Plastic and unpredictable responses of stream invertebrates to leaf pack patches across sandy-bottomed streams
Barbara J. Downes A C , Jill Lancaster B , Robin Hale A B , Alena Glaister A and William D. Bovill A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Resource Management & Geography, 221 Bouverie St., The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: barbarad@unimelb.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 62(4) 394-403 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF10314
Submitted: 12 December 2010 Accepted: 23 February 2011 Published: 28 April 2011
Abstract
Detrital inputs to ecosystems provide potential food sources and can produce trophic cascades, but this effect is influenced by whether species specialise in consuming or inhabiting accumulations of detritus. To test whether species are differentially associated with leaves or sand, we compared densities of stream invertebrate species in patches of leaves and bare sand in two sandy-bed creeks in south-eastern Australia, in summer and spring. We also assessed the quality of information on diet and substrate association in the literature. Most species showed no density differences between leaf and sand patches (‘microhabitat generalists’), but categorisation as generalists, leaf or sand species differed between datasets. We developed a method for identifying important effect sizes; power analyses showed that many species were true generalists, but many non-significant results were potentially Type II errors. The literature provided information that was broadly consistent with our data, but few studies publish reliable information about either diet or patch use. Our results support a contention that few Australian stream invertebrates are obligate shredders, and this may also be true for streams elsewhere. Predicting and detecting the responses of such generalist taxa to detrital inputs will be very challenging.
Additional keywords: detritus, effect size, functional feeding group, riparian zone, sand-bed streams, trophic subsidy.
References
Abós, C. P., Lepori, F., Mckie, B. G., and Malmqvist, B. (2006). Aggregation among resource patches can promote coexistence in stream-living shredders. Freshwater Biology 51, 545–553.| Aggregation among resource patches can promote coexistence in stream-living shredders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Callaway, D. S., and Hastings, A. (2002). Consumer movement through differentially subsidized habitats creates a spatial food web with unexpected results. Ecology Letters 5, 329–332.
| Consumer movement through differentially subsidized habitats creates a spatial food web with unexpected results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chaloner, D. T., Wipfli, M. S., and Caouette, J. P. (2002). Mass loss and macroinvertebrate colonisation of Pacific salmon carcasses in south-eastern Alaskan streams. Freshwater Biology 47, 263–273.
| Mass loss and macroinvertebrate colonisation of Pacific salmon carcasses in south-eastern Alaskan streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cohen, J. (1988). ‘Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.’ (L. Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale.)
Conn, B. J. (1993). Natural regions and vegetation of Victoria. In ‘Flora of Victoria, Vol. 1, Introduction’. (Eds D. B. Foreman and N. G. Walsh.) pp. 79–158. (Butterworth-Heinemann: Melbourne.)
Cummins, K. W. (1973). Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annual Review of Entomology 18, 183–206.
| Trophic relations of aquatic insects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davis, J., and Finlayson, B. L. (2000). Sand slugs and stream degradation: the case of the Granite Creeks, north-east Victoria. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Technical report 7/2000, Canberra, Australia.
Dobson, M. (1994). Microhabitat as a determinant of diversity: stream invertebrates colonizing leaf packs. Freshwater Biology 32, 565–572.
| Microhabitat as a determinant of diversity: stream invertebrates colonizing leaf packs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dobson, M., and Hildrew, A. G. (1992). A test of resource limitation among shredding detritivores in low order streams in southern England. Journal of Animal Ecology 61, 69–77.
| A test of resource limitation among shredding detritivores in low order streams in southern England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Downes, B. J. (2010). Back to the future: little-used tools and principles of scientific inference can help disentangle effects of multiple stressors on freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 55, 60–79.
| Back to the future: little-used tools and principles of scientific inference can help disentangle effects of multiple stressors on freshwater ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Downes, B. J., Barmuta, L. A., Fairweather, P. G., Faith, D. P., Keough, M. J., et al. (2002). ‘Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Downes, B. J., Lake, P. S., Glaister, A., and Bond, N. (2006). Effects of sand sedimentation on macroinvertebrates of lowland creeks: are the effects consistent? Freshwater Biology 51, 144–160.
| Effects of sand sedimentation on macroinvertebrates of lowland creeks: are the effects consistent?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39, 175–191.
| G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17695343PubMed |
Gessner, M. O., Swan, C. M., Dang, C. K., McKie, B. G., Bardgett, R. D., et al. (2010). Diversity meets decomposition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 372–380.
| Diversity meets decomposition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Graça, M. A. S. (2001). The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in streams – a review. International Review of Hydrobiology 86, 383–393.
| The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in streams – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
King, J. M., Henshall-Howard, M. P., Day, J. A., and Davies, B. R. (1987). Leaf-pack dynamics in a southern African mountain stream. Freshwater Biology 18, 325–340.
| Leaf-pack dynamics in a southern African mountain stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirk, R. E. (1995). ‘Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.’ (Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.: Pacific Grove.)
Kobayashi, S., and Kagaya, T. (2004). Litter patch types determine macroinvertebrate assemblages in pools of a Japanese headwater stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23, 78–89.
| Litter patch types determine macroinvertebrate assemblages in pools of a Japanese headwater stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Krebs, C. J. (1989). ‘Ecological Methodology.’ (Harper & Row: New York.)
Laasonen, P., Muotka, T., and Kivijärvi, I. (1998). Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8, 101–113.
| Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lake, P. S. (1995). Of floods and droughts: river and stream ecosystems of Australia. In ‘River and Stream Ecosystems of the World’. (Eds C. E. Cushing, K. W. Cummins and G. W. Minshall.) pp. 659–694. (University of California Press: Berkeley.)
Lancaster, J., Bradley, D. C., Hogan, A., and Waldron, S. (2005). Intraguild omnivory in predatory stream insects. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 619–629.
| Intraguild omnivory in predatory stream insects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lancaster, J., Downes, B. J., and Glaister, A. (2009). Interacting environmental gradients, trade-offs and reversals in the abundance–environment relationships of stream insects: when flow is unimportant. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 259–270.
| Interacting environmental gradients, trade-offs and reversals in the abundance–environment relationships of stream insects: when flow is unimportant.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjslWku7c%3D&md5=59ead6ce9d61546a3523af4fb30e2129CAS |
Ledger, M. E., and Hildrew, A. G. (2000). Herbivory in an acid stream. Freshwater Biology 43, 545–556.
Leroux, S. J., and Loreau, M. (2008). Subsidy hypothesis and strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems. Ecology Letters 11, 1147–1156.
| 18713270PubMed |
Linklater, W., and Winterbourn, M. J. (1993). Life histories and production of two trichopteran shredders in New Zealand streams with different riparian vegetation. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 27, 61–70.
| Life histories and production of two trichopteran shredders in New Zealand streams with different riparian vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Malmqvist, B., Sjostrom, P., and Frick, K. (1991). The diet of two species of Isoperla (Plecoptera : Perlodidae) in relation to season, site, and sympatry. Hydrobiologia 213, 191–203.
| The diet of two species of Isoperla (Plecoptera : Perlodidae) in relation to season, site, and sympatry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marchant, R. (1989). A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebrates. Bulletin of the Australian Society for Limnology 12, 49–52.
McKie, B., and Cranston, P. S. (2001). Colonisation of experimentally immersed wood in south eastern Australia: responses of feeding groups to changes in riparian vegetation. Hydrobiologia 452, 1–14.
| Colonisation of experimentally immersed wood in south eastern Australia: responses of feeding groups to changes in riparian vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mihuc, T. B. (1997). The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategies. Freshwater Biology 37, 455–462.
| The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mihuc, T. B., and Mihuc, J. R. (1995). Trophic ecology of five shredders in a Rocky Mountain stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10, 209–216.
| Trophic ecology of five shredders in a Rocky Mountain stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, C. (2003). ‘Big dry’ down under. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1, 61.
| ‘Big dry’ down under.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moore, J. C., Berlow, E. L., Coleman, D. C., de Ruiter, P. C., Dong, Q., et al. (2004). Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecology Letters 7, 584–600.
| Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palmer, M. A., Swan, C. M., Nelson, K., Silver, P., and Alvestad, R. (2000). Streambed landscapes: evidence that stream invertebrates respond to the type and spatial arrangement of patches. Landscape Ecology 15, 563–576.
| Streambed landscapes: evidence that stream invertebrates respond to the type and spatial arrangement of patches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pretty, J. L., and Dobson, M. (2004). The response of macroinvertebrates to artificially enhanced detritus levels in plantation streams. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8, 550–559.
| The response of macroinvertebrates to artificially enhanced detritus levels in plantation streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pretty, J. L., Giberson, D. J., and Dobson, M. (2005). Resource dynamics and detritivore production in an acid stream. Freshwater Biology 50, 578–591.
| Resource dynamics and detritivore production in an acid stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Quinn, G. P., and Keough, M. J. (2002). ‘Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
R Development Core Team (2010). ‘R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.)
Read, M. G., and Barmuta, L. A. (1999). Comparisons of benthic communities adjacent to riparian native eucalypt and introduced willow vegetation. Freshwater Biology 42, 359–374.
| Comparisons of benthic communities adjacent to riparian native eucalypt and introduced willow vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid, D. J., Lake, P. S., Quinn, G. P., and Reich, P. (2008). Association of reduced riparian vegetation cover in agricultural landscapes with coarse detritus dynamics in lowland streams. Marine and Freshwater Research 59, 998–1014.
| Association of reduced riparian vegetation cover in agricultural landscapes with coarse detritus dynamics in lowland streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid, D. J., Quinn, G. P., Lake, P. S., and Reich, P. (2008). Terrestrial detritus supports the food webs in lowland intermittent streams of south-eastern Australia: a stable isotope study. Freshwater Biology 53, 2036–2050.
| Terrestrial detritus supports the food webs in lowland intermittent streams of south-eastern Australia: a stable isotope study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson, J. S. (1991). Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream: an experimental test. Ecology 72, 873–887.
| Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream: an experimental test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson, J. S., Zhang, Y., and Marczak, L. B. (2010). Resource subsidies across the land-freshwater interface and responses in recipient communities. River Research and Applications 26, 55–66.
| Resource subsidies across the land-freshwater interface and responses in recipient communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
