Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The dynamics of feral pig (Sus scrofa) populations in response to food supply

Matthew Gentle https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4201-629X A D , Anthony Pople B , Joseph C. Scanlan A and John Carter C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Invasive Plants and Animals, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 203 Tor St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

B Invasive Plants and Animals, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia.

C Remote Sensing, Department of Environment and Science (DES), 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: matthew.gentle@daf.qld.gov.au

Wildlife Research 46(3) 191-204 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17176
Submitted: 5 December 2017  Accepted: 29 December 2018   Published: 4 April 2019

Abstract

Context: Feral pigs (Sus scrofa) are highly fecund, and populations can increase rapidly under favourable conditions. Population size can also fluctuate widely, driven largely by changes in juvenile mortality in response to food availability, but these relationships have only been explored on a limited number of sites and over short periods.

Aims: The present study aimed to investigate and quantify the numerical response of feral pig populations to changes in their food supply in north-eastern Australia.

Methods: Pig population densities were determined from aerial surveys conducted over a 21-year period on 10 regional blocks (~2000–6000 km2) throughout the Queensland rangelands. Densities were used to calculate annual exponential rates of increase (r), which were then corrected for anthropogenic mortality (baiting and commercial harvesting). Six proxy measures of annual food supply, including rainfall, pasture biomass and pasture growth (using the AussieGRASS model), were calculated for each survey block, and assessed as predictors of corrected r. The rates of increase predicted from the first half of the data series were then applied to initial population densities to estimate successive pig densities during the second period in each bioregion.

Key results: The most parsimonious model of the numerical response had parameters common to three bioregions, with rainfall in the 12 months between surveys being the best predictor variable. Modelled densities for each bioregion were a good fit to actual, observed densities. Relationships between r and each measure of food supply at the individual block level were inconsistent.

Conclusions: Using rainfall as a measure of food supply, the numerical response relationship provides a method for predicting the dynamics of feral pig populations at the bioregional scale. Predicting population dynamics at any one site using this relationship is less precise, suggesting that differences in landscape composition affect utilisation of resources supporting population growth.

Implications: The results from the present study could be used to predict feral pig population changes at the bioregional level, supplementing or reducing the need for more frequent, expensive population surveys. This improved ability to predict fluctuations in regional feral pig populations can help guide future management actions.

Additional keywords: density, exotic pest, modelling, numerical response, Suidae.


References

Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Thompson, W. L. (2000). Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence and an alternative. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64, 912–923.
Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence and an alternative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bayliss, P. (1987). Kangaroo dynamics. In ‘Kangaroos: Their Ecology and Management in the Sheep Rangelands of Australia’. (Eds G. Caughley, N. C. Shepherd and J. Short.) pp. 119–134. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Bengsen, A. J., Gentle, M. N., Mitchell, J. L., Pearson, H. E., and Saunders, G. R. (2014). Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia. Mammal Review 44, 135–147.
Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caughley, G. (1977). ‘Analysis of Vertebrate Populations.’ (John Wiley and Sons: London).

Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Laake, J. L. (1993). ‘Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.’ (Chapman and Hall: London, UK.)

Bureau of Meteorology (2015). Recent rainfall, drought and southern Australia’s long-term rainfall decline. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/updates/articles/a010-southern-rainfall-decline.shtml [Verified February 2019]

Caley, P. (1993). Population dynamics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical riverine habitat complex. Wildlife Research 20, 625–636.
Population dynamics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical riverine habitat complex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carter, J. O., Hall, W. B., Brook, K. D., McKeon, G. M., Day, K. A., and Paull, C. J. (2000). AussieGRASS: Australian Grassland and Rangeland Assessment by Spatial Simulation. In ‘Applications of Seasonal Climate Forecasting in Agricultural and Natural Ecosystems – the Australian Experience’. (Eds G. Hammer, N. Nicholls and C. Mitchell.) pp. 329–349. (Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.)

