Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of shrub height for fuel-type mapping combining airborne LiDAR and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging

David Riaño A B F , Emilio Chuvieco A , Susan L. Ustin B , Javier Salas A , José R. Rodríguez-Pérez C , Luis M. Ribeiro D , Domingos X. Viegas D , José M. Moreno E and Helena Fernández E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Geografía, Universidad de Alcalá, Colegios 2, E-28801 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

B Center for Spatial Technologies and Remote Sensing (CSTARS), University of California, Davis, 250-N, The Barn, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8617, USA.

C Área de Ingeniera Cartográfica, Geodésica y Fotogrametría, Universidad de León, Avenida de Astorga, s/n, E-24400 Ponferrada, León, Spain.

D Centro de Estudios sobre Incêndios Florestais, Coimbra, Portugal.

E U. Castilla la Mancha, Toledo, Spain.

F Corresponding author. Email: driano@cstars.ucdavis.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(3) 341-348 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06003
Submitted: 6 January 2006  Accepted: 24 January 2007   Published: 3 July 2007

Abstract

A fuel-type map of a predominantly shrub-land area in central Portugal was generated for a fire research experimental site, by combining airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR), and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging. Since the vegetation canopy and the ground are too close together to be easily discerned by LiDAR pulses, standard methods of processing LiDAR data did not provide an accurate estimate of shrub height. It was demonstrated that the standard process to generate the digital ground model (DGM) sometimes contained height values for the top of the shrub canopy rather than from the ground. Improvement of the DGM was based on separating canopy from ground hits using color infrared ortho imaging to detect shrub cover, which was measured simultaneously with the LiDAR data. Potentially erroneous data in the DGM was identified using two criteria: low vegetation height and high Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a commonly used spectral index to identify vegetated areas. Based on the height of surrounding pixels, a second interpolation of the DGM was performed to extract those erroneously identified as ground in the standard method. The estimation of the shrub height improved significantly after this correction, and increased determination coefficients from R2 = 0.48 to 0.65. However, the estimated shrub heights were still less than those observed in the field.

Additional keywords: color infrared ortho image, fuel types, LiDAR, shrub height.


Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the EC project ‘Forest Fire Spread and Mitigation (SPREAD), EC-Contract Nr. EVG1-CT-2001-00027. The Ministry of Science and Technology ‘Ramón y Cajal’ Program supported David Riaño. Thanks to Keir Keightley and Marco Trombetti for reviewing this manuscript. Linguistic assistance from Julia Marcia Medina is also acknowledged.


References


Albini FA (1976) ‘Estimating wildfire behavior and effects.’ USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, INT-30. (Ogden, UT)

Allgöwer B, Benvenuti M, Bowyer P, Camia A, Chuvieco E, Danson M, Giakoumakis M, Gitas I, Morsdorf F, Riaño D, Viegas DX, Vanha-majamaa I (2003) ‘Methods to map fuel types from remotely sensed data.’ Deliverable 111. SPREAD PROJECT. EVG1-CT-2001–00043.

Anderson HE (1982) ‘Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior.’ USDA, Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-122. (Ogden, UT)

Baltsavias EP (1999a) Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing  54, 199–214.

Crossref | Chuvieco E, Riaño D, Van Wagtendonk JW, Morsdorf F (2003) Fuel loads and fuel types. In ‘Wildland Fire Danger Estimation And Mapping. The Role of Remote Sensing Data’. (Ed. E Chuvieco) pp. 1–32. (World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd.)

Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1978) ‘The National Fire-Danger Rating System – 1978.’ USDA Forest Service, GTR INT-39. (Ogden, UT)

Finney MA (1998) ‘FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – Model development and evaluation.’ USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Gaveau DLA , Hill RA (2003) Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing  29, 650–657.
Merrill DF, Alexander ME (1987) ‘Glossary of forest fire management terms.’ National Research Council of Canada, Committee for Forest Fire Management. (Ottawa, ON)

Morsdorf F, Meier E, Kotz B, Itten KI, Dobbertin M , Allgower B (2004) LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management. Remote Sensing of Environment  92, 353–362.

Crossref | Viegas DX, Cruz MG, Ribeiro LM, Silva AJ, Ollero A, Arrue B, Dios R, Gómez-Rodríguez F, Merino L, Miranda AI, Santos P (2002) Gestosa fire spread experiments. In ‘Forest Fire Research & Wildland Fire Safety’. (Ed. DX Viegas) (Millpress: Rotterdam, Netherlands)

von Hansen W , Vögtle T (1999) Extraktion der Geländeoberfläche aus flugzeuggetragenen Laserscanner-Aufnahmen. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation  4, 229–236.


Wehr A , Lohr U (1999) Airborne laser scanning – an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing  54, 68–82.

Crossref |

Weltz MA, Ritchie JC , Fox HD (1994) Comparison of Laser and Field-Measurements of Vegetation Height and Canopy Cover. Water Resources Research  30, 1311–1319.

Crossref |