Bayesian analysis of energy balance data from growing cattle using parametric and non-parametric modellingL. E. Moraes A , E. Kebreab A , A. B. Strathe B , J. France C , J. Dijkstra D , D. P. Casper E and J. G. Fadel A F
A Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
B Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
C Centre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph N1G 2W1, ON, Canada.
D Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
E Dairy Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
F Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Animal Production Science 54(12) 2068-2081 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14535
Submitted: 1 May 2014 Accepted: 24 July 2014 Published: 20 October 2014
Linear and non-linear models have been extensively utilised for the estimation of net and metabolisable energy requirements and for the estimation of the efficiencies of utilising dietary energy for maintenance and tissue gain. In growing animals, biological principles imply that energy retention rate is non-linearly related to the energy intake level because successive increments in energy intake above maintenance result in diminishing returns for tissue energy accretion. Heat production in growing cattle has been traditionally described by logarithmic regression and exponential models. The objective of the present study was to develop Bayesian models of energy retention and heat production in growing cattle using parametric and non-parametric techniques. Parametric models were used to represent models traditionally employed to describe energy use in growing steers and heifers whereas the non-parametric approach was introduced to describe energy utilisation while accounting for non-linearities without specifying a particular functional form. The Bayesian framework was used to incorporate prior knowledge of bioenergetics on tissue retention and heat production and to estimate net and metabolisable energy requirements (NEM and MEM, respectively), and the partial efficiencies of utilising dietary metabolisable energy for maintenance (km) and tissue energy gain (kg). The database used for the study consisted of 719 records of indirect calorimetry on steers and non-pregnant, non-lactating heifers. The NEM was substantially larger in energy retention models (ranged from 0.40 to 0.50 MJ/kg BW0.75.day) than were NEM estimates from heat-production models (ranged from 0.29 to 0.49 MJ/kg BW0.75.day). Similarly, km was also larger in energy retention models than in heat production models. These differences are explained by the nature of y-intercepts (NEM) in these two models. Energy retention models estimate fasting catabolism as the y-intercept, while heat production models estimate fasting heat production. Conversely, MEM was virtually identical in all models and approximately equal to 0.53 MJ/kg BW0.75.day in this database.
Additional keywords: energy retention, heat production, maintenance.
ReferencesAgricultural and Food Research Council (1993) ‘Energy and protein requirements of ruminants.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Agricultural Research Council (1980) ‘The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock.’ (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Slough, UK)
Baldwin RL (1995) ‘Modeling ruminant digestion and metabolism.’ (Chapman and Hall: London)
Best N, Cowles MK, Vines SK (1995) ‘CODA manual version 0.30.’ (MRC Biostatistics Unit: Cambridge, UK)
Blaxter KL (1980) The efficiency of energy utilisation by beef cattle. Annales de Zootechnie 29, 145–159.
| The efficiency of energy utilisation by beef cattle.CrossRef |
Blaxter KL, Boyne AW (1978) The estimation of the nutritive value of feeds as energy sources for ruminants and the derivation of feeding systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science 90, 47–68.
| The estimation of the nutritive value of feeds as energy sources for ruminants and the derivation of feeding systems.CrossRef |
Cantet RJC, Birchmeier AN, Canaza Cayo AW, Fioretti C (2005) Semiparametric animal models via penalized splines as alternatives to models with contemporary groups. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2482–2494.
Carstens GE, Johnson DE, Johnson KA, Hotovy SK, Szymanski TJ (1989) Genetic variation in energy expenditures of monozygous twin beef cattle at 9 and 20 months of age. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th symposium on energy metabolism on farm animals’. (Eds J van der Honing, WH Close) Publication No. 43. pp. 312–315. (European Association for Animal Production Publication: Wageningen, The Netherlands)
Chiogna M, Gaetan C (2007) Semiparametric zero-inflated Poisson models with application to animal abundance studies. Environmetrics 18, 303–314.
| Semiparametric zero-inflated Poisson models with application to animal abundance studies.CrossRef |
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne)
Crainiceanu CM, Ruppert D, Wand MP (2005) Bayesian analysis for penalized spline regression using WinBUGS. Journal of Statistical Software 14,
Faridi A, Golian A, France J (2012) Evaluating the egg production of broiler breeder hens in response to dietary nutrient intake from 31 to 60 weeks of age through neural network models. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 92, 473–481.
| Evaluating the egg production of broiler breeder hens in response to dietary nutrient intake from 31 to 60 weeks of age through neural network models.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtV2ntbg%3D&md5=af538dad621e835d699e4cd8b3a2411cCAS |
Faridi A, Golian A, Mottaghitalab M, Lopez S, France J (2013) Predicting the metabolizable energy content of corn for ducks: a comparison of support vector regression with other methods. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 1036–1043.
| Predicting the metabolizable energy content of corn for ducks: a comparison of support vector regression with other methods.CrossRef |
Ferrell CL, Jenkins TG (1985) Energy utilization by Hereford and Simmental males and females. Animal Production 41, 53–61.
| Energy utilization by Hereford and Simmental males and females.CrossRef |
Flatt WP, Van Soest PJ, Sykes JF, Moore LA (1958) A description of the Energy Metabolism Laboratory at the US Department of Agriculture Research Center in Beltsville, Maryland. In ‘Proceedings of the 1st symposium on energy metabolism. Vol. 8’. (Eds GA Thorbek, H Aersoe) pp. 53–64. (European Association of Animal Production: Copenhagen, Denmark)
France J, Dhanoa MS, Cammell SB, Gill M, Beever DE, Thornley JHM (1989) On the use of response functions in energy balance analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 140, 83–99.
| On the use of response functions in energy balance analysis.CrossRef |
Frisch JE, Vercoe JE (1977) Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Animal Production 25, 343–358.
| Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle.CrossRef |
Garrett WN (1980) Factors influencing energetic efficiency of beef production. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1434–1440.
Garrett WN, Johnson DE (1983) Nutritional energetics of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 57, 478–497.
Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7, 457–472.
| Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.CrossRef |
Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern H, Rubin D (2004) ‘Bayesian data analysis.’ 2nd edn. Texts in Statistical Science. (Chapman and Hall: London)
Gurrin LC, Scurrah KJ, Hazelton ML (2005) Tutorial in biostatistics: spline smoothing with linear mixed models. Statistics in Medicine 24, 3361–3381.
| Tutorial in biostatistics: spline smoothing with linear mixed models.CrossRef | 16206247PubMed |
Jenkins TG, Ferrell CL (1983) Nutrient requirements to maintain weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows of four diverse breed types. Journal of Animal Science 56, 761–770.
Kebreab E, France J, Agnew RE, Yan T, Dhanoa MS, Dijkstra J, Beever DE, Reynolds CK (2003) Alternatives to linear analysis of energy balance data from lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2904–2913.
| Alternatives to linear analysis of energy balance data from lactating cows.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntV2rt7o%3D&md5=69a05361e4f22daf1e31df96caabc74dCAS | 14507026PubMed |
Lofgreen GP, Garrett WN (1968) A system for expressing net energy requirements and feed values for growing and finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 27, 793–806.
Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10, 325–337.
| WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility.CrossRef |
Marcondes MI, Tedeschi LO, Valadares Filho SC, Gionbelli MP (2013) Predicting efficiency of use of metabolizable energy to net energy for gain and maintenance of Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4887–4898.
| Predicting efficiency of use of metabolizable energy to net energy for gain and maintenance of Nellore cattle.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1SqtLjP&md5=d8aa9d51f8ad85e728be4a54d8955aa3CAS | 23978609PubMed