Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Learning from successful long-term citizen science programs

Birgita Hansen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3608-7622 A B * and Patrick Bonney A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for eResearch and Digital Innovation, Federation University, PO Box 691, Ballarat, Vic. 3353, Australia.

B Food Agility Cooperative Research Centre, Level 16, 175 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

* Correspondence to: b.hansen@federation.edu.au

Handling Editor: Graham Fulton

Pacific Conservation Biology 29(4) 292-299 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21065
Submitted: 14 October 2021  Accepted: 3 June 2022   Published: 5 July 2022

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC)

Abstract

Citizen science is increasingly recognised as an important, indeed necessary, contribution to environmental research and policy, as well as for fostering stronger relationships between scientists and the broader community. Well-established citizen science projects offer valuable insights by virtue of the long-term contribution of volunteers to sustained research and monitoring activities. Here we draw on two of Australia’s longest running citizen science projects, Waterwatch and the Australian Shorebird Monitoring Program (formerly Shorebirds 2020), to argue that such projects reflect successful citizen science in terms of their program persistence, reputation and impact. This success has been enabled by (1) developing a clear vision; (2) effective knowledge management; (3) relationship building; (4) meaningful volunteer engagement; and (5) a capacity to adapt to change. We recommend that new and emerging projects embed these principles in their program development, particularly those aiming to generate longitudinal datasets while building motivated, informed and connected communities.

Keywords: community-based monitoring, migratory shorebirds, natural resource management, river health, Shorebirds 2020, technology, water quality, Waterwatch.


References

Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV, and Shirk, J (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59, 977–984.
Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bonney, P, Murphy, A, Hansen, B, and Baldwin, C (2020). Citizen science in Australia’s waterways: Investigating linkages with catchment decision-making. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 27, 200–223.
Citizen science in Australia’s waterways: Investigating linkages with catchment decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Byron, I, and Curtis, A (2002). Maintaining volunteer commitment to local watershed initiatives. Environmental Management 30, 59–67.
Maintaining volunteer commitment to local watershed initiatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12053240PubMed |

Callahan, JT (1984). Long-term ecological research. BioScience 34, 363–367.
Long-term ecological research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cappa, F, Laut, J, Nov, O, Giustiniano, L, and Porfiri, M (2016). Activating social strategies: face-to-face interaction in technology-mediated citizen science. Journal of Environmental Management 182, 374–384.
Activating social strategies: face-to-face interaction in technology-mediated citizen science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27498272PubMed |

Carr A (2002) ‘Grass roots and green tape: principles and practices of environmental stewardship.’ (Federation Press: Sydney)

Cnaan, RA, Meijs, L, Brudney, JL, Hersberger-Langloh, S, Okada, A, and Abu-Rumman, S (2021). You thought that this would be easy? Seeking an understanding of episodic volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , 1–13.
You thought that this would be easy? Seeking an understanding of episodic volunteering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Commonwealth of Australia (2015) ‘Wildlife conservation plan for migratory shorebirds.’ (Department of the Environment)

Conrad, CC, and Hilchey, KG (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176, 273–291.
A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20640506PubMed |

Finlayson, CM, and Mitchell, DS (1999). Australian wetlands: the monitoring challenge. Wetlands Ecology and Management 7, 105–112.
Australian wetlands: the monitoring challenge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franklin JF (1989) Importance and justification of long-term studies in ecology. In ‘Long-term studies in ecology’. (Ed. GE Likens) pp. 3–19. (Springer: New York, NY)

Gosbell, K, and Clemens, R (2006). Population monitoring in Australia: some insights after 25 years and future directions. Stilt 50, 162–175.

