Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The success of using trained dogs to locate sparse rodents in pest-free sanctuaries

Anna Gsell A , John Innes B , Pim de Monchy C and Dianne Brunton A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute for Natural Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, North Shore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.

B Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.

C Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust, PO Box 476, Cambridge, New Zealand.

D Corresponding author. Email: d.h.brunton@massey.ac.nz

Wildlife Research 37(1) 39-46 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09117
Submitted: 7 July 2009  Accepted: 14 December 2009   Published: 1 March 2010

Abstract

Context. Better techniques to detect small numbers of mammalian pests such as rodents are required both to complete large-scale eradications in restoration areas and to detect invaders before they become abundant or cause serious impacts on biodiversity.

Aims. To evaluate the ability of certified rodent dogs (Canis familiaris) to locate Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and mice (Mus musculus) or their scent trails at very low densities in field conditions.

Methods. We experimentally tested two rodent dogs by releasing small numbers of laboratory rats and mice in a 63 ha rodent-free forest sanctuary and then determining if the dogs and their handlers could find the rodents and their scent trails. We divided the enclosure into two halves, east and west of the midpoint, and alternated releases daily between the two areas to minimise residual scent between consecutive trials. Radio-tagged rats or mice were released a total of 96 times at random locations that were unknown to handlers, followed for 50–100 m, then caught and either placed in hidden cages at the end of the scent trail or removed from the forest. Handlers and their dogs had up to 6 h to search for rodents.

Key Results. Despite the extremely low density of rodents in the effective research area of 32 ha, both dogs were highly successful at finding rodents, together locating 87% of rats and 80% of mice. Handlers reported few false positive detections. We found that well-trained dogs can effectively cover 30–40 ha of steep forested habitat in half a day (6 h).

Conclusions. Despite the limitations of our study design, we conclude that well-trained rodent dogs may be able to locate wild rodents at low densities in forest situations.

Implications. Our results support the ongoing use of certified dogs to detect rodent survivors and invaders in conservation areas in New Zealand and elsewhere. Additional research is required to trial dogs on experimentally released wild rodents and to compare the cost-effectiveness of dogs with other detection methods.

Additional keywords: canine scent detection, conservation, invasive pests, olfaction, pest management, rodents, wildlife-detecting dogs.


Acknowledgements

We thank Fin Buchanan and Miriam Ritchie in particular for their cooperation during this research. We acknowledge funding from the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology under Contract CO9X0503, and from Environment Waikato via an Environmental Initiatives Fund grant. The Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust kindly allowed us to release rodents into a pest-free sanctuary. We also thank Ric Broadhurst (AgResearch, Hamilton) for providing us with study rats and mice, cages, and helpful advice based on his long-term experience with captive rodents. Fieldwork was carried out by Scott Bartlam, Lucy Bridgman and Neil Fitzgerald (Landcare Research, Hamilton); Mark Lammas, Sven Nielson, Liam O’Halloran, Paul Simpson, Erin Winslade, and Warren Yorston (Maungatautari Trust); and Lynda Bennett and Brian Walton (Maungatautari volunteers). Jamie Mackay (Auckland University) provided us with mouse transmitters, and Debbie Chesterfield (Animal Research Manager, Massey University, Palmerston North) provided rodent cages. Additional advice came from Warren Agnew, Bruce Burns, John Cheyne, Kevin Collins, Craig Gillies, Ian Popay and Scott Theobold. We thank Andrea Taylor and three anonymous referees for comments that substantially improved the manuscript. Approval from the Animal Ethic Committee Massey University for this work was given under the permit AEC protocol 07/55.


References

Armitage P. , Berry G. , and Matthews J. N. S. (2001). ‘Statistical Methods in Medical Research.’ (Blackwell: Oxford.)

Atkinson I. A. E. (1985). The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effect on island avifaunas. In ‘Conservation of Island Birds’. (Ed. P. J. Moors.) pp. 35–81. (International Council for Bird Preservation: Cambridge.)

Ballance A. (2007). ‘Don Merton: The Man Who Saved the Black Robin.’ (Reed Books: Auckland.)

Bekoff, M. (1979). Scent-marking by free-ranging domestic dogs – olfactory and visual components. Biology of Behaviour 4, 123–139.
Butler D. J. (1989). ‘Quest for the Kakapo.’ (Heinemann Reed: Auckland.)

Cablk, M. E. , and Heaton, J. S. (2006). Accuracy and reliability of dogs in surveying for desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Ecological Applications 16, 1926–1935.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Clout M. N. , and Russell J. C. (2006). The eradication of mammals from New Zealand Islands. In ‘Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks’. (Eds F. Koike, M. N. Clout, M. Kawamichi, M. De Poorter and K. Iwatsuki.) pp. 127–141. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

Colbourne, R. (1992). Little spotted kiwi (Apteryx owenii) – recruitment and behaviour of juveniles on Kapiti Island, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 22, 321–328.
Conover M. R. (2007). ‘Predator–Prey Dynamics: The Role of Olfaction’. (CRC Press: London.)

Cowan, P. E. (1992). The eradication of introduced Australian brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, from Kapiti Island, a New Zealand nature reserve. Biological Conservation 61, 217–226.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Day T. , and MacGibbon R. (2007). Multiple-species exclusion fencing and technology for mainland sites. In ‘Managing Vertebrate Invasive Species: Proceedings of an International Symposium’. (Eds G. W. Witmer, W. C. Pitt and K. A. Fagerstone.) pp. 418–433. (USDA/APHIS/WS, National Wildlife Research Center: Fort Collins, CO.)

Dowding, J. E. , and Murphy, E. C. (1994). Ecology of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in a kauri (Agathis australis) forest in Northland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 18, 19–28.
Hill S. , and Hill J. (1987). ‘Richard Henry of Resolution Island.’ (John McIndoe in association with the New Zealand Wildlife Service: Dunedin.)

Hooker, S. , and Innes, J. (1995). Ranging behaviour of forest-dwelling ship rats, Rattus rattus, and effects of poisoning with brodifacoum. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22, 291–304.
Innes J. (2005). Ship rat. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 187–203. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Innes, J. , Warburton, B. , Williams, D. , Speed, H. , and Bradfield, P. (1995). Large-scale poisoning of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in indigenous forests of the North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 19, 5–17.
Johnson G. R. (1977). ‘Tracking Dog: Theory and Method.’ (Arner Publications: Westmoreland, NY.)

Jones, H. P. , Tershy, B. R. , Zavaleta, E. S. , Croll, D. A. , Keitt, B. S. , Finkelstein, M. E. , and Howald, G. R. (2008). Severity of the effects of invasive rats on seabirds: a global review. Conservation Biology 22, 16–26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | King C. M. (2005). ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals.’ 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press: Auckland.)

Lavenex, P. , and Schenk, F. (1998). Olfactory traces and spatial learning in rats. Animal Behaviour 56, 1129–1136.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | MacKay P. , Smith D. A. , Long R. A. , and Parker M. (2008). Scat detection dogs. In ‘Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores’. (Eds R. Long, P. Mackay, W. Zielinski and J. Ray.) pp. 183–222. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

McCulloch, M. , Jezierski, T. , Broffman, M. , Hubbard, A. , Turner, K. , and Janecki, T. (2006). Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers. Integrative Cancer Therapies 5, 30–39.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Ruscoe W. A. , and Murphy E. C. (2005). House mouse. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 204–221. (Oxford University Press: Auckland.)

Russell, J. C. , Towns, D. R. , Anderson, S. H. , and Clout, M. N. (2005). Intercepting the first rat ashore. Nature 437, 1107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Speedy C. , Day T. , and Innes J. (2007). Pest eradication technology – the critical partner to pest exclusion technology: the Maungatautari experience. In ‘Managing Vertebrate Invasive Species: Proceedings of an International Symposium’. (Eds G. W. Witmer, W. C. Pitt and K. A. Fagerstone.) pp. 115–126. (USDA/APHIS/WS, National Wildlife Research Center: Fort Collins, CO.)

Syrotuck W. G. (1972). ‘Scent and the Scenting Dog.’ (Arner Publications: New York, NY.)

Theobald S. W. , and Cheyne J. (2006). ‘Predator Dog Best Practice Manual.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington.)

Thorsen, M. , Shorten, R. , Lucking, R. , and Lucking, V. (2000). Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) on Fregate Island, Seychelles: the invasion; subsequent eradication attempts and implications for the island’s fauna. Biological Conservation 96, 133–138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tschirky F. , Brabec B. , and Kern M. (2001). Avalanche rescue systems in Switzerland: experience and limitations. In ‘Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, 1–6 October 2000, Big Sky, MT’. pp. 369–376. (American Avalanche Association: Bozeman, MT.)

Wallace, D. G. , Gorny, G. , and Whishaw, I. Q. (2002). Rats can track odors, other rats, and themselves: Implications for the study of spatial behavior. Behavioural Brain Research 131, 185–192.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Zwickel F. C. (1980). Use of dogs in wildlife biology. In ‘Wildlife Management Techniques Manual’. (Ed. S. D. Schemnitz.) pp. 531–536. (The Wildlife Society: Washington, DC.)