Informing apex predator management: population viability analysis of dingoes under different management scenarios
Emily K. Henderson
A * , Benjamin J. Pitcher B C and Neil R. Jordan A B
A
B
C
Abstract
Along with other large carnivores, dingoes (variously Canis dingo, C. lupus dingo, and C. familiaris) can come into conflict with humans, especially when they are habituated to people and associate them with food. Management actions can range from no response, through removal of target individuals, to indiscriminate culls.
To model a known dingo population where lethal management occurs and to predict how different approaches to lethal management might impact the population over the next 20 years.
We used a software package to model a baseline scenario with no lethal management, and then several current, past or plausible lethal management scenarios for the population, including removing different age-sex classes at various levels and frequencies.
Modelled lethal management decreased the probability of population survival in all scenarios tested, particularly when individuals above the age of 2 years were targeted, and when lethal control was modelled to increase in frequency. Models indicated that targeted lethal management of subadult (age 1–2) males resulted in the highest probability of population persistence, which contrasted most markedly with pack removal through indiscriminate culls.
Modelling identified that targeting problem individuals for lethal control was more sustainable for the population than indiscriminate culls. Research indicates that ‘problem’ animals are often subadult males. Modelling the removal of subadult (age 1–2) males affects the population less than removal of other age-sex classes. This implies that targeted lethal management poses less risk to population persistence than indiscriminate culls, since culling is more likely to remove older animals and females. Modelled increases in the number of animals controlled and the frequency of that control decreases the population’s likelihood of persistence.
Lethal management strategies may have serious impacts on the persistence of carnivore populations, particularly when strategies involve broadscale indiscriminate culls. Adoption of best-practice targeted individual management requires investment in monitoring and identification. While the uptake of individual-focused management is not feasible in many scenarios, more widespread uptake would improve wildlife management outcomes.
Keywords: Canis dingo, carnivore, human–wildlife conflict, lethal control, problem animal profiling, PVA, Vortex, wildlife management.
References
Allen BL, Goullet M, Allen LR, Lisle A, Leung LK-P (2013a) Dingoes at the doorstep: preliminary data on the ecology of dingoes in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 119, 131-135.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Allen BL, Fleming PJS, Allen LR, Engeman RM, Ballard G, Leung LK-P (2013b) As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes. Biological Conservation 159, 158-174.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Allen BL, Higginbottom K, Bracks JH, Davies N, Baxter GS (2015) Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 22(2), 197-215.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alting BF, Pitcher BJ, Rees MW, Ferrer-Paris JR, Jordan NR (2024) Population density and ranging behaviour of a generalist carnivore varies with human population. Ecology and Evolution 14(5), e11404.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Appleby R, Smith B, Bernede L, Jones D (2017) Utilising aversive conditioning to manage the behaviour of K’gari (Fraser Island) dingoes (Canis dingo). Pacific Conservation Biology 23(4), 335-358.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Appleby R, Mackie J, Smith B, Bernede L, Jones D (2018) Human–dingo interactions on Fraser Island: an analysis of serious incident reports. Australian Mammalogy 40(2), 146-156.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Appleby R, Smith BP, Jones D, Conroy G, Behrendorff L (2025) A population viability analysis of K’gari (Fraser Island) wongari (dingoes). Australian Mammalogy 47(1), AM23009.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Behrendorff L, Allen BL (2016) From den to dust: longevity of three dingoes (Canis lupus dingo) on Fraser Island (K’gari). Australian Mammalogy 38(2), 256-260.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brainerd SM, Andrén H, Bangs EE, Bradley EH, Fontaine JA, Hall W, Iliopoulos Y, Jimenez MD, Jozwiak EA, Liberg O, Mack CM, Meier TJ, Niemeyer CC, Pedersen HC, Sand H, Schultz RN, Smith DW, Wabakken P, Wydeven AP (2008) The effects of breeder loss on wolves. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72(1), 89-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Breck SW, Poessel SA, Bonnell MA (2017) Evaluating lethal and nonlethal management options for urban coyotes. Human-Wildlife Interactions 11(2), 133-145.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brook BW, O’Grady JJ, Chapman AP, Burgman MA, Akçakaya HR, Frankham R (2000) Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404(6776), 385-387.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cairns KM, Crowther MS, Nesbitt B, Letnic M (2022) The myth of wild dogs in Australia: are there any out there? Australian Mammalogy 44(1), 67-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cairns KM, Crowther MS, Parker HG, Ostrander EA, Letnic M (2023) Genome-wide variant analyses reveal new patterns of admixture and population structure in Australian dingoes. Molecular Ecology 32, 4133-4150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Catling PC, Corbett LK, Newsome AE (1992) Reproduction in captive and wild dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) in temperate and arid environments of Australia. Wildlife Research 19(2), 195-209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chaudhary V, Oli MK (2020) A critical appraisal of population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 34(1), 26-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Conroy GC, Lamont RW, Bridges L, Stephens D, Wardell-Johnson A, Ogbourne SM (2021) Conservation concerns associated with low genetic diversity for K’gari–Fraser Island dingoes. Scientific Reports 11(1), 9503.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Corbett LK (1988) Social dynamics of a captive dingo pack: population regulation by dominant female infanticide. Ethology 78(3), 177-198.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Coulson T, Mace GM, Hudson E, Possingham H (2001) The use and abuse of population viability analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16(5), 219-221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Dickman AJ (2010) Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation 13(5), 458-466.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dickman CR, Newsome TM, van Eeden LM (2021) The dingo dilemma: a brief history of debate. Australian Zoologist 41(3), 298-321.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Forsyth DM, Ramsey DSL, Woodford LP (2019) Estimating abundances, densities, and interspecific associations in a carnivore community. The Journal of Wildlife Management 83(5), 1090-1102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Glen AS, Dickman CR, Soulé ME, Mackey BG (2007) Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator in Australian ecosystems. Austral Ecology 32(5), 492-501.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Grente O, Bauduin S, Santostasi NL, Chamaillé-Jammes S, Duchamp C, Drouet-Hoguet N, Gimenez O (2024) Evaluating the effects of wolf culling on livestock predation when considering wolf population dynamics in an individual-based model. Wildlife Biology 2024(6), e01227.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Heinsohn R, Lacy R, Elphinstone A, Ingwersen D, Pitcher BJ, Roderick M, Schmelitschek E, Van Sluys M, Stojanovic D, Tripovich J, Crates R (2022) Population viability in data deficient nomadic species: What it will take to save regent honeyeaters from extinction. Biological Conservation 266, 109430.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kauhala K, Kurkilahti M, Ahola MP, Herrero A, Karlsson O, Kunnasranta M, Tiilikainen R, Vetemaa M (2015) Age, sex and body condition of Baltic grey seals: are problem seals a random sample of the population? Annales Zoologici Fennici 52(1–2), 103-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
König HJ, Kiffner C, Kramer-Schadt S, Fürst C, Keuling O, Ford AT (2020) Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world. Conservation Biology 34(4), 786-794.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lacy RC, Pollak JP (2023) Vortex: a stochastic simulation of the extinction process (version 10.6.0). Available at https://scti.tools/vortex/ [accessed 11 February 2025]
Lacy RC, Miller PS, Traylor-Holzer K (2021) Vortex 10 user’s manual (30 March 2021 update). Available at https://scti.tools/downloads/#SoftwareAndManuals [accessed 11 February 2025]
Lennox RJ, Gallagher AJ, Ritchie EG, Cooke SJ (2018) Evaluating the efficacy of predator removal in a conflict-prone world. Biological Conservation 224, 277-289.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Letnic M, Ritchie EG, Dickman CR (2012) Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo (Canis lupus dingo) as a case study. Biological Reviews 87(2), 390-413.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lorand C, Robert A, Gastineau A, Mihoub J-B, Bessa-Gomes C (2022) Effectiveness of interventions for managing human-large carnivore conflicts worldwide: scare them off, don’t remove them. Science of The Total Environment 838, 156195.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Merli E, Mattioli L, Bassi E, Bongi P, Berzi D, Ciuti F, Luccarini S, Morimando F, Viviani V, Caniglia R, Galaverni M, Fabbri E, Scandura M, Apollonio M (2023) Estimating wolf population size and dynamics by field monitoring and demographic models: implications for management and conservation. Animals 13(11), 1735.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
MidCoast Council (2019) Procedure on the management of dingoes in residential areas and council managed spaces in Hawks Nest. Available at https://www.midcoast.nsw.gov.au/files/assets/public/v/1/document-resources/council/projects-documents/dingo-management/hawks-nest-dingo_wild-dog-management-procedure.pdf [accessed 11 February 2025]
Mills KJ, Patterson BR, Murray DL (2008) Direct estimation of early survival and movements in eastern wolf pups. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72(4), 949-954.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Morehouse AT, Boyce MS (2017) Troublemaking carnivores: conflicts with humans in a diverse assemblage of large carnivores. Ecology and Society 22(3), 4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moseby KE, Peacock DE, Read JL (2015) Catastrophic cat predation: a call for predator profiling in wildlife protection programs. Biological Conservation 191, 331-340.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nyhus PJ (2016) Human-wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41, 143-171.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biological Conservation 133(1), 42-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Neill A, Cairns K, Kaplan G, Healy E (2016) Managing dingoes on Fraser Island: culling, conflict, and an alternative. Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 4-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Possingham HP, Lindenmayer DB, Norton TW (1994) A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on Population Viability Analysis (PVA). Pacific Conservation Biology 1(1), 39-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Reed JM, Mills LS, Dunning JB, Jr., Menges ES, McKelvey KS, Frye R, Beissinger SR, Anstett M-C, Miller P (2002) Emerging issues in population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 16(1), 7-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 43(6), 1049-1055.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Slotta-Bachmayr L, Boegel R, Kaczensky P, Stauffer C, Walzer C (2004) Use of population viability analysis to identify management priorities and success in reintroducing Przewalski’s horses to southwestern Mongolia. The Journal of Wildlife Management 68(4), 790-798.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Smith BP, Litchfield CA (2009) A review of the relationship between Indigenous Australians, dingoes (Canis dingo) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anthrozoös 22(2), 111-128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Smith BP, Appleby RG, Jordan NR (2021a) Co-existing with dingoes: challenges and solutions to implementing non-lethal management. Australian Zoologist 41(3), 491-510.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Smith BP, Jaques NB, Appleby RG, Morris S, Jordan NR (2021b) Automated shepherds: responses of captive dingoes to sound and an inflatable, moving effigy. Pacific Conservation Biology 27(2), 195-201.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Swan GJF, Redpath SM, Bearhop S, McDonald RA (2017) Ecology of problem individuals and the efficacy of selective wildlife management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32(7), 518-530.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Tatler J, Prowse TAA, Roshier DA, Cairns KM, Cassey P (2021) Phenotypic variation and promiscuity in a wild population of pure dingoes (Canis dingo). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 59(1), 311-322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
van Eeden LM, Crowther MS, Dickman CR, Macdonald DW, Ripple WJ, Ritchie EG, Newsome TM (2018) Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock. Conservation Biology 32(1), 26-34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
van Eeden LM, Crowther MS, Dickman CR, Newsome TM (2021) Wicked ‘wild dogs’: Australian public awareness of and attitudes towards dingoes and dingo management. Australian Zoologist 41(3), 467-479.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
