Developing an impact index for the Australian Fire Danger Rating System: predicting potential structure loss from wildfires
Dan Krix
A
B
C
D
Abstract
Accurately predicting impacts of wildfires remains a top priority for fire and land management agencies. The Australian Fire Danger Rating System (AFDRS) redesigned forecasts of fire danger for Australian fire agencies, modernising the fire danger system. The next phase of the AFDRS focuses on developing indices for Fire Ignition, Suppression and Impact (FISI).
Impact models were developed to predict structure loss at the bushland–urban interface in eastern Australia.
Structure counts, cleared land and canopy height, calculated at radii 50–1000 m from structures, as well as terrain ruggedness, were used to model individual structure loss during wildfire and proportional loss in built-up areas.
The individual and proportional structure loss models accurately predicted structure loss (individual losses: true positive rate (TPR) = 0.67, true negative rate (TNR) = 0.69; proportional loss r2 = 0.71). Loss was lowest where structures had defensible space on flat ground, with higher numbers of structures nearby and shorter vegetation canopy height.
The models determine the probability of structure loss during destructive wildfire.
These models provide fire agencies information on the likelihood of structure loss and aid in decision-making. The impact index may support effective resource allocation, potentially reducing structure loss.
Keywords: AFDRS, fire danger rating, forecast, impact, model, probability, structure loss, wildfire.
References
Ager AA, Day MA, Alcasena FJ, Evers CR, Short KC, Grenfell I (2021) Predicting Paradise: modeling future wildfire disasters in the western US. Science of The Total Environment 784, 147057.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Blanchi RM, Leonard JE, Leicester RH (2006) Bushfire Risk at the Rural/Urban Interface. In ‘Australasian Bushfire Conference’. pp. 6–9. Available at https://www.fireandbiodiversity.org.au/images/publications/conference-2006/Bushfire_risk_at_the_rural-urban_interface.pdf
Blanchi R, Lucas C, Leonard J, Finkele K (2010) Meteorological conditions and wildfire-related house loss in Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 914-926.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Blanchi R, Leonard J, Haynes K, Opie K, James M, de Oliveira FD (2014) Environmental circumstances surrounding bushfire fatalities in Australia 1901–2011. Environmental Science & Policy 37, 192-203.
| Google Scholar |
Collins KM, Penman TD, Price OF (2016) Some wildfire ignition causes pose more risk of destroying houses than others. PLoS One 11, e0162083.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Csárdi G, Nepusz T, Traag V, Horvát Sz, Zanini F, Noom D, Müller K (2024) igraph: Network Analysis and Visualization in R. 10.5281/zenodo
Duff TJ, Penman TD (2021) Determining the likelihood of asset destruction during wildfires: modelling house destruction with fire simulator outputs and local-scale landscape properties. Safety Science 139, 105196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gibbons P, Van Bommel L, Gill AM, Cary GJ, Driscoll DA, Bradstock RA, Knight E, Moritz MA, Stephens SL, Lindenmayer DB (2012) Land management practices associated with house loss in wildfires. PLoS One 7, e29212.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gibbons P, Gill AM, Shore N, Moritz MA, Dovers S, Cary GJ (2018) Options for reducing house-losses during wildfires without clearing trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning 174, 10-17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gombin J, Vaidyanathan R, Agafonkin V (2020) concaveman: A Very Fast 2D Concave Hull Algorithm (R package version 1.1.0). Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=concaveman
Harris S, Anderson W, Kilinc M, Fogarty L (2012) The relationship between fire behaviour measures and community loss: an exploratory analysis for developing a bushfire severity scale. Natural Hazards 63, 391-415.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Haynes K, Handmer J, Mcaneney J, Tibbits A, Coates L (2010) Australian bushfire fatalities 1900–2008: exploring trends in relation to the ‘Prepare, stay and defend or leave early’ policy. Environmental Science & Policy 13, 185-194.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hollis JJ, Matthews S, Fox-Hughes P, Grootemaat S, Heemstra S, Kenny BJ, Sauvage S (2024) Introduction to the Australian Fire Danger Rating System. International Journal of Wildland Fire 33, WF23140.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hijmans R (2024) terra: Spatial Data Analysis. R package version 1.7-71. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra
Kenny BJ, Matthews S, Sauvage S, Grootemaat S, Hollis JJ, Fox-Hughes P (2024) Australian Fire Danger Rating System: implementing fire behaviour calculations to forecast fire danger in a research prototype. International Journal of Wildland Fire 33(4), WF23142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Leonard J, Blanchi R (2005) Investigation of bushfire attack mechanisms involved in house loss in the ACT Bushfire 2003. Bushfire CRC report. Available at https://www.naturalhazards.com.au/crc-collection/downloads/act_bushfire_crc_report.pdf
Massada AB, Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Hawbaker TJ (2009) Wildfire risk in the wildland–urban interface: a simulation study in northwestern Wisconsin. Forest Ecology and Management 258(9), 1990-1999.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nolan RH, Anderson LO, Poulter B, Varner JM (2022) Increasing threat of wildfires: the year 2020 in perspective: A Global Ecology and Biogeography special issue. Global Ecology and Biogeography 31, 1898-1905.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Peace M, McCaw L (2024) Future fire events are likely to be worse than climate projections indicate – these are some of the reasons why. International Journal of Wildland Fire 33(7),.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pebesma E (2018) Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal 10(1), 439-446.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Penman TD, Bradstock RA, Price O (2013) Modelling the determinants of ignition in the Sydney Basin, Australia: implications for future management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 469-478.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Penman SH, Price OF, Penman TD, Bradstock RA (2019) The role of defensible space on the likelihood of house impact from wildfires in forested landscapes of southeastern Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 28, 4-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Price O, Bradstock R (2013) Landscape scale influences of forest area and housing density on house loss in the 2009 Victorian bushfires. PLoS One 8, e73421.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Price OF, Whittaker J, Gibbons P, Bradstock R (2021) Comprehensive Examination of the determinants of damage to houses in two wildfires in eastern Australia in 2013. Fire 4(3), 44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ramsay GC, Mcarthur NA, Dowling VP (1987) Preliminary results from an examination of house survival in the 16 February 1983 bushfires in Australia. Fire and Materials 11, 49-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Raveendran N, Zhu H, Li H, Sofronov G (2024) Wildfire loss modeling: a flexible semiparametric approach. North American Actuarial Journal 29, 329-344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2023) ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.R-project.org/
Scarth P, Armston J, Lucas R, Bunting P (2019) A structural classification of Australian vegetation using ICESat/GLAS, ALOS PALSAR, and Landsat sensor data. Remote Sensing 11(2), 147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Scarth P, Armston J, Lucas R, Bunting P (2023) Vegetation Height and Structure - Derived from ALOS-1 PALSAR, Landsat and ICESat/GLAS, Australia Coverage. (Version 1.0) [Dataset] Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Available at https://portal.tern.org.au/metadata/TERN/de1c2fef-b129-485e-9042-8b22ee616e66
Schwarz GE (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6(2), 461-464.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Strahan K (2020) An archetypal perspective on householders who ‘wait and see’ during a bushfire. Progress in Disaster Science 7, 100-107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Massada AB, Brennan TJ, Radeloff VC (2012) Housing arrangement and location determine the likelihood of housing loss due to wildfire. PLoS One 7(3), e33954.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Syphard AD, Brennan TJ, Keeley JE (2014) The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 1165-1175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tedim F, Leone V, Amraoui M, Bouillon C, Coughlan MR, Delogu GM, Fernandes PM, Ferreira C, McCaffrey S, McGee TK (2018) Defining extreme wildfire events: difficulties, challenges, and impacts. Fire 1, 9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tolhurst KG, Shields B, Chong DM (2008) Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 47-54.
| Google Scholar |
Whittaker J, Clark A (2021) Research to improve community warnings for bushfire. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 36, 13-14.
| Google Scholar |
Whittaker J, Taylor M, Bearman C (2020) Why don’t bushfire warnings work as intended? Responses to official warnings during bushfires in New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 45, 101476.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wilson AA, Ferguson IS (1986) Predicting the probability of house survival during bushfires. Journal of Environmental Management 23, 259-70.
| Google Scholar |
Wilson MFJ, O’Connell B, Brown C, Guinan JC, Grehan AJ (2007) Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Marine Geodesy 30(1–2), 3-35.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wood SN (2004) Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 673-686.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |