Biodiversity in court: will the Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) make the EPBC Act irrelevant?
David Lindenmayer
A * and Peter Burnett B
A Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B College of Law, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Pacific Conservation Biology 28(5) 393-397 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21035
Submitted: 4 June 2021 Accepted: 9 July 2021 Published: 21 September 2021
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Two key pieces of Australian legislation regarding the protection of biodiversity and forest management are the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 and the Regional Forest Agreements (RFA) Act 2002. Both have significant deficiencies. A Federal Court ruling associated with a challenge to the Victorian Government-owned logging company, VicForests, by a community environmental group (Friends of Leadbeater’s Possum Inc.) found that RFAs are exempt from the EPBC Act. There was an argument of legal interpretation concerning the exemption in the EPBC and RFA Acts relating to RFA forestry operations that are conducted ‘in accordance with’ an RFA. The Court held that ‘in accordance with’ only required that forestry operations be ‘conducted under’ an RFA rather than ‘in compliance’ with it. Therefore, the mere existence of the RFA is enough to exclude the biodiversity protections of the EPBC Act, even where there are extensive breaches of codes of practice for logging operations and logging is demonstrably unsustainable in terms of its environmental impacts. This amounts to the loss of the ‘safety net’ provided by EPBC Act to protect threatened forest-dependent species. The decision in the Federal Court highlights how deficient Australia’s environmental laws are in conserving the nation’s biodiversity, especially for forest-dependent threatened species. The ruling serves to further weaken already very weak legislation. Major reforms to the EPBC Act are urgently required.
Keywords: biodiversity, conservation policy, environmental management, EPBC Act, Leadbeater’s possum, legislation, regional forest agreement, RFA, VicForests.
References
Australian Academy of Science (2020) ‘Academy fellows say it’s time to establish an independent biodiversity agency.’ (Australian Academy of Science: Canberra, ACT, Australia)Australian National Audit Office (2020) ‘Referrals, assessments and approvals of controlled actions under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.’ (Australian National Audit Office: Canberra, ACT, Australia). Available at https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/referrals-assessments-and-approvals-controlled-actions-under-the-epbc-act
Brown v Forestry Tasmania (No. 4) (2006) FCA 1729.
Commonwealth of Australia (1997) ‘Central Highlands, com-prehensive regional assessment report.’ (Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: Canberra, ACT, Australia)
Dargavel, J (1998). Politics, policy and process in the forests. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 5, 25–30.
| Politics, policy and process in the forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (2017) ‘Regional forest agreements’, vol. 2017. (Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: Canberra, ACT, Australia). Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.au/forestry/policies/rfa. [Accessed 13 December 2017]
Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts2009 ) ‘The Australian Environment Act – report of the independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.’ (
Fedrowitz, K, Koricheva, J, Baker, SC, Lindenmayer, DB, Palik, B, Rosenvald, R, Beese, W, Franklin, JF, Kouki, J, Macdonald, E, Messier, C, Sverdrup-Thygeson, A, and Gustafsson, L (2014). Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 1669–1679.
| Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forestry Tasmania v Brown (2007 ) FCAFC 186.
Friends of Leadbeater’s Possum Inc. v VicForests (No. 4) (2020 ) FCA 704. Available at https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2020/2020fca0704
Helms JA (1998) ‘The dictionary of forestry.’ (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD, USA)
Horwitz, P, and Calver, M (1998). Credible science? Evaluating the regional forest agreement process in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 5, 213–225.
| Credible science? Evaluating the regional forest agreement process in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkpatrick, JB (1998). Nature conservation and the regional forest agreement process. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 5, 31–37.
| Nature conservation and the regional forest agreement process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, DB (2018). Flawed forest policy: flawed regional forest agreements. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25, 258–266.
| Flawed forest policy: flawed regional forest agreements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, DB, Blair, D, and McBurney, L (2019). Variable retention harvesting in Victoria’s Mountain Ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forests (southeastern Australia). Ecological Processes 8, .
| Variable retention harvesting in Victoria’s Mountain Ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forests (southeastern Australia).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, DB, Blair, D, McBurney, L, and Banks, SC (2015). The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the regional forest agreements in Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 21, 266–270.
| The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the regional forest agreements in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, DB, Blanchard, W, Blair, D, McBurney, L, Taylor, C, Scheele, BC, Westgate, MJ, Robinson, N, and Foster, C (2021). The response of arboreal marsupials to long-term changes in forest disturbance. Animal Conservation 24, 246–258.
| The response of arboreal marsupials to long-term changes in forest disturbance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) ‘Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA)
Samuel G (2020) ‘Independent review of the EPBC Act’. (Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment: Canberra, ACT, Australia). Available at https://epbcactreview.environment.gov.au/resources/final-report
State of Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2014) Code of Practice for Timber Production 2014. Available at https://www.forestsandreserves.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/29311/Code-of-Practice-for-Timber-Production-2014.pdf
Taylor, C, and Lindenmayer, DB (2019). The adequacy of Victoria’s protected areas for conserving its forest-dependent fauna. Austral Ecology 44, 1076–1091.
| The adequacy of Victoria’s protected areas for conserving its forest-dependent fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor, C, and Lindenmayer, DB (2021). Stakeholder engagement in a forest stewardship council controlled wood assessment. Environmental Science & Policy 120, 204–212.
| Stakeholder engagement in a forest stewardship council controlled wood assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tyndale-Biscoe, CH, and Smith, RFC (1969). Studies of the marsupial glider, Schoinobates volans (Kerr). III. Response to habitat destruction. Journal of Animal Ecology 38, 651–659.
| Studies of the marsupial glider, Schoinobates volans (Kerr). III. Response to habitat destruction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
VicForests (2019) ‘Timber release plan 2019: spatial data.’ (VicForests: Melbourne, Vic., Australia). Available at http://www.vicforests.com.au/planning-1/spatial-data. [Accessed 5 May 2019]
VicForests (2021) ‘Annual report: VicForests 2019–2020.’ (VicForests: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
VicForests v Friends of Leadbeater’s Possum Inc. (2021) FCAFC 66. Available at https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2021/2021fcafc0066
Victorian Government, Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2014) ‘Code of Practice for Timber Production.’ (Department of Environment and Primary Industries: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Ward, M, Barmand, S, Watson, J, and Williams, B (2021). Australia faces environmental crisis. Science 371, 1115–1116.
| Australia faces environmental crisis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33707256PubMed |
Ward, MS, Simmonds, JS, Reside, AE, Watson, JEM, Rhodes, JR, Possingham, HP, Trezise, J, Fletcher, R, File, L, and Taylor, M (2019). Lots of loss with little scrutiny: the attrition of habitat critical for threatened species in Australia. Conservation Science and Practice 1, e117.
| Lots of loss with little scrutiny: the attrition of habitat critical for threatened species in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