Choquenot, D. (1998). Testing the relative influence of intrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability on feral pig populations in Australia’s rangelands. Journal of Animal Ecology 67, 887–907.
Testing the relative influence of intrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability on feral pig populations in Australia’s rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26412369PubMed |

Choquenot, D., and Ruscoe, W. A. (2003). Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of feral pigs. Journal of Animal Ecology 72, 14–26.
Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of feral pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choquenot, D., McIlroy, J., and Korn, T. (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Cowled, B. D., Lapidge, S. J., Smith, M., and Staples, L. (2006). Attractiveness of a novel omnivore bait, PIGOUT®, to feral pigs (Sus scrofa) and assessment of risks of bait uptake by non-target species. Wildlife Research 33, 651–660.
Attractiveness of a novel omnivore bait, PIGOUT®, to feral pigs (Sus scrofa) and assessment of risks of bait uptake by non-target species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis, S. A., Pech, R. P., and Catchpole, E. A. (2002). Populations in variable environments: the effect of variability in a species’ primary resource. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 357, 1249–1257.
Populations in variable environments: the effect of variability in a species’ primary resource.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12396516PubMed |

DEHP (2015). 2016 quota submissions for commerically harvested macropods in Queensland. Macropod Management Program, Southern Region, Environmental Services and Regulation, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Brisbane.

Froese, J. G., Smith, C. S., Durr, P. A., McAlpine, C. A., and van Klinken, R. D. (2017). Modelling seasonal habitat suitability for wide-ranging species: Invasive wild pigs in northern Australia. PLoS One 12, .
Modelling seasonal habitat suitability for wide-ranging species: Invasive wild pigs in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28472113PubMed |

Gaillard, J. M., Festa-Bianchet, M., and Yoccoz, N. G. (1998). Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13, 58–63.
Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gentle, M., and Pople, A. (2013). Effectiveness of commercial harvesting in controlling feral-pig populations. Wildlife Research 40, 459–469.
Effectiveness of commercial harvesting in controlling feral-pig populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gentle, M. N., Saunders, G. R., and Dickman, C. R. (2007). Poisoning for production: how effective is fox baiting in south-eastern Australia? Mammal Review 37, 177–190.
Poisoning for production: how effective is fox baiting in south-eastern Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gentle, M., Speed, J., and Marshall, D. (2015). Consumption of crops by feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Australian Mammalogy 37, 194–200.
Consumption of crops by feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a fragmented agricultural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Giles, J. R. (1980). The ecology of feral pigs in western New South Wales. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.

Hone, J. (1999). On rate of increase (r): patterns of variation in Australian mammals and implications for wildlife management. Journal of Applied Ecology 36, 709–718.
On rate of increase (r): patterns of variation in Australian mammals and implications for wildlife management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hone, J. (2002). Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts and management. Biological Conservation 105, 231–242.
Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., Gačić, D., Šprem, N., Kamler, J., Baubet, E., Hohmann, U., Monaco, A., Ozoliņš, J., Cellina, S., Podgórski, T., Fonseca, C., Markov, N., Pokorny, B., Rosell, C., and Náhlik, A. (2015). Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Management Science 71, 492–500.
Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25512181PubMed |

McKnight, T. (1976). ‘Friendly Vermin: a Survey of Feral Livestock in Australia.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.)

Mitchell, J. (1998). The effectiveness of aerial baiting for control of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Queensland. Wildlife Research 25, 297–303.
The effectiveness of aerial baiting for control of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pavlov, P. M. (1980). The diet and general ecology of the feral pig (Sus scrofa) at Girilambone, N.S.W. M.Sc. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.

Pople, A. R., Grigg, G. C., Phinn, S. R., Menke, N., McAlpine, C., and Possingham, H. P. (2010). Reassessing the spatial and temporal dynamics of kangaroo populations. In ‘Macropods: The Biology of Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-kangaroos’. (Eds G. Coulson and M. D. B. Eldridge.) pp. 197–210. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Queensland Herbarium (2015). Regional Ecosystem Description Database (REDD). Version 9.0. April 2015 edn. (Queensland Department of Environment and Science: Brisbane.)

R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

State of Queensland (2017). ‘Land Types of Queensland.’ (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries: Brisbane.)

Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T., Rexstad, E. A., Laake, J. L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S. L., Bishop, J. R. B., Marques, T. A., and Burnham, K. P. (2010). Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 5–14.
Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20383262PubMed |

Woodall, P. F. (1983). Distribution and population dynamics of dingoes (Canis familiaris) and feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in Queensland, 1945–1976. Journal of Applied Ecology 20, 85–95.
Distribution and population dynamics of dingoes (Canis familiaris) and feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in Queensland, 1945–1976.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |