Motivations for conservation action in peopled landscapes
D. F. Shanahan A C , J. E. Ledington A and F. J. F. Maseyk B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for People and Nature, Zealandia, 31 Waiapu Road, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand.
B The Catalyst Group, PO Box 362, Palmerston North 4440, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: danielleshanahan@gmail.com
Pacific Conservation Biology 24(4) 341-348 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18010
Submitted: 24 January 2018 Accepted: 19 March 2018 Published: 19 April 2018
Abstract
Urbanisation can drive wholesale change of ecosystems, and so biodiversity conservation action in these landscapes must overcome significant challenges. Despite this, councils and city residents invest significant resources into managing and promoting biodiversity in cities, often independently from wider-scale conservation objectives. In this paper we first examine biodiversity strategies from cities (Australia and New Zealand) and countries (Pacific Islands) to identify key ‘motivations’ for conservation action in peopled landscapes – this information is critical to guide how conservation planners can leverage effort in these spaces for broader conservation gain. We found that enhancing human well-being is a key motivator for biodiversity conservation in peopled landscapes; for example, 100% of strategies identified cultural ecosystem services as a key motivator. This trend reflects the importance of biodiversity in cities for people. This study raises a crucial question: what conservation outcomes might be possible from conservation action in cities where the key desired outcome is for people? We use two case studies to examine this question (threatened plant and threatened bird conservation in New Zealand cities), showing that conservation action in cities can deliver significant benefits that contribute to broader conservation objectives. We conclude that these benefits arise for several reasons: urban landscapes can leverage considerable people-power, the highly disturbed landscape can provide significant advantages for conservation action for some species, and enabling people to connect with nature and carry out conservation action can galvanise community effort for even greater conservation gain. If conservation planners can identify ways to leverage this effort for broader outcomes the results can be exceptional.
Additional keywords: biodiversity conservation, saddleback, threatened plants, urban nature, urbanisation
References
Adelaide City Council (2016). City of Adelaide 2016–2020 strategic plan. City of Adelaide.Asah, S. T., and Blahna, D. J. (2013). Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Conservation Biology 27, 866–875.
| Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Auckland Council (2012). Auckland Council’s indigenous biodiversity strategy. Auckland Council, Auckland, New Zealand.
Barrico, L., and Castro, P. (2016). Urban biodiversity and cities’ sustainable development. In ‘Biodiversity and Education for Sustainable Development’. (Eds P. Castro, U. M. Azeiteiro, P. BacelarNicolau, W. L. Filho, and A. M. Azul.) pp. 29–42. (Springer: Dordrecht.)
Beissinger, S. R., and Osborne, D. R. (1982). Effects of urbanisation on avian community organization. The Condor 84, 75–83.
| Effects of urbanisation on avian community organization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blair, R. (2004). The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society 9, art2.
| The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brisbane City Council (2013). Brisbane Vision 2031. Brisbane City Council, Brisbane, Australia.
Brisbane City Council (2015). Environmental management and compliance levy report. Brisbane City Council, Brisbane, Australia.
Brisbane City Council (2017). How rates are calculated. Brisbane City Council, Brisbane, Australia.
Bruyere, B., and Rappe, S. (2007). Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50, 503–516.
| Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cairns Regional Council (2012). Biodiversity strategy 2012–2022. Cairns Regional Council, Cairns, Australia.
Catterall, C. P. (2009). Responses of faunal assemblages to urbanisation: global reseach paradigms and an avian case study. In ‘Ecology of Cities and Towns – A Comparative Approach’. (Eds M. J. McDonnell, A. K. Hahs, and J. H. Breuste.) pp. 129–155. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
Christchurch City Council (2008). Christchurch City Council biodiversity strategy 2008–2035. Christchurch City Council, Christchurch, New Zealand.
City of Melbourne (2017). Nature in the city: thriving biodiversity and healthy ecosystems. The City of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
City of Perth (2015). Draft environment strategy 2015–2031. City of Perth, Perth, Australia.
City of Sydney (2014). Urban ecology strategic action plan. City of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Cox, D. T. C., Shanahan, D. F., Hudson, H. L., Fuller, R. A., Anderson, K., Hancock, S., and Gaston, K. J. (2017). Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits. nternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, 172.
| Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Lange, P., and Jones, C. (2000). Shrubby tororaro (Muehlenbeckia astonii Petrie) recovery plan 2000–2010. Threatened Species Recovery Plan 31. Biodiversity Recovery Unit, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
de Lange, P., Heenan, P., Norton, D., Rolfe, J., and Swayer. J. (2010). Threatened Plants of New Zealand. (Canterbury University Press: Christchurch.)
Dearborn, D. C., and Kark, S. (2010). Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conservation Biology 24, 432–440.
| Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Environment and Conservation (2007). Papua New Guinea national biodiversity strategy and action plan. Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Papua New Guinea, Boroko, Papua New Guinea.
Dunedin City Council (2007). A biodiversity strategy for Dunedin City Council. Dunedin City Council, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Fijian Government (2006). Fiji biodiversity strategy and action plan. Suva, Fiji.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters 3, 390–394.
| Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gascon, C., and Lovejoy, T. E. (1998). Ecological impacts of forest fragmentation in central Amazonia. Zoology-Analysis of Complex Systems 101, 273–280.
Broussard, S. C., and Garrison, M. E. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 33, 106–120.
| The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school aged children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hamilton City Council (2008). Environmental Sustainability Strategy. Hamilton City Council, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ives, C. D., Lentini, P. E., Threlfall, C. G., Ikin, K., Shanahan, D. F., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Fuller, R. A., Mumaw, L., Rayner, L., Rowe, R., Valentine, L. E., and Kendal, D. (2016). Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Global Ecology and Biogeography 25, 117–126.
| Cities are hotspots for threatened species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior 33, 507–542.
| The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maseyk, F. J. F., Mackay, A. D., Possingham, H. P., Dominati, E. J., and Buckley, Y. M. (2017). Managing natural capital stocks for the provision of ecosystem services. Conservation Letters 10, 211–220.
| Managing natural capital stocks for the provision of ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McArthur, N., Flux, I., and Harvey, A. (2017). State and trends in the diversity, abundance and distribution of birds in Wellington City. Client report prepared for Greater Wellington Regional Council. Wildlife Management International Ltd. Blenheim, New Zealand.
Miller, J. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 430–434.
| Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Meteorology. (2009). Solomon Islands national biodiversity strategic action plan. Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Meteorology, Government of the Solomon Islands, Solomon Islands.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (2015). Samoa’s national biodiversity strategy and action plan. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Samoan Government, Samoa.
Mitchell, R., and Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372, 1655–1660.
| Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nelson Biodiversity Forum (2013). Nelson biodiversity strategy. Nelson Biodiversity Forum, Nelson, New Zealand.
Polhill Protectors (2017). Polhill Protectors. Available at: https://polhill.org.nz/ [accessed 14 March 2018].
Robertson, H. A., Baird, K., Dowding, J. E., Elliott, G. P., Hitchmough, R. A., Miskelly, C. M., McArthur, N., O’Donnell, C. F. J., Sagar, P. M., Scofield, R. P., and Taylor, G. A. (2016). Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2016. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 19. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sawyer, J. (2005). Saving threatened native plant species in cities – from traffic islands to real islands. Section 2: Nature friendly environments – communities making it happen. In ‘Greening the City: Bringing Biodiversity Back into the Urban Environment’. (Ed. M.I. Dawson.) pp. 111–117. (Royal New Zealand Institute of Horticulture: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Shanahan, D. F., Strohbach, M. W., Warren, P. S., and Fuller, R. A. (2014). The challenges of urban living. In ‘Avian Urban Ecology’. (Eds D. Gill and H. Brumm.) pp. 3–20. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)
Shanahan, D. F., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Lin, B. B., and Gaston, K. J. (2015a). The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need? Bioscience 65, 476–485.
| The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shanahan, D. F., Lin, B. B., Gaston, K., Bush, R., and Fuller, R. A. (2015b). What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks? Landscape Ecology 30, 153–165.
| What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Dean, J., Barber, E., and Fuller, R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports 6, 28551.
| Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharma, G. P., and Raghubanshi, A. S. (2010). How lantana invades dry deciduous forest: a case study from Vindhyan highlands, India. Tropical Ecology 51, 305–316.
Stanley, B. (2015). The Pale Flowering Kūmarahou. Auckland Botanical Gardens Conservation Articles. Available at: http://www.aucklandbotanicgardens.co.nz/science/conservation/articles/the-pale-flowering-k%C5%ABmarahou/ [accessed 8 November 2017].
Sushinsky, J. R., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P., Gill, T. K., and Fuller, R. A. (2013). How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts? Global Change Biology 19, 401–410.
| How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
The City of Newcastle (2006). Newcastle biodiversity strategy. The City of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
The World Bank (2017). The United Nations Population Division’s world urbanization prospects: urban population (% of total). The World Bank, Washington DC.
Tonga Department of Environment (2006). Kingdom of Tonga national biodiversity strategy and action plan. Department of Environment, Nuku‘alofa, Tonga.
UN-DESAPD (2014). World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, New York.
Wellington City Council (2015). Our natural capital: Wellington’s biodiversity strategy and action plan 2015. Wellington City Council, Wellington, New Zealand.
