear trade
Phillip Cassey A * , Lalita Gomez B , Sarah Heinrich A B , Pablo García-Díaz C , Sarah Stoner D and Chris R. Shepherd BA Invasion Science & Wildlife Ecology Lab, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
B Monitor Conservation Research Society (Monitor), Big Lake Ranch, BC V0L 1G0, Canada.
C School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, UK.
D Wildlife Justice Commission, Johan de Wittlaan 7, The Hague 2517 JR, The Netherlands.
Pacific Conservation Biology 28(6) 472-480 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21057
Submitted: 27 August 2021 Accepted: 5 October 2021 Published: 4 November 2021
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: Illegal wildlife trade (IWT) is a leading concern for conservation and biosecurity agencies globally, and involves multiple source, transit, and destination countries smuggling species on a transnational scale. The contribution of non-range countries for driving demand in IWT is often overlooked.
Aims: We analysed the dynamics (source, type and quantity) of bear seizures in Australia and New Zealand to gain a deeper understanding of the IWT, and to raise awareness among enforcement agencies for mitigating the international smuggling of bear parts and derivatives, and reducing the global threat to bears from illegal exploitation.
Methods: We collated biosecurity and conservation enforcement agency records of CITES seizures from Australia and New Zealand. All of the seizures were declared for ‘personal use’.
Key results: We report on 781 seizures of bear parts and derivatives in Australia and New Zealand from 33 countries over the past decade. The majority of seizures were medicinal (gall bladder and bile) products, but also included a range of body parts, hunting trophies and meat. China was the source of the greatest number of seizures, however, 32 additional source and transit countries/territories (from Asia, Europe, Americas, Middle East and Africa) were also involved in the seizures of bear parts and their derivatives.
Conclusions: The widespread trade of bears is an example of the far-reaching consequences commercial use can have on threatened species. Australia and New Zealand have no native bear species, and yet are frequently involved in wildlife seizures, and illegal bear trade continues to be an enforcement issue.
Implications: IWT has a detrimental impact on the conservation of bears. Conservation research in non-range countries needs to be conducted to determine the demand and threats from IWT, and to increase collaborative strategies to counter transnational smuggling.
Keywords: biosecurity seizures, CITES, Family: Ursidae, smuggling, threatened species, traditional medicine, trophy hunting, wildlife trade.
References
Auliya, M, Altherr, S, Ariano-Sanchez, D, Baard, EH, Brown, C, Brown, RM, Cantu, J-C, Gentile, G, Gildenhuys, P, Henningheim, E, Hintzmann, J, Kanari, K, Krvavac, M, Lettink, M, Lippert, J, Luiselli, L, Nilson, G, Nguyen, TQ, Nijman, V, Parham, JF, Pasachnik, SA, Pedrono, M, Rauhaus, A, Córdova, DR, Sanchez, M-E, Schepp, U, van Schingen, M, Schneeweiss, N, Segniagbeto, GH, and Somaweera, R (2016). Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market. Biological Conservation 204, 103–119.| Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berec, M, Vršecká, L, and Šetlíková, I (2018). What is the reality of wildlife trade volume? CITES trade database limitations. Biological Conservation 224, 111–116.
| What is the reality of wildlife trade volume? CITES trade database limitations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Braden, K (2014). Illegal recreational hunting in Russia: the role of social norms and elite violators. Eurasian Geography and Economics 55, 457–490.
| Illegal recreational hunting in Russia: the role of social norms and elite violators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brenton-Rule, E, Frankel, S, and Lester, P (2016). Improving management of invasive species: New Zealand’s approach to pre- and post-border pests. Policy Quarterly 12, 17–25.
| Improving management of invasive species: New Zealand’s approach to pre- and post-border pests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burgess EA, Stoner SS, Foley KE (2014) ‘Brought to bear: an analysis of seizures across Asia (2000–2011).’ (TRAFFIC: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia)
Byard, RW (2016). Traditional medicines and species extinction: another side to forensic wildlife investigation. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 12, 125–127.
