Power and the passion: assessing statistical power with simulations to optimise monitoring of a threatened lizard
Jack Bilby
A B * , Joshua S. Martin C , Kelly Arbon B , Ryan Baring D , Jessica Clayton D and Lucy F. R. Clive B
A
B
C
D
Abstract
Effective ecological surveying is a crucial component of the conservation management of cryptic and threatened species. Ensuring that a survey design has adequate statistical power to confidently detect changes is often overlooked. The pygmy bluetongue (Tiliqua adelaidensis) is an endangered species likely to benefit from increased survey optimisation and structured monitoring efforts across its fragmented and limited distribution.
We compared multiple quadrat sizes on simulated populations of T. adelaidensis at varying densities to evaluate sample sizes and detection rates required to achieve optimal statistical power and assess the ideal quadrat size and number for detecting population changes at Tiliqua Nature Reserve, South Australia.
We employed power analyses to assess the number of 30 × 30-m, 50 × 50-m, and 100 × 100-m quadrats required to detect 10%, 25%, and 50% declines in a simulated population of T. adelaidensis. On the basis of these analyses, we conducted the first site-wide monitoring survey for this species at Tiliqua Nature Reserve and, with the assistance of volunteer citizen scientists, surveyed 25 50 × 50-m quadrats over 5 days, achieving the expected sample size required to detect changes in the population size and estimate population densities for the site.
Our results suggested that 50 × 50-m quadrats were comparable or had significantly higher statistical power than did other quadrat sizes within the survey area and during the sampling period.
This study demonstrated that 50 × 50-m quadrats were the most effective survey strategy for detecting significant population declines of the endangered T. adelaidensis at Tiliqua Nature Reserve. This quadrat size balances survey effort and statistical power, providing a reliable method for long-term monitoring.
The optimised survey design using 50 × 50-m quadrats provides a robust framework for annual monitoring at Tiliqua Nature Reserve and is likely to be a viable method for other properties. This approach to determining survey effort can be applied to similar conservation efforts for other cryptic and threatened species, ensuring more effective use of resources and timely detection of population changes to inform conservation actions.
Keywords: conservation management, population monitoring, power analysis, pygmy bluetongue lizard, survey design, threatened species, Tiliqua adelaidensis, volunteer engagement.
References
Albergoni A, Bride I, Scialfa CT, Jocque M, Green S (2016) How useful are volunteers for visual biodiversity surveys? An evaluation of skill level and group size during a conservation expedition. Biodiversity and Conservation 25, 133-149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Andrew P, Cogger H, Driscoll D, Flakus S, Harlow P, Maple D, Misso M, Pink C, Retallick K, Rose K, Tiernan B, West J, Woinarski JCZ (2018) Somewhat saved: a captive breeding programme for two endemic Christmas Island lizard species, now extinct in the wild. Oryx 52(1), 171-174.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
BOM (2023) Monthly rainfall. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=139&p_display_type=dataFile&p_startYear=&p_c=&p_stn_num=021077 [accessed 10 July 2024]
Bried JT, Pellet J (2012) Optimal design of butterfly occupancy surveys and testing if occupancy converts to abundance for sparse populations. Journal of Insect Conservation 16(4), 489-499.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bull CM, Godfrey SS, Ebrahimi M, Fenner AL (2015) Long and short term residence in refuge burrows by endangered pygmy bluetongue lizards. Amphibia-Reptilia 36(2), 119-124.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Champely S, Ekstrom C, Dalgaard P, Gill J, Weibelzahl S, Anandkumar A, Ford C, Volcic R, De Rosario H, De Rosario MH (2018) Package ‘pwr’. R package version 1(2). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/
Chapple D, Tingley R, Mitchell N, Macdonald S, Keogh JS, Shea G, Bowles P, Cox N, Woinarski J (2019) ‘The action plan for Australian lizards and snakes 2017.’ (CSIRO Publishing) 10.1071/9781486309474
Clayton J, Bull CM (2015) The impact of sheep grazing on burrows for pygmy bluetongue lizards and on burrow digging spiders. Journal of Zoology 297(1), 44-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clayton J, Bull M (2016) The impact of sheep grazing on the depth of spider burrows and of burrows selected by the pygmy bluetongue lizard (Tiliqua adelaidensis). Wildlife Research 43(8), 691-703.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cohen J (1988) ‘Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.’ (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA) 10.4324/9780203771587
Cox N, Young BE, Bowles P, Fernandez M, Marin J, Rapacciuolo G, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Hedges SB, Hilton-Taylor C, Hoffmann M, Jenkins RKB, Tognelli MF, Alexander GJ, Allison A, Ananjeva NB, Auliya M, Avila LJ, Chapple DG, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Cogger HG, Colli GR, de Silva A, Eisemberg CC, Els J, Fong G. A, Grant TD, Hitchmough RA, Iskandar DT, Kidera N, Martins M, Meiri S, Mitchell NJ, Molur S, Nogueira CdC, Ortiz JC, Penner J, Rhodin AGJ, Rivas GA, Rödel M-O, Roll U, Sanders KL, Santos-Barrera G, Shea GM, Spawls S, Stuart BL, Tolley KA, Trape J-F, Vidal MA, Wagner P, Wallace BP, Xie Y (2022) A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods. Nature 605(7909), 285-290.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Delean S, Bull CM, Brook BW, Heard LMB, Fordham DA (2013) Using plant distributions to predict the current and future range of a rare lizard. Diversity and Distributions 19(9), 1125-1137.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dennis EB, Brereton TM, Morgan BJT, Fox R, Shortall CR, Prescott T, Foster S (2019) Trends and indicators for quantifying moth abundance and occupancy in Scotland. Journal of Insect Conservation 23, 369-380.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
QGIS Development Team (2024) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available at http://qgis.osgeo.org
Einoder LD, Southwell DM, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Gillespie GR, Fisher A, Wintle BA (2018) Occupancy and detectability modelling of vertebrates in northern Australia using multiple sampling methods. PLoS ONE 13(9), e0203304.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fellows HL, Fenner AL, Bull CM (2009) Spiders provide important resources for an endangered lizard. Journal of Zoology 279(2), 156-163.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fenner AL, Bull CM (2011) Central-place territorial defence in a burrow-dwelling skink: aggressive responses to conspecific models in pygmy bluetongue lizards. Journal of Zoology 283(1), 45-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Field SA, Tyre AJ, Possingham HP (2005) Optimizing allocation of monitoring effort under economic and observational constraints. Journal of Wildlife Management 69(2), 473-482.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fisher RA (1970) ‘Statistical methods for research workers.’ (Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh, UK) 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_6
Fitzpatrick MC, Preisser EL, Ellison AM, Elkinton JS (2009) Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations. Ecological Applications 19(7), 1673-1679.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Fordham DA, Watts MJ, Delean S, Brook BW, Heard LMB, Bull CM (2012) Managed relocation as an adaptation strategy for mitigating climate change threats to the persistence of an endangered lizard. Global Change Biology 18(9), 2743-2755.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Garel M, Cugnasse J-M, Gaillard J-M, Loison A, Santosa Y, Maublanc M-L (2005) Effect of observer experience on the monitoring of a mouflon population. Acta Theriologica 50, 109-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Geyle HM, Guillera-Arroita G, Davies HF, Firth RSC, Murphy BP, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Woinarski JCZ, Nicholson E (2019) Towards meaningful monitoring: a case study of a threatened rodent. Austral Ecology 44(2), 223-236.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Griffen BD, Drake JM (2008) A review of extinction in experimental populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 77(6), 1274-1287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Legg CJ, Nagy L (2006) Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. Journal of Environmental Management 78(2), 194-199.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Legge S, Woinarski JCZ, Burbidge AA, Palmer R, Ringma J, Radford JQ, Mitchell N, Bode M, Wintle B, Baseler M, Bentley J, Copley P, Dexter N, Dickman CR, Gillespie GR, Hill B, Johnson CN, Latch P, Letnic M, Manning A, McCreless EE, Menkhorst P, Morris K, Moseby K, Page M, Pannell D, Tuft K (2018) Havens for threatened Australian mammals: the contributions of fenced areas and offshore islands to the protection of mammal species susceptible to introduced predators. Wildlife Research 45(7), 627-644.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lindenmayer DB, Piggott MP, Wintle BA (2013) Counting the books while the library burns: why conservation monitoring programs need a plan for action. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11(10), 549-555.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Magoulick KM, Hull V, Liu J (2024) Mammal recovery inside and outside terrestrial protected areas. Ambio 53, 1296-1306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2008) Current trends in plant and animal population monitoring. Conservation Biology 22(3), 647-655.