Hansen BD, Clemens RS, Gallo-Cajiao E, Jackson MV, Kingsford RT, Maguire GS, Maurer G, Milton D, Rogers DI, Weller DR, Weston MA, Woehler EJ, Fuller RA (2019) Shorebird monitoring in Australia: a successful long-term collaboration among citizen scientists, governments and researchers. In ‘Monitoring threatened species and ecological communities’. (Eds S Legge, DB Lindenmayer, NM Robinson, BC Scheele, DM Southwell, BA Wintle) pp. 149–164. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Haywood, BK (2016). Beyond data points and research contributions: the personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement 6, 239–262.
Beyond data points and research contributions: the personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hecker, S, Bonney, R, Haklay, M, Hölker, F, Hofer, H, Goebel, C, Gold, M, Makuch, Z, Ponti, M, Richter, A, Robinson, L, Iglesias, JR, Owen, R, Peltola, T, Sforzi, A, Shirk, J, Vogel, J, Vohland, K, Witt, T, and Bonn, A (2018). Innovation in citizen science – perspectives on science-policy advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 3, 1–14.
Innovation in citizen science – perspectives on science-policy advances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Himmelman, AT (2001). On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology 29, 277–284.
On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11446282PubMed |

Khiste, GP, Maske, DB, and Deshmukh, RK (2018). Knowledge management output in scopus during 2007 to 2016. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 8, 10–19.
Knowledge management output in scopus during 2007 to 2016.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McKinley, DC, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Ballard, HL, Bonney, R, Brown, H, Cook-Patton, SC, Evans, DM, French, RA, Parrish, JK, Phillips, TB, Ryan, SF, Shanley, LA, Shirk, JL, Stepenuck, KF, Weltzin, JF, Wiggins, A, Boyle, OD, Briggs, RD, Chapin, SF, Hewitt, DA, Preuss, PW, and Soukup, MA (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation 208, 15–28.
Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller-Rushing, A, Primack, R, and Bonney, R (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10, 285–290.
The history of public participation in ecological research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mould, SA, Fryirs, KA, and Howitt, R (2020). The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation. Ecology and Society 25, 17.
The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newig, J, and Fritsch, O (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 19, 197–214.
Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Queensland Wader Study Group (2017) Low tide survey of shorebirds at Toondah Harbour within the Moreton Bay Marine Park during the summer 2016-17. QWSG, Qld, Australia.

Ramkissoon, H, Weiler, B, and Smith, LDG (2012). Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: the development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 20, 257–276.
Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: the development of a conceptual framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robinson LD, Cawthray JL, West SE, Bonn A, Ansine J (2019) Ten principles of citizen science. In ‘Citizen science: innovation in open science, society and policy’. (Eds S Hecker, M Haklay, A Bowser) pp. 27–40. (UCL Press)

Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME, and Bonney, R (2012). Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17, 29.
Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steven, R, Barnes, M, Garnett, ST, Garrard, G, O’Connor, J, Oliver, JL, Robinson, C, Tulloch, A, and Fuller, RA (2019). Aligning citizen science with best practice: threatened species conservation in Australia. Conservation Science and Practice 1, e100.
Aligning citizen science with best practice: threatened species conservation in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Studds, CE, Kendall, BE, Murray, NJ, Wilson, HB, Rogers, DI, Clemens, RS, Gosbell, K, Hassell, CJ, Jessop, R, Melville, DS, Milton, DA, Minton, CDT, Possingham, HP, Riegen, AC, Straw, P, Woehler, EJ, and Fuller, RA (2017). Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites. Nature Communications 8, 14895.
Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28406155PubMed |

Thomson D (2007) Waterwatch – an integrated capacity building initiative. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th Australian stream management conference. Australian rivers: making a difference’. (Charles Sturt University: Thurgoona, NSW)

Vetter, J (2011). Introduction: Lay participation in the history of scientific observation. Science in Context 24, 127–141.
Introduction: Lay participation in the history of scientific observation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21797076PubMed |

Vohland K, Land-Zandstra A, Ceccaroni L, Lemmens R, Perelló J, Ponti M, Samson R, Wagenknecht K (2021) ‘The science of citizen science.’ (Springer: Cham)

Watkins D (1993) A national plan for shorebird conservation in Australia. Royal Australasian Ornithologists’ Union report no. 90. RAOU, Melbourne.

Watkins, D, and Russell-French, A (2017). 9th EAAFP meeting of the partners – AWSG report. Tattler 43, 8–9.

West, S, and Pateman, R (2016). Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1, 1–10.
Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson, JR (2001). The Australasian Wader Studies Group population monitoring program: where to now? Perspectives from the Chair. Stilt 39, 13–26.