Assessing the long-range performance of copper bullets on North American elk (Cervus canadensis)
Craig Jourdonnais A , Michael McTee
A * , Mike Henning B and Philip Ramsey A
A
B
Abstract
Recent advancements in firearm technology have enabled hunters to take increasingly longer shots at animals (i.e. ≥300 m). The performance of copper bullets at these distances remains largely anecdotal, despite growing use to reduce lead exposure in scavengers and game meat.
We evaluated whether copper bullets perform effectively during long-range hunting and identified possible factors influencing bullet performance and animal recovery.
At MPG Ranch in western Montana, USA, we collected field data from hunters required to use lead-free ammunition. We recorded shot distance, shot placement, copper bullet selection, estimated impact energy, and recovery status of elk (Cervus canadensis). We also measured bullet expansion and weight retention for recovered bullets.
The average shot distance for recovered elk (n = 111) was 305 m, whereas that for unrecovered elk (n = 13) averaged 391 m (t = 3.37, P = 0.002). Proportional odds logistic regression showed that the number of shots impacting elk was predicted by flight distance and whether the bullet was designed to fragment; however, flight distance was not predicted by impact energy or bullet design. Recovered bullets retained 97.2% of their mass (n = 7), and their expansion ratios, calculated as the expanded frontal area divided by the original, ranged from 3.1 to 4.1.
Copper bullets can be effective at long range when used by skilled shooters, with recovery rates being similar to or exceeding those reported in prior studies where ammunition type was likely a mix of lead and lead-free projectiles.
Our findings support the suitability of copper bullets for long-range hunting and suggest that hunter skill and shot distance, rather than bullet material alone, are key factors in animal recovery.
Keywords: ammunition, bullets, lead poisoning, lead-free, scavenger, ungulates, wildlife, wound ballistics.
References
Caudell JN (2013) Review of wound ballistic research and its applicability to wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37(4), 824-831.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Caudell JN, Stopak SR, Wolf PC (2012) Lead-free, high-powered rifle bullets and their applicability in wildlife management. Human-Wildlife Interactions 6, 105-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Doyle M (2023) A lead ammo compromise? Incentives edge out bans. Politico, E&E News. Available at https://www.eenews.net/articles/a-lead-ammo-compromise-incentives-edge-out-bans/ [accessed 20 February 2025]
Epps CW (2014) Considering the switch: challenges of transitioning to non-lead hunting ammunition. The Condor: Ornithological Applications 116(3), 429-434.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Every M (2024) Long range hunting: good, bad, or both? Available at https://www.fieldandstream.com/hunting/long-range-hunting [accessed 20 February 2025]
Gremse FO, Krone O, Thamm M, Kiessling F, Tolba RH, Rieger S, Gremse C (2014) Performance of lead-free versus lead-based hunting ammunition in ballistic soap. PLoS ONE 9(7), e102015.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hampton JO, Adams PJ, Forsyth DM, Cowled BD, Stuart IG, Hyndman TH, Collins T (2016) Improving animal welfare in wildlife shooting: the importance of projectile energy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 40(4), 678-686.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hampton JO, Eccles G, Hunt R, Bengsen AJ, Perry AL, Parker S, Miller CJ, Joslyn SK, Stokke S, Arnemo JM, Hart Q (2021a) A comparison of fragmenting lead-based and lead-free bullets for aerial shooting of wild pigs. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0247785.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hampton JO, Arnemo JM, Barnsley R, Cattet M, Daoust P-Y, DeNicola AJ, Eccles G, Fletcher D, Hinds LA, Hunt R, Portas T, Stokke S, Warburton B, Wimpenny C (2021b) Animal welfare testing for shooting and darting free-ranging wildlife: a review and recommendations. Wildlife Research 48(7), 577-589.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hampton JO, Bengsen AJ, Flesch JS, Toop SD, Davies C, Forsyth DM, Kanstrup N, Stokke S, Arnemo JM (2022) A comparison of lead-based and lead-free bullets for shooting sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) in Australia. Wildlife Research 50(9), 632-641.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hunt WG, Watson RT, Oaks JL, Parish CN, Burnham KK, Tucker RL, Belthoff JR, Hart G (2009) Lead bullet fragments in venison from rifle-killed deer: potential for human dietary exposure. PLoS ONE 4(4), e5330.