Increasing the energy content of lactation diets fed to first-litter sows reduces weight loss and improves productivity over two parities
R. J. Smits A C , D. J. Henman A and R. H. King BA Rivalea Australia Pty Ltd, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia.
B RHK Consulting Pty Ltd, 30 Hedderwick Street, Essendon, Vic. 3040, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: rsmits@rivalea.com.au
Animal Production Science 53(1) 23-29 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11362
Submitted: 21 December 2011 Accepted: 13 June 2012 Published: 16 October 2012
Abstract
In an experiment designed to evaluate the lactation and reproductive response to increasing energy in lactation, 288 pregnant nulliparous sows were allocated to diets formulated to contain: 13.0, 13.6, 14.2, 14.7 or 15.3 MJ digestible energy (DE)/kg of diet fed. Sows commenced their dietary regimen at 109.6 ± 0.1 days of gestation. Sows were fed 3 kg/day of their treatment diet before farrowing, then diets were offered ad libitum until weaning at 26.9 ± 0.1 days. Sows were fed a commercial diet postweaning until mating and throughout their subsequent gestation. There was no effect of dietary energy level on first-litter size born (10.5 ± 0.1 liveborn) or average piglet birthweight (1.44 ± 0.01 kg). Sow ad libitum feed intake during lactation was also unaffected by dietary energy level. There was no linear or quadratic response to dietary energy level on litter gain during lactation (1.79 ± 0.03 kg/day). Consequently sows lost weight during lactation in an inverse linear response to dietary energy level (P < 0.001) and sow weaning weight and backfat P2 increased with energy level (181 kg and 16.1 mm at 13.1 MJ DE/kg versus 191 kg and 17.2 mm at 15.3 MJ DE/kg, respectively, P < 0.05). The proportion of sows staying in the herd until their second litter and the cumulative litter size over two parities was maximised when sows were fed a lactation diet containing at least 14.2 MJ DE/kg (P < 0.05). Increasing the dietary energy content of lactation diets resulted in an improvement in sow productivity over their early parities, but did not increase lactation performance.
References
Aherne FX, Kirkwood RN (1985) Nutrition and sow prolificacy. Journal of Fertility 33, 169–183.Aherne FX, Williams IH (1992) Nutrition for optimizing breeding herd performance. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice 8, 589–608.
Close WH, Cole DJA (2000) ‘Nutrition of sows and boars.’ (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham)
Coffey MT, Diggs BG, Handlin DL, Knabe DA, Maxwell CV, Noland PR, Prince TJ, Gromwell GL (1994) Effects of dietary energy during gestation and lactation on reproductive performance of sows: a cooperative study. Journal of Animal Science 72, 4–9.
Hughes PE, Smits RJ (2002) Breeding herd feeding strategies to optimise reproductive efficiency and reduce culling rates. Australian Pork Limited, Final Report No. 1611, Canberra.
Hughes PE, Varley MA (2003) Lifetime performance of the sow. In ‘Perspectives in pig science’. Nottingham. (Eds J Wiseman, MA Varley, B Kemp) pp. 333–355. (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham)
Hughes PE, Smits RJ, Xie Y, Kirkwood RN (2010) Relationships among gilt and sow live weight, P2 backfat depth and culling rates. Journal of Swine Health and Production 18, 301–305.
Johnston LJ, Orr DE, Tribble LF, Clark JR (1986) Effect of lactation and rebreeding phase energy intake on primiparous and multiparous sow performance. Journal of Animal Science 63, 804–814.
Jones RM, Hermesch S (2007) Season and parity effects on the feed intake of lactating sows in an Australian commercial piggery. In ‘Manipulating Pig Production XI’. (Eds JE Paterson, JA Barker) p. 36. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Canberra)
Kim SW, Hurley WL, Han IK, Stein HH, Easter RA (1999) Effect of nutrient intake on mammary gland growth in lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3304–3315.
King RH (1987) Nutritional anoestrus in young sows. Pig News and Information 8, 15–22.
King RH, Williams IH (1984) The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 2. Protein and energy intakes during lactation. Animal Production 38, 249–256.
| The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 2. Protein and energy intakes during lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXkvV2nsb0%3D&md5=da823f9ab2bb0951c7ad8b92d058686aCAS |
Kirkwood RN, Baidoo SK, Aherne FX, Sather AP (1987) The influence of feeding level during lactation on the occurrence and endocrinology of the postweaning estrus in sows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67, 405–415.
| The influence of feeding level during lactation on the occurrence and endocrinology of the postweaning estrus in sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkwood RN, Mitaru BN, Gooneratne AD, Blair R, Thacker PA (1988) The influence of dietary energy intake during successive lactations on sow prolificacy. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68, 283–290.
| The influence of dietary energy intake during successive lactations on sow prolificacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Levis DG (2005) Biological and economical evaluation of sow longevity. In ‘Manipulating Pig Production X’. (Ed. JE Paterson) pp. 171–179. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Canberra)
Lucia TJ, Dial GD, Marsh WE (2000) Lifetime reproductive and financial performance of female swine. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 216, 1802–1809.
| Lifetime reproductive and financial performance of female swine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGlone JJ, Stansbury WF, Tribble LF (1988) Management of lactating sows during heat stress: effects of water drip, snout coolers, floor type and a high energy-density diet. Journal of Animal Science 66, 885–891.
NHMRC (2004) ‘Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.’ (National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government: Canberra)
Noblet J, Etienne M (1986) Effect of energy level in lactating sows on yield and composition of milk and nutrient balance of piglets. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1888–1896.
NRC (1998) ‘Nutrient requirements of swine.’ (National Research Council, National Academy Press: Washington, DC)
O’Grady JF, Lynch PB (1978) Voluntary food intake by lactating sows: influence of system of feeding and nutrient density of the diet Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 127–135.
PigCheck (2007) ‘PigCheck.’ (Australian Pork Limited: Canberra)
Pluske JR, Williams IH, Zak LJ, Clowes EJ, Cegielski AC, Aherne FX (1998) Feeding lactating primiparous sows to establish three divergent metabolic states: III. Milk production and piglet growth. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1165–1171.
Quiniou N, Noblet J (1999) Influence of high ambient temperatures on performance of multiparous lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2124–2134.
Rosero DS, van Heugten E, Odle J, Arellano C, Boyd RD (2012) Response of the modern lactating sow to progeny to source and level of supplemental dietary fat during high ambient temperatures Journal of Animal Science in press.
Sterning M, Rydhmer L, Eliasson L, Einarsson S, Andersson K (1990) A study on primiparous sows of the ability to show standing oestrus and to ovulate after weaning. Influences of loss of body weight and backfat during lactation and of litter size, litter weight gain and season. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 31, 227–236.
Thaker MYC, Bilkei G (2005) Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Animal Reproduction Science 88, 309–318.
| Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvnsVWltA%3D%3D&md5=dfef44a8b59547f5451a5fd4dd709279CAS |
Tilton SL, Miller PS, Lewis AJ, Reese DE, Ermer PM (1999) Addition of fat to the diets of lactating sows: I. Effects on milk production and composition and carcass composition of the litter at weaning. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2491–2500.
Tokach MD, Pettigrew JE, Crooker BA, Dial GD, Sower AF (1992) Quantitative influence of lysine and energy intake on milk yield of milk components in the primiparous sow. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1864–1872.
Tritton SJ, King RH, Campbell RG, Edwards AC, Hughes PE (1996) The effects of dietary protein and energy levels of diets offered during lactation on the lactational and subsequent reproductive performance of first-litter sows. Animal Science 62, 573–579.
| The effects of dietary protein and energy levels of diets offered during lactation on the lactational and subsequent reproductive performance of first-litter sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XlsV2qtLk%3D&md5=9ac59513e8599ea4d709723133158315CAS |
van den Brand H, Soede NM, Kemp B (2000) Dietary energy source at two feeding levels during lactation of primiparous sows: II. Effects on periestrus hormone profiles and embryonic survival. Journal of Animal Science 78, 405–411.
Zak LJ, Williams IH, Foxcroft GR, Pluske JR, Cegielski AC, Clowes EJ, Aherne FX (1998) Feeding lactating primiparous sows to establish three divergent metabolic states: I. Associated endocrine changes and postweaning reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1145–1153.