| Traditional medicines and species extinction: another side to forensic wildlife investigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26798031PubMed |
Clarke, S, Stenekes, N, Kancans, R, Woodland, C, and Robinson, A (2018). Undelivered risk: a counter-factual analysis of the biosecurity risk avoided by inspecting international mail articles. NeoBiota 40, 73–86.
| Undelivered risk: a counter-factual analysis of the biosecurity risk avoided by inspecting international mail articles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crudge, B, Nguyen, T, and Cao, T (2020). The challenges and conservation implications of bear bile farming in Viet Nam. Oryx 54, 252–259.
| The challenges and conservation implications of bear bile farming in Viet Nam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
D’Cruze, N, Sarma, UK, Mookerjee, A, Singh, B, Louis, J, Mahapatra, RP, Jaiswal, VP, Roy, TK, Kumari, I, and Menon, V (2011). Dancing bears in India: a sloth bear status report. Ursus 22, 99–105.
| Dancing bears in India: a sloth bear status report.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Feng, Y, Siu, K, Wang, N, Ng, KM, Tsao, SW, Nagamatsu, T, and Tong, Y (2009). Bear bile: dilemma of traditional medicinal use and animal protection. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5, 2.
| Bear bile: dilemma of traditional medicinal use and animal protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19138420PubMed |
Fobar R (2020) China promotes bear bile as coronavirus treatment, alarming wildlife advocates. National Geographic Magazine, 26th March 2020. Available at https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/chinese-government-promotes-bear-bile-as-coronavirus-covid19-treatment [Accessed 23 August 2021].
Foley KE, Stengel CJ, Shepherd CR (2011) ‘Pills, powders, vials and flakes: the bear bile trade in Asia’. (TRAFFIC Southeast Asia: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia)
Gaius J (2018) Grizzly trophies in Europe: Are B.C. grizzly bear parts being unlawfully imported into the EU? (David Suzuki Foundation). Available at https://davidsuzuki.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Grizzly-Trophies-in-Europe-DSF-report-July2018-final.pdf [Accessed 23 August 2021]
Garshelis D, Steinmetz R (2020) Ursus thibetanus (amended version of 2016 assessment) (The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T22824A166528664). Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T22824A166528664.en [Accessed 7 June 2021]
Gomez, L, and Shepherd, CR (2019). Bearly on the radar – an analysis of seizures of bears in Indonesia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 65, 89.
| Bearly on the radar – an analysis of seizures of bears in Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gomez, L, Shepherd, CR, and Khoo, MS (2020). Illegal trade of sun bear parts in the Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak. Endangered Species Research 41, 279–287.
| Illegal trade of sun bear parts in the Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gore, ML, Braszak, P, Brown, J, Cassey, P, Duffy, R, Fisher, J, Graham, J, Justo-Hanani, R, Kirkwood, AE, Lunstrum, E, Machalaba, C, Massé, F, Manguiat, M, Omrow, D, Stoett, P, Wyatt, T, and White, R (2019). Transnational environmental crime threatens sustainable development. Nature Sustainability 2, 784–786.
| Transnational environmental crime threatens sustainable development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hinsley, A, Milner-Gulland, EJ, Cooney, R, Timoshyna, A, Ruan, X, and Lee, T M (2020). Building sustainability into the belt and road initiative’s traditional Chinese medicine trade. Nature Sustainability 3, 96–100.
| Building sustainability into the belt and road initiative’s traditional Chinese medicine trade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IFAW (2016) Killing for trophies: an analysis of global hunting trade. Available at https://d1jyxxz9imt9yb.cloudfront.net/resource/36/attachment/regular/Killing_For_Trophies.pdf [Accessed 23 August 2021]
Kemf E, Wilson A, Servheen C (1999) ‘Wanted alive!: bears in the wild.’ (World Wide Fund for Nature: Gland, Switzerland)
Lane, SE, Cannon, RM, Arthur, AD, and Robinson, AP (2019). Sample size for inspection intended to manage risk within mixed consignments. NeoBiota 42, 59–69.