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kanstrup N, Balsby TJS, Thomas VG (2016) Efficacy of non-lead rifle ammunition for hunting in Denmark. European Journal of Wildlife Research 62, 333-340.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Katzner TE, Pain DJ, McTee M, Brown L, Cuadros S, Pokras M, Slabe VA, Watson RT, Wiemeyer G, Bedrosian B, Hampton JO, Parish CN, Pay JM, Saito K, Schulz JH (2024) Lead poisoning of raptors: state of the science and cross-discipline mitigation options for a global problem. Biological Reviews 99(5), 1672-1699.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kauffman V (2024) US Fish and Wildlife Service announces voluntary pilot programs for lead-free hunting. Seven national wildlife refuges to pilot incentive-based rebate program to hunters who voluntarily use lead-free ammunition. US Fish & Wildlife Services. Available at https://www.fws.gov/press-release/2024-07/us-fish-and-wildlife-service-announces-voluntary-pilot-programs-lead-free [accessed 20 February 2025]
Kelly TR, Bloom PH, Torres SG, Hernandez YZ, Poppenga RH, Boyce WM, Johnson CK (2011) Impact of the California lead ammunition ban on reducing lead exposure in golden eagles and turkey vultures. PLoS ONE 6(4), e17656.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Martin A, Gremse C, Selhorst T, Bandick N, Müller-Graf C, Greiner M, Lahrssen-Wiederholt M (2017) Hunting of roe deer and wild boar in Germany: is non-lead ammunition suitable for hunting? PLoS ONE 12(9), e0185029.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McCann BE, Whitworth W, Newman RA (2016) Efficacy of non-lead ammunition for culling elk at Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Human–Wildlife Interactions 10(2), 268-282.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McTee M, Parish CN, Jourdonnais C, Ramsey P (2023) Weight retention and expansion of popular lead-based and lead-free hunting bullets. Science of The Total Environment 904, 166288.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McTee M, Casper C, Deeble B, Grimes M, Henning M, Jourdonnais C, Ramsey P (2025) Evaluating the precision and velocity of factory vs. handloaded lead-free ammunition. Wildlife Society Bulletin 49(1), e1570.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks (2025) Population and distribution. Available at https://fwp.mt.gov/conservation/wildlife-management/elk/population-and-distribution [accessed 20 February 2025]
Reed D, Berg PT, Marchello M, Young JM, Berg EP (2019) Product yield and fatty acid content of north dakota mule deer, elk, and moose. Meat and Muscle Biology 3(1), 324-329.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 676-682.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Snow J (2013) Killing energy: how much do you need for big game? Outdoor Life. Available at https://www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/gun-shots/2013/10/killing-energy-how-much-do-you-need-big-game/ [accessed 6 February 2025]
Sonne C, Adams DH, Alstrup AKO, Lam SS, Dietz R, Kanstrup N (2022) Denmark passes total ban of leaded ammunition. Science 377(6610), 1054-1055.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Stokke S, Arnemo JM, Brainerd S, Söderberg A, Kraabøl M, Ytrehus B (2018) Defining animal welfare standards in hunting: body mass determines thresholds for incapacitation time and flight distance. Scientific Reports 8, 13786.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Stokke S, Arnemo JM, Brainerd S (2019) Unleaded hunting: are copper bullets and lead-based bullets equally effective for killing big game? Ambio 48, 1044-1055.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
The Boone and Crockett Club (2021) B&C position statement – long range shooting. Available at https://www.boone-crockett.org/bc-position-statement-long-range-shooting [accessed 6 February 2025]
Towsley BM (2018) Long-range hunting: how far is too far? National Rifle Association. Available at https://www.nrafamily.org/content/long-range-hunting-how-far-is-too-far/ [accessed 20 February 2025]
Trinogga A, Fritsch G, Hofer H, Krone O (2013) Are lead-free hunting rifle bullets as effective at killing wildlife as conventional lead bullets? A comparison based on wound size and morphology. Science of the Total Environment 443, 226-232.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Will DD, Whiting TL (2019) Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet II: Target selection. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 60(10), 1051-1056.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