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Martin TG, Nally S, Burbidge AA, Arnall S, Garnett ST, Hayward MW, Lumsden LF, Menkhorst P, McDonald-Madden E, Possingham HP (2012) Acting fast helps avoid extinction. Conservation Letters 5(4), 274-280.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mazerolle MJ, Bailey LL, Kendall WL, Andrew Royle J, Converse SJ, Nichols JD (2007) Making great leaps forward: accounting for detectability in herpetological field studies. Journal of Herpetology 41(4), 672-689.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meiri S, Chapple DG (2016) Biases in the current knowledge of threat status in lizards, and bridging the ‘assessment gap’. Biological Conservation 204, 6-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Midway S, Robertson M, Flinn S, Kaller M (2020) Comparing multiple comparisons: practical guidance for choosing the best multiple comparisons test. PeerJ 8, e10387.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Milne T, Bull CM (2000) Burrow choice by individuals of different sizes in the endangered pygmy blue tongue lizard Tiliqua adelaidensis. Biological Conservation 95(3), 295-301.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Milne T, Bull CM, Hutchinson MN (2003) Use of burrows by the endangered pygmy blue-tongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis (Scincidae). Wildlife Research 30(5), 523-528.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moore HA, Dunlop JA, Geyle HM, Greenwood L, Nimmo DG (2023) First you get the money, then you get the power: comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator. Conservation Science and Practice 5(2), e12881.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moyer-Horner L, Smith MM, Belt J (2012) Citizen science and observer variability during American pika surveys. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76(7), 1472-1479.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Murtaugh PA (2014) In defense of P values. Ecology 95(3), 611-617.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Newman C, Buesching CD, Macdonald DW (2003) Validating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation – ‘Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?’. Biological Conservation 113(2), 189-197.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nielsen TP, Bull CM (2020) Effects of grazing regime on the relative body mass of the endangered pygmy bluetongue lizard (Tiliqua adelaidensis). Austral Ecology 45(4), 460-467.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Owens G, Gracanin A, Potts J, Young CM, Heinsohn R, Gibbons P, Stojanovic D (2024) Detection and density estimation for a cryptic species. Austral Ecology 49(2), e13467.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pimm SL, Jones HL, Diamond J (1988) On the risk of extinction. The American Naturalist 132(6), 757-785.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/
Reynolds JH, Thompson WL, Russell B (2011) Planning for success: identifying effective and efficient survey designs for monitoring. Biological Conservation 144(5), 1278-1284.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Robinson NM, Scheele BC, Legge S, Southwell DM, Carter O, Lintermans M, Radford JQ, Skroblin A, Dickman CR, Koleck J, Wayne AF, Kanowski J, Gillespie GR, Lindenmayer DB (2018) How to ensure threatened species monitoring leads to threatened species conservation. Ecological Management & Restoration 19(3), 222-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
RStudio Team (2024) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA. Available at http://www.posit.co/
Scheele BC, Legge S, Blanchard W, Garnett S, Geyle H, Gillespie G, Harrison P, Lindenmayer D, Lintermans M, Robinson N, Woinarski J (2019) Continental-scale assessment reveals inadequate monitoring for threatened vertebrates in a megadiverse country. Biological Conservation 235, 273-278.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schmeller DS, Henry PY, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F, Lengyel S, Nowicki P, Deri E, Budrys E, Kull T, Tali K, Bauch B, Settele J, van swaay C, Kobler A, Babij V, Papastergiadou E, Henle K (2009) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology 23(2), 307-316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Souter NJ, Michael Bull C, Hutchinson MN (2004) Adding burrows to enhance a population of the endangered pygmy blue tongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis. Biological Conservation 116(3), 403-408.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Walls SC (2018) Coping with constraints: achieving effective conservation with limited resources. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6, 24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wotherspoon L, de Oliveira Caetano GH, Roll U, Meiri S, Pili A, Tingley R, Chapple DG (2024) Inferring the extinction risk of Data Deficient and Not Evaluated Australian squamates. Austral Ecology 49(2), e13485.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
