CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Marine & Freshwater Research   
Marine & Freshwater Research
Journal Banner
  Advances in the Aquatic Sciences
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Referee Guidelines
Early Career Referee Mentoring
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 61(11)

Does sampling method or microhabitat type determine patterns of macroinvertebrate assemblage structure detected across spatial scales in rivers?

M. L. Giri A, E. T. Chester A, B. J. Robson A B

A School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Vic. 3280, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: Belinda.robson@deakin.edu.au
 
PDF (174 KB) $25
 Supplementary Material
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblage structure detected across spatial scales in rivers vary among studies, and it is not clear whether methodological differences in sampling methods or differences between rivers are responsible. We aimed to separate the roles of microhabitats and sampling methods in determining patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages across spatial scales in the Johanna River, south-eastern Australia. We hypothesised that less sample-to-sample variability in the structure of macroinvertebrate assemblages would be detected using a Sürber sampler than by scrubbing stones. However, Sürber samples were more variable than individual stones, although invertebrate abundance did not differ. To examine the effect of habitat and substratum, we hypothesised that taxa richness, invertebrate abundance and sample variability would differ among leaf packs and stones. Variation among samples in taxa richness and abundance was higher among leaf packs than among cobbles, whereas variability in taxon composition was much higher among stones. Leaf packs in runs had four times as many taxa as did stones in riffles, and more individuals. Leaf packs may therefore provide a more representative sample of the assemblage than do stones. Sürber samplers may randomly subsample riffle assemblages, inflating the sample-to-sample variability detected.

Keywords: leaf litter, riffles, runs, spatial variation, Sürber samples, taxa richness.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014