| Sample size for inspection intended to manage risk within mixed consignments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, D, and Scheele, B (2017). Do not publish. Science 356, 800–801.
| Do not publish.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28546170PubMed |
Livingstone, E, Gomez, L, and Bouhuys, J (2018). A review of bear farming and bear trade in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Global Ecology and Conservation 13, e00380.
| A review of bear farming and bear trade in Lao People’s Democratic Republic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer D, Zeileis A, Hornik K (2020) vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. R package version 1.4-8. Available at https://rdrr.io/cran/vcd/
Mills, J, and Servheen, C (1994). The Asian trade in bears and bear parts: impacts and conservation recommendations. Bears: Their Biology and Management 9, 161–167.
| The Asian trade in bears and bear parts: impacts and conservation recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nijman, V, Oo, H, and Shwe, NM (2017). Assessing the illegal bear trade in Myanmar through conversations with poachers: topology, perceptions and trade links to China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 22, 172–182.
| Assessing the illegal bear trade in Myanmar through conversations with poachers: topology, perceptions and trade links to China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peppin, L, McEwing, R, Carvalho, GR, and Ogden, R (2008). A DNA-based approach for the forensic identification of asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in a traditional Asian medicine. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53, 1358–1362.
| A DNA-based approach for the forensic identification of asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in a traditional Asian medicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18752556PubMed |
Phelps, J, Biggs, D, and Webb, EL (2016). Tools and terms for understanding illegal wildlife trade. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 479–489.
| Tools and terms for understanding illegal wildlife trade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rosen, GE, and Smith, KF (2010). Summarizing the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife. EcoHealth 7, 24–32.
| Summarizing the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20524140PubMed |
Scheffers, BR, Oliveira, BF, Lamb, I, and Edwards, DP (2019). Global wildlife trade across the tree of life. Science 366, 71–76.
| Global wildlife trade across the tree of life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31604304PubMed |
Scotson, L (2012). Status of Asiatic Black Bears and Sun Bears in Xe Pian National Protected Area, Lao PDR. International Bear News 21, .
Scotson L, Fredriksson G, Augeri D, Cheah C, Ngoprasert D, Wai-Ming W (2017) Helarctos malayanus (errata version published in 2018). (The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T9760A123798233). Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T9760A45033547.en [Accessed 7 June 2021]
Shepherd, CR, and Nijman, V (2007). The trade in bear parts from Myanmar: an illustration of the ineffectiveness of enforcement of international wildlife trade regulations. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 35–42.
| The trade in bear parts from Myanmar: an illustration of the ineffectiveness of enforcement of international wildlife trade regulations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shepherd, CR, Kufnerová, J, Cajthaml, T, Frouzová, J, and Gomez, L (2020). Bear trade in the Czech Republic: an analysis of legal and illegal international trade from 2005 to 2020. European Journal of Wildlife Research 66, 92.
| Bear trade in the Czech Republic: an analysis of legal and illegal international trade from 2005 to 2020.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Su P (2002) Bear markets: Australia. In ‘The bear bile business – the global trade in bear products from China to Asia and beyond’. (Eds T Phillips, P Wilson) pp. 229–238. (World Society for the Protection of Animals: London, UK)
van Uhm D P (2016) ‘The illegal wildlife trade: inside the world of poachers, smugglers and traders.’ (Springer: Switzerland)
World Animal Protection (2020) ‘Cruel cures: the industry behind bear bile production and how to end it.’ (World Animal Protection: Canada)
Willcox D, Nguyen MDT, Gomez L (2016) ‘An assessment of trade in bear bile and gall bladder in Viet Nam.’ (TRAFFIC: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia)
Williams C (2020) Woman fined $7500 for smuggling bear bile into New Zealand. Available at https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/120007097/woman-fined-7500-for-smuggling-bear-bile-into-new-zealand [Accessed 4 March 2020]
Zeileis, A, Meyer, D, and Hornik, K (2007). Residual-based shadings for visualizing (conditional) independence. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16, 507–525.
| Residual-based shadings for visualizing (conditional) independence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |