Applications of chemical bird repellents for crop and resource protection: a review and synthesis

Shelagh T. DeLiberto; Scott J. Werner

doi:10.1071/WR23062

REVIEW (Open Access)

Previous Contents Vol 51(2)

Applications of chemical bird repellents for crop and resource protection: a review and synthesis

Shelagh T. DeLiberto ^A and Scott J. Werner

^A ^*

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.

^* Correspondence to: Scott.J.Werner@usda.gov

Handling Editor: Peter Brown

Wildlife Research 51, WR23062 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR23062

Submitted: 3 June 2023 Accepted: 22 January 2024 Published: 16 February 2024

Abstract

Non-lethal repellents are needed to protect newly planted and ripening crops, to prevent valuable resources from being damaged by some wild birds worldwide. We systematically searched all scientific publications, patents and product registrations to develop a current review and synthesis regarding chemical bird repellents for wildlife researchers, ecologists, managers and conservationists. We then developed a database regarding the testing procedures and repellency results associated with the published and unpublished literature. For this comprehensive database, we developed an ‘index of success’, or relative efficacy level (e.g. effective in most experiments), associated with each tested bird repellent. We found 345 papers published in 1948–2022, including 2994 tests of 1478 repellent chemicals. From 224 publications regarding seed repellents, chemicals that were effective in most experiments and tested in three or more experiments include fungicides (cycloheximide, thiuram), insecticides (carbamates, imidacloprid), starlicide (3-chloro-p-toluidine hydrochloride), human pharmaceuticals (aminopyridine, quinine sulfate), petroleum distillate (paranapthalene), alkaloids (caffeine, quinine sulfate), monoterpenes (d-pulegone) and naturally occurring or synthetic polyphenolic compounds (anthraquinone). Among 114 publications regarding repellents used for foliar/fruit applications, chemicals that were effective in most experiments include activated charcoal, anthraquinone and carbamate. Among other bird repellents that were reportedly effective in most experiments, chemicals used for water applications and tested in three or more experiments include benzaldehyde, ortho-aminoacetophenone and sodium chloride; chemicals used as bait repellents include anthraquinone, methyl anthranilate and 2-carbamoyloxyethyl(trimethyl)azanium chloride; and the single chemical regarded as an area repellent was methyl anthranilate. There are currently 17 registered bird repellent products in the USA for five active ingredients, including anthraquinone, capsaicin, methiocarb, methyl anthranilate and polybutene. Future research and development of chemical bird repellents should include biopesticides (i.e. pesticides derived from natural materials) and pesticides that are already registered for human food use. The future discovery of repellent active ingredients and repellent products can be facilitated by an understanding of the scientific literature, patents and product registrations regarding bird repellent applications summarised in this review.

Keywords: agricultural pests, bird repellent, crop protection, management strategies, pest management, repellent chemical, resource protection, wildlife management.

References

Abbott HG (1958) Application of avian repellents to Eastern white pine seed. The Journal of Wildlife Management 22, 304-306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Avery ML, Cummings JL (2003) Chemical repellents for reducing crop damage by blackbirds. In ‘Management of North American Blackbirds’. (Ed. GM Linz) pp. 41–48. (National Wildlife Research Center: Fort Collins, Colorado)

Avery ML, Matteson RE, Nelms CO (1988) Repellency of methyl anthranilate and dimethyl anthranilate to caged red-winged blackbirds and European starlings. Bird Section Research Report 418. p. 14. Denver Wildlife Research Center, Denver, Colorado USA.

Avery ML, Decker DG, Nelms CO (1992) Use of a trigeminal irritant for wildlife management.. In ‘Chemical signals in vertebrates VI’. (Eds RL Doty, D Muller-Schwarze) pp. 319–322 (Plenum Press: New York)

Avery ML, Cummings JL, Decker DG, Johnson JW, Wise JC, Howard JI (1993) Field and aviary evaluation of low-level application rates of methiocarb for reducing bird damage to blueberries. Crop Protection 12, 95-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Avery ML, Decker DG, Humphrey JS, Aronov E, Linscombe SD, Way MO (1995) Methyl anthranilate as a rice seed treatment to deter birds. Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 50-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Avery ML, Fischer DL, Primus TM (1997) Assessing the hazard to granivorous birds feeding on chemically treated seeds. Pesticide Science 49, 362-366.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Avery ML, Werner SJ, Cummings JL, Humphrey JS, Milleson MP, Carlson JC, Primus TM, Goodall MJ (2005) Caffeine for reducing bird damage to newly seeded rice. Crop Protection 24, 651-657.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Belant JL, Gabrey SW, Dolbeer RA, Seamans TW (1995) Methyl anthranilate formulations repel gulls and mallards from water. Crop Protection 14, 171-175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Belant JL, Ickes SK, Tyson LA, Seamans TW (1997) Comparison of four particulate substances as wildlife feeding repellents. Crop Protection 16, 439-447.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Besser JF (1978) Improvements in the use of 4-aminopyridine for protecting agricultural crops from birds. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 8, 51-53.
| Google Scholar |

Bruggers RL (1979) Summary of methiocarb trials against pest birds in Senegal. Proceedings of the Bird Control Seminar 8, 172-184.
| Google Scholar |

Bruggers RL, Sultana P, Brooks JE, Fiedler LA, Rimpel M, Manikowski S, Shivanarayan N, Santhaiah N, Okuno I (1984) Preliminary investigations of the effectiveness of trimethacarb as a bird repellent in developing countries. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 11, 192-203.
| Google Scholar |

Bullard RW, Schafer EW, Bruggers RL (1983) ‘Tests of the enhancement of avian repellent chemicals with sensory cues.’ (American Society for Testing and Materials)

Clapperton BK, Morgan DKJ, Day TD, Oates KE, Beath AM, Cox NR, Matthews LR (2014) Efficacy of bird repellents at deterring North Island robins (Petroica australis longipes) and tomtits (P. macrocephala toitoi) from baits. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 38, 116-123.
| Google Scholar |

Clark L (1995) A review of the bird repellent effects of 117 carbocyclic compounds. In ‘Repellents in wildlife management’. (Ed. JR Mason) pp. 343–352. (USDA National Wildlife Research Center: Fort Collins, CO)

Clark L (1998) Review of bird repellents. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 18, 330-337.
| Google Scholar |

Clark L, Belant JL (1998) Contribution of particulates and pH on cowbirds’ (Molothrus ater) avoidance of grain treated with agricultural lime. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57, 133-144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Clark L, Shah PS, Mason JR (1991) Chemical repellency in birds: relationship between chemical structure and avoidance response. Journal of Experimental Zoology 260, 310-322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cowan P, Crowell M (2017) Visual and taste cues for minimising native bird interactions with toxic 1080 baits – a review of current practices. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 41, 178-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Crabb AC (1979) A report on efficacy of methiocarb as an avian repellent in figs and results of industry-wide bird damage assessments. Proceedings of the Bird Control Seminar 8, 25-30.
| Google Scholar |

Crocker DR, Reid K (1993) Repellency of cinnamic acid derivatives to rooks and chaffinches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21, 456-460.
| Google Scholar |

Cummings JL, Otis DL, Davis JE, Jr (1992) Dimethyl and methyl anthranilate and methiocarb deter feeding in captive Canada geese and Mallards. The Journal of Wildlife Management 56, 349-355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cummings JL, Mason JR, Otis DL, Davis JEJ (1994) Evaluation of methiocarb, ziram, and methyl anthranilate as bird repellents applied to dendrobium orchids. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22, 633-638.
| Google Scholar |

Cummings JL, Avery ML, Pochop PA, Davis JE, Jr, Decker DG, Krupa HW, Johnson JW (1995) Evaluation of a methyl anthranilate formulation for reducing bird damage to blueberries. Crop Protection 14, 257-259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cummings JL, Pochop PA, Yoder CA, Davis JJ (1998) Potential bird repellents to reduce bird damage to lettuce seed and seedlings. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 18, 350-353.
| Google Scholar |

Curtis PD, Merwin IA, Pritts MP, Peterson DV (1994) Chemical repellents and plastic netting for reducing bird damage to sweet cherries, blueberries, and grapes. HortScience 29, 1151-1155.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Daneke D, Decker DG (1988) Prolonged seed handling time deters red-winged blackbirds feeding on rice seed. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 13, 287-292.
| Google Scholar |

Day TD, Matthews LR, Waas JR (2003) Repellents to deter New Zealand’s North Island robin Petroica australis longipes from pest control baits. Biological Conservation 114, 309-316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

De Grazio JW, Besser JF, DeCino TJ, Guarino JL, Starr RI (1971) Use of 4-Aminopyridine to protect ripening corn from blackbirds. The Journal of Wildlife Management 35, 565-569.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DeLiberto ST, Werner SJ (2016) Review of anthraquinone applications for pest management and agricultural crop protection. Pest Management Science 72, 1813-1825.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Dolbeer RA, Ickes SK (1994) Red-winged blackbird feeding preferences and response to wild rice treated with portland cement or plaster. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 16, 279-282.
| Google Scholar |

Dolbeer RA, Clark L, Woronecki PP, Seamans TW (1991) Pen tests of methyl anthranilate as a bird repellent in water. Proceedings of the Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference 5, 112-116.
| Google Scholar |

