Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Heterogeneity of lifetime reproductive performance, its components and associations with wool production and liveweight of Merino ewes

G. J. Lee A B , K. D. Atkins A and M. A. Sladek A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: greg.lee@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Animal Production Science 49(7) 624-629 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09013
Submitted: 19 January 2009  Accepted: 12 March 2009   Published: 11 June 2009

Abstract

The heterogeneity in lifetime (2–6 years of age) reproductive performance within three research flocks maintained at the Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, in central-western New South Wales, was used to establish the potential to improve flock reproductive performance by identifying performance segments for either selection or for differential management. The data comprised a total of 32 716 records from 7322 ewes, collected over the period from 1977 to 2003. Within each of the flocks, there were large differences (P < 0.001) in lifetime net reproduction rate, and each of its components (fertility, fecundity and lamb survival), between each of the net reproduction rate quartiles. The difference in net reproduction between the ewes in the top quartile and those in the bottom quartile was equivalent to an additional lamb per ewe annually. These differences in reproduction rate between the quartiles were not related to pre-joining liveweight or condition score. Higher reproductive rates were associated with a cost to clean fleece weight, although the estimated effects on fibre diameter were small. Opportunities to use this variation to improve reproduction rates are discussed and include retaining high-performing ewes longer in the breeding flock, removing poor performers and targeting management interventions towards ewes that will yield the largest responses.

Additional keywords: current generation, reproduction costs, reproductive performance.


Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the many staff members of the Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, who assisted with data collection and database management. Support for the D-flock and QPLU$ data collection projects was provided by Australian woolgrowers through Australian Wool Innovation and its predecessors, while the study reported was supported by the Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation.


References


ABARE (2008) Farm survey data for the beef, slaughter lambs and sheep industries. Available at http://www.abare.gov.au/ame/mla/mla.asp [Verified 14 October 2008]

Behrendt R, Barber P, Oldham CM, Hocking Edwards JE, Hatcher S, Thompson A (2006a) Lifetime Wool: comparisons on commercial farms show the benefit of good nutrition in pregnancy on production and lamb performance of Merino ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 26, Communication 70. [Verified 1 December 2008]

Young JM (2008) Implications of Lifetimewool for on-farm management on the southern slopes (southern NSW & central Vic). Available at http://www.lifetimewool.com.au/pdf/MIDASsouthernslopes.pdf [Verified 1 December 2008]