Deriving a population estimate for Eld’s deer (Rucervus eldii siamensis) in Siem Pang Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia
Paul Meek

A
B
C
D
Abstract
Eld’s deer (Rucervus eldii) was once widely distributed across Southeast Asia but is now endangered. The strong hold of the subspecies R. e. siamensis is largely restricted to north and east Cambodia, with only small, spatially isolated populations known to occur.
To assess if camera traps and spatial capture–recapture methodology can estimate population size of Eld’s deer in Siem Pang Wildlife Sanctuary (SMWS).
Infra-red and white flash camera traps were set at 83 grid-point locations (83 km2) over a 5-month sampling period and used a Spatially Explicit Capture Recapture (SECR) model to estimate population size, relying on natural markings to identify males and using sex ratios to extrapolate a population estimate.
We estimated the number of Eld’s deer in SMWS to be 272 (95% CI: 169–435). We affirmed that white flash camera traps are advantageous in identifying individuals without significantly affecting detection probability.
Monitoring the small and difficult to detect subpopulations of R. e. siamensis is challenging. Camera traps can be used although there are challenges to resolve when using the SECR model that can be improved by using white flash cameras to improve the identification of individuals, and assisted with sex and age determination.
The SPWS population may potentially be the largest of the R. e. siamensis subspecies in Southeast Asia and it is therefore of critical conservation importance that long term camera trap monitoring is established.
Keywords: camera trapping, conservation practice, monitoring, population estimation, SECR, sub-species, threatened species, white flash.
References
Apps P, McNutt JW (2018) Are camera traps fit for purpose? A rigorous, reproducible and realistic test of camera trap performance. African Journal of Ecology 56(4), 710-720.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Augustine BC, Royle JA, Kelly MJ, Satter CB, Alonso RS, Boydston EE, Crooks KR (2018) Spatial capture-recapture with partial identity: an application to camera traps. Annals of Applied Statistics 12(1), 67-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Aung M, McShea WJ, Htung S, Than A, Soe TM, Monfort S, Wemmer C (2001) Ecology and social organization of a tropical deer (Cervus eldi thamin). Journal of Mammalogy 82, 836-847.
| Google Scholar |
Borchers D (2012) A non-technical overview of spatially explicit capture–recapture models. Journal of Ornithology 152, 435-444.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics 64(2), 377-385.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(30), E6089-E6096.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chandler RB, Royle JA (2013) Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations. The Annals of Applied Statistics 7(2), 936-954.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Despres-Einspenner ML, Howe EJ, Drapeau P, Kühl HS (2017) An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density. American Journal of Primatology 79(7), e22647.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Efford M (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106(3), 598-610.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Efford MG, Boulanger J (2019) Fast evaluation of study designs for spatially explicit capture–recapture. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 1529-1535.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Efford MG, Hunter CM (2018) Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density. Biometrics 74(2), 411-420.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gray TNE, Brook SM, McShea WJ, Mahood S, Ranjitsingh MK, Miyunt A, Hussain SA, Timmins R (2015) Rucervus eldii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015, e.T4265A22166803.
| Google Scholar |
Johansson Ö, Samelius G, Wikberg E, Chapron G, Mishra C, Low M (2020) Identification errors in camera-trap studies result in systematic population overestimation. Scientific Reports 10(1), 6393.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79(8), 2852-2862.
| Google Scholar |
Kelly MJ, Noss AJ, Di Bitetti MS, Maffei L, Arispe RL, Paviolo A, De Angelo CD, Di Blanco YE (2008) Estimating puma densities from camera trapping across three study sites: bolivia, argentina, and belize. Journal of Mammalogy 89(2), 408-418.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Khotpathoom T, Vu TT (2021) An estimation of density and population size for Eld’s deer in the Xonnabouly Eld’s deer sanctuary, Lao PDR. Mammalia 85(2), 109-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kowalski M (2013) ExifPro 2.1. Available at www.exifpro.com/index.html [accessed 202-22].
Ladd R, Crouthers R, Brook S, Eames JC (2022) Reviewing the status and demise of the Endangered Eld’s deer and identifying priority sites and conservation actions in Cambodia. Mammalia 86(5), 407-421.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ladd R, Meek P, Leung LK-P (2023) The influence of camera-trap flash type on the behavioural response, detection rate and individual recognition of Eld’s deer. Wildlife Research 50, 475-483.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lande R (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. The American Naturalist 142(6), 911-927.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Legrand R, Ladd R, Samnang E, Meek PD, Eames J (2024) Use of trapeangs by Eld’s deer Rucervus eldii siamensis in Siem Pang Wildlife Sacntuary, Cambodia. Cambodian Journal of Natural History 2, 101-111.
| Google Scholar |
Loveridge R, Cusack JJ, Eames JC, Eang S, Willcox D (2018) Mammal records and conservation threats in Siem Pang Wildlife Sanctuary and Siem Pang Khang Lech Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia. Cambodian Journal of Natural History 2, 76-89.
| Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS (2015a) The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37(1), 13-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Vernes K, Fleming PJS (2015b) The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37(1), 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Ballard GA, Falzon G (2016) The higher you go the less you will know: placing camera traps high to avoid theft will affect detection. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2(4), 204-211.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Collingridge L, Smith D, Ballard G (2024) A calibration method for optimizing detection of species using camera traps. JOJ Wildlife & Biodiversity 5(2), 555655.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(12), 668-673.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62, 3-135.
| Google Scholar |
O’Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biological Conservation 133(1), 42-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Shaffer ML (1981) Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience 31(2), 131-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sollmann R, Gardner B, Parsons AW, Stocking JJ, McClintock BT, Simons TR, Pollock KH, O’Connell AF (2013b) A spatial mark–resight model augmented with telemetry data. Ecology 94(3), 553-559.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sun CC, Fuller AK, Royle JA (2015) Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0141634.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thu AM, Li G-G, Zhang MX, Thang TH, Soe AM, Naing W, Quan R-C (2019) Group size and social organization of the endangered Eld’s deer (Rucervus eldii thamin): results from a long-term study in Myanmar. Global Ecology and Conservation 18, e00618.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Weckel M, Rockwell RF, Secret F (2011) A modification of Jacobson et al.’s (1997) individual branch-antlered male method for censusing white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35(4), 445-451.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |