Goat movement patterns inform management of feral goat populations in semiarid rangelands
K. E. Moseby
A B D , J. L. Read B C and G. E. Andersen B
A Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Ecological Horizons Pty Ltd, PO Box 207, Kimba, SA 5641, Australia.
C School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, SA 5005, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: k.moseby@unsw.edu.au
Wildlife Research - https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20042
Submitted: 16 March 2020 Accepted: 10 June 2020 Published online: 16 September 2020
Abstract
Context: Feral goats (Capra hircus) are a significant pest species throughout southern Australia. They threaten rare plants, contribute to soil erosion, compete with domestic stock, and are implicated in the decline of several native herbivores. Feral goats are a declared pest and control is often implemented.
Aims: We fitted feral goats with GPS collars in semiarid South Australia to determine whether they could provide valuable information for regional management.
Methods: Nineteen feral goats (6 males and 13 females) were fitted with GPS collars between 2009 and 2018. Kernel-density estimates (KDE) were used to estimate annual and seasonal home range and core areas and habitat selection. The effect of monthly rainfall, daily maximum temperatures, and watering points on movement patterns was investigated.
Key results: Stock watering points and rock holes were used by some radio-tracked goats intermittently when available; however, goats survived and reproduced without the use of these water sources. The use of the radio-collared goats as Judas goats helped facilitate the removal of 9725 goats from a 50 000-ha area over 8 years. There was no significant difference between male and female annual or seasonal home ranges, with 95% MCP annual ranges of 11 533 ha and 15 996 ha for males and females respectively. Summer ranges were smaller than winter ranges. There was no difference in daily distance moved between sexes (average 3.4 km), but goats moved further in low-rainfall periods. Goats spent most of their time in mallee woodlands, the dominant habitat type available, but preferred shrubland of >1-m height and used less mallee woodland and shrubland of <1-m height than was expected from availability. During hotter periods, these habitat preferences became more distinct.
Conclusions: To reduce goat abundance on a property, active control and waterpoint closure need to extend more than 15 km from property boundaries, and shrubland habitat of >1-m height should be targeted for control after rainfall events when goats move less. Radio-collared goats provided important habitat-preference information to inform priority areas for goat control remote from water sources.
Implications: Closing artificial watering point and regular trapping and mustering at remaining waters is insufficient to remove residual goat herds without additional targeted control in preferred habitat.
Additional keywords: habitat use, home range, invasive species, judas goats, pest.
References
Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) (2019) Climate data online.Bayne, P., Harden, R., and Davies, I. (2004). Feral goats (Capra hircus L.) in the Macleay River gorge system, north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. I. Impacts on soil erosion. Wildlife Research 31, 519–525.
| Feral goats (Capra hircus L.) in the Macleay River gorge system, north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. I. Impacts on soil erosion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brooks, M. E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K. J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C. W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H. J., Mächler, M., and Bolker, B. M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal 9, 378–400.
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York, NY, USA.)
Burrows, N. D. (2018). Feral animals in the semi-arid and arid regions of Australia: origins, impacts and control. In ‘On the Ecology of Australia’s Arid Zone’. (Ed. H. Lambers.) pp. 331–373. (Springer.)
Calenge, C. (2006). The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197, 516–519.
| The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campbell, K. J., Baxter, G. S., Murray, P. J., Coblentz, B. E., Donlan, C. J., and Carrion, V. (2005). Increasing the efficacy of Judas goats by sterilisation and pregnancy termination. Wildlife Research 32, 737–743.
| Increasing the efficacy of Judas goats by sterilisation and pregnancy termination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Copley, P. B. (1983). Studies on the yellow-footed rock-wallaby, Petrogale xanthopus Gray (Marsupialia: Macropodidae). I. Distribution in South Australia. Wildlife Research 10, 47–61.
| Studies on the yellow-footed rock-wallaby, Petrogale xanthopus Gray (Marsupialia: Macropodidae). I. Distribution in South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freudenberger, D., and Barber, J. (1999). Movement patterns of feral goats in a semi-arid woodland in eastern Australia. The Rangeland Journal 21, 71–81.
| Movement patterns of feral goats in a semi-arid woodland in eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greene, R. S. B., Nettleton, W. D., Chartres, C. J., Leys, J. F., and Cunningham, R. B. (1998). Runoff and micromorphological properties of a grazed haplargid, near Cobar, NSW, Australia. Soil Research 36, 87–108.
| Runoff and micromorphological properties of a grazed haplargid, near Cobar, NSW, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrington, G. N. (1986). Herbivore diet in a semi-arid Eucalyptus populnea woodland. 2. Feral goats. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 26, 423–429.
| Herbivore diet in a semi-arid Eucalyptus populnea woodland. 2. Feral goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heriot, S., Asher, J., Williams, M. R., and Moro, D. (2019). The eradication of ungulates (sheep and goats) from Dirk Hartog Island, Shark Bay World Heritage Area, Australia. Biological Invasions 21, 1789–1805.
| The eradication of ungulates (sheep and goats) from Dirk Hartog Island, Shark Bay World Heritage Area, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holt, C., and Pickles, G. (1996). Home range responses of feral goats. The Rangeland Journal 18, 144–149.
| Home range responses of feral goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jacobs, J. (1974). Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index. Oecologia 14, 413–417.
| Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28308662PubMed |
Johnson, D. H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.
| The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kenward, R. E. (2000). A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press.
King, D. (1992). Home ranges of feral goats in a pastoral area in Western Australia. Wildlife Research 19, 643–649.
| Home ranges of feral goats in a pastoral area in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lethbridge, M. R. (2016). Insights into feral goat movement in Australia using dynamic Brownian Bridges for movement analysis. The Rangeland Journal 38, 343–359.
| Insights into feral goat movement in Australia using dynamic Brownian Bridges for movement analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Letnic, M., Laffan, S., Grenville, A., Russell, B., and Mitchell, B. (2015). Artificial watering points are focal points for activity by an invasive herbivore but not native herbivores in conservation reserves in arid Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 24, 1–16.
| Artificial watering points are focal points for activity by an invasive herbivore but not native herbivores in conservation reserves in arid Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lim, T. L., Sheppard, N., Smith, P., and Smith, J. (1992). The Biology and Management of Yellow-footed Rock-wallaby (Petrogale xanthopus) in NSW. Species Management Report Number 10. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service.
Masters, P., Markopoulos, N., Florance, B., and Southgate, R. (2018). The eradication of fallow deer (Dama dama) and feral goats (Capra hircus) from Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25, 86–98.
| The eradication of fallow deer (Dama dama) and feral goats (Capra hircus) from Kangaroo Island, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Brien, P. H. (1984). Feral goat home range: influence of social class and environmental variables. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12, 373–385.
| Feral goat home range: influence of social class and environmental variables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parkes, J., Henzell, R., Pickles, G., Bureau of Resource Sciences, and Australian Nature Conservation Agency (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Goats.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and R Core Team (2019) ‘nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models.’ R package version 3.1-148. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme [verified 23 July 2020].
R Core Team (2015) ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.)
Rudge, M. R., and Smith, T. J. (1970). Expected rate of increase of hunted populations of feral goats (Capra hircus L.) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Science 13, 256–259.
Russell, B. G., Letnic, M., and Fleming, P. J. S. (2011). Managing feral goat impacts by manipulating their access to water in the rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 33, 143–152.
| Managing feral goat impacts by manipulating their access to water in the rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., Brundige, G. C., Raedeke, K. J., and Gitzen, R. A. (1999). Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 739–747.
| Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Signer, J., and Balkenhol, N. (2015). Reproducible home ranges (rhr): a new, user-friendly R package for analyses of wildlife telemetry data. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, 358–363.
| Reproducible home ranges (rhr): a new, user-friendly R package for analyses of wildlife telemetry data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spencer, S. R., Cameron, G. N., and Swihart, R. K. (1990). Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats. Ecology 71, 1817–1822.
| Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watts, T., and Conley, W. (1984). Reproductive potential and theoretical rates if increase for feral goat populations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 814–822.
| Reproductive potential and theoretical rates if increase for feral goat populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, A., Leigh, J., Hindley, N., and Mulham, W. (1975). Comparison of the diets of goats and sheep on a Casuarina cristata–Heterodendrum oleifolium woodland community in western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 15, 45–53.
| Comparison of the diets of goats and sheep on a Casuarina cristata–Heterodendrum oleifolium woodland community in western New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