Dolbeer RA, Belant JL, Clark L (1993) Methyl anthranilate formulations to repel birds from water at airports and food at landfills. Proceedings of the Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop 11, 42-52.
| Google Scholar |

Dorr B, Clark L, Glahn JE, Mezine I (1998) Evaluation of a methyl anthranilate-based bird repellent: toxicity to channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus and effect on great blue heron Ardea herodias feeding behavior. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 29, 451-462.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Duncan CJ (1963) The response of the feral pigeon when offered the active ingredients of commercial repellents in solution. Annals of Applied Biology 51, 127-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Frank VH, Dischner MvU (1970) The testing of repellents intended to prevent consumption of seed grain by pheasants. Z.Jagdwiss 16, 14-22.
| Google Scholar |

Gadd P (1992) Avitrol use in the protection of wine grapes from the house finch (linnet) in Sonoma County. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 15, 89-92.
| Google Scholar |

Goodhue LD, Baumgartner FM (1965) Applications of new bird control chemicals. The Journal of Wildlife Management 29, 830-837.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Goodman J, Chandna A, Roe K (2015) Trends in animal use at US research facilities. Journal of Medical Ethics 41, 567-569.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Guarino JL (1972) Methiocarb, a chemical bird repellent: a review of its effectiveness on crops. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 5, 108-111.
| Google Scholar |

Guarino JL, Shake WF, Schafer EW, Jr (1974) Reducing bird damage to ripening cherries with methiocarb. The Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 338-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hamsa M, Ali B, El Haig I, Bohl W, Besser JF, De Grazio JW, Bruggers RL (1982) Evalutating the repellency of methiocarb. Malimbus 4, 33-41.
| Google Scholar |

Joyner DE, Somers JD, Gilbert FF, Brooks RJ (1980) Use of methiocarb as a blackbird repellent in field corn. The Journal of Wildlife Management 44, 672-676.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kaiser BA, Johnson BL, Ostlie MH, Werner SJ, Klug PE (2021) Inefficiency of anthraquinone-based avian repellents when applied to sunflower: the importance of crop vegetative and floral characteristics in field applications. Pest Management Science 77, 1502-1511.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kelly ST, Dolbeer RA (1984) Decline in use of avitrol R to reduce blackbird damage to field corn. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12, 252-255.
| Google Scholar |

Kennedy TF, Connery J (2008) An investigation of seed treatments for the control of crow damage to newly-sown wheat. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 47, 79-91.
| Google Scholar |

Lopez-Antia A, Ortiz-Santaliestra ME, Mateo R (2014) Experimental approaches to test pesticide-treated seed avoidance by birds under a simulated diversification of food sources. Science of The Total Environment 496, 179-187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Mann WFJ, Derr HJ, Meanley B (1956) Bird repellents for direct seeding longleaf pine. Forests and People 6, 16-17 48.
| Google Scholar |

Mason JR, Avery ML, Glahn JF, Otis DL, Matteson RE, Nelms CO (1991) Evaluation of methyl anthranilate and starch-plated dimethyl anthranilate as bird repellent feed additives. The Journal of Wildlife Management 55, 182-187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mason JR, Clark L, Miller TP (1993) Evaluation of a pelleted bait containing methyl anthranilate as a bird repellent. Pesticide Science 39, 299-304.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mastrota FN, Mench JA (1995) Evaluation of taste repellents with northern bobwhites for deterring ingestion of granular pesticides. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14, 631-638.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mott DF, Besser JF, West RR, De Grazio JW (1972) Bird damage to peanuts and methods for alleviating the problem. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 5, 118-120.
| Google Scholar |

Neff JA, Meanley B (1957) Bird repellent studies in the eastern Arkansas rice fields. Progress Report 2. Denver Wildlife Research Laboratory, Denver, Colorado USA.

Neumeyer J, Gibbons D, Trask H (1969) Pesticides I. Chemical Week April 12, pp. 39–68.

Nichols M, Bell P, Mulgan N, Taylor A (2020) Conditioned aversion in kea to cereal bait: a captive study using anthraquinone. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 230, 105077.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Oerke E-C (2006) Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science 144, 31-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Orr-Walker T, Adams NJ, Roberts LG, Kemp JR, Spurr EB (2012) Effectiveness of the bird repellents anthraquinone and d-pulegone on an endemic New Zealand parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 137, 80-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pelaez V, da Silva LR, Araujo EB (2013) Regulation of pesticides: a comparative analysis. Science and Public Policy 40, 644-656.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Popp J, Pető K, Nagy JG (2013) Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33, 243-255.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Royall WC, Jr, Ferguson ER (1962) Controlling bird and mammal damage in direct seeding loblolly pine in East Texas. Journal of Forestry 60, 37-39 10.1093/jof/60.1.37.
| Google Scholar |

Sandhu PS, Dhindsa MS, Toor HS (1987) Evaluation of methiocarb and thiram as seed treatments for protecting sprouting maize from birds in Punjab (India). Tropical Pest Management 33, 370-372.
| Google Scholar |

Sayre RW, Clark L (2001) Effect of primary and secondary repellents on European starlings: an initial assessment. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65, 461-469.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schafer EW Jr, Bowles WAJ (2004) Toxicity, repellency or phytotoxicity of 979 chemicals to birds, mammals and plants. National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO.

Schafer EW, Jr, Brunton RB (1971) Chemicals as bird repellents: two promising agents. The Journal of Wildlife Management 35, 569-572.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schafer EW Jr, Brunton RB, Lockyer NF (1977) Learned aversion in wild birds: a method for testing comparative acute repellency. In ‘Test methods for vertebrate pest control and management materials’. (Eds WB Jackson, RE Marsh) pp. 186–194. (American Society for Testing and Materials)

Schafer EW, Jr, Bowles WA, Jr, Hurlbut J (1983) The acute oral toxicity, repellency, and hazard potential of 998 chemicals to one or more species of wild and domestic birds. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 12, 355-382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Schierow L, Esworthy R (2012) Pesticide law: a summary of the statutes; CRS Report RL31921. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.

Snijders L, Thierij NM, Appleby R, St. Clair CC, Tobajas J (2021) Conditioned taste aversion as a tool for mitigating human-wildlife conflicts. Frontiers in Conservation Science 2, 744704.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Spurr EB (1993) Feeding by captive rare birds on baits used in poisoning operations for control of brushtail possums. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 17, 13-18.
| Google Scholar |

Starr RI, Besser JF, Brunton RB (1964) A laboratory method for evaluating chemicals as bird repellents. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 12, 342-344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

St. Aubin F (1977) How much do regulations inhibit pesticide development. Pest Control 45, 16-17 20, 62, 64, 66–68.
| Google Scholar |

Sultana P, Brooks JE, Bruggers RL (1986) Repellency and toxicity of bird control chemicals to pest birds in Bangladesh. Tropical Pest Management 32, 246-248.
| Google Scholar |

Tupper SK, Werner SJ, Carlson JC, Pettit SE, Wise JC, Lindell CA, Linz GM (2014) European starling feeding activity on repellent treated crops and pellets. Crop Protection 63, 76-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wager-Page SA, Mason JR (1996a) Exposure to volatile d-pulegone alters feeding behavior in European starlings. Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 917-922.
| Google Scholar |

Wager-Page SA, Mason JR (1996b) Ortho-aminoacetophenone, a non-lethal repellent: the effect of volatile cues vs. direct contact on avoidance behavior by rodents and birds. Pesticide Science 46, 55-60.
| Google Scholar |

Watkins RW, Gill EL, Bishop JD (1995) Evaluation of cinnamamide as an avian repellent: determination of a dose-response curve. Pesticide Science 44, 335-340.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Watkins RW, Lumley JA, Gill EL, Bishop JD, Langton SD, MacNicoll AD, Price NR, Drew MGB (1999) Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) of cinnamic acid bird repellents. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25, 2825-2845.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Werner SJ, Avery ML (2017) Chemical repellents. In ‘Ecology and management of blackbirds (Icteridae) in North America’. (Eds GM Linz, ML Avery) pp. 135–158. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)

Werner SJ, Cummings JL, Tupper SK, Hurley JC, Stahl RS, Primus TM (2007) Caffeine formulation for avian repellency. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1676-1681.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Werner SJ, Carlson JC, Tupper SK, Santer MM, Linz GM (2009) Threshold concentrations of an anthraquinone-based repellent for Canada geese, red-winged blackbirds, and ring-necked pheasants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 190-196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Werner SJ, Linz GM, Carlson JC, Pettit SE, Tupper SK, Santer MM (2011) Anthraquinone-based bird repellent for sunflower crops. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 129, 162-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Werner SJ, DeLiberto ST, Mangan AM, Pettit SE, Ellis JW, Carlson JC (2015) Anthraquinone-based repellent for horned larks, great-tailed grackles, American crows and the protection of California’s specialty crops. Crop Protection 72, 158-162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Werner SJ, Gottlob M, Dieter CD, Stafford JD (2019) Application strategy for an anthraquinone-based repellent and the protection of soybeans from Canada goose depredation. Human-Wildlife Interactions 13, 308-316.
| Google Scholar |

Woronecki PP, Dolbeer RA, Ingram CR, Stickley AR, Jr (1979) 4-Aminopyridine effectiveness reevaluated for reducing blackbird damage to corn. The Journal of Wildlife Management 43, 184-191.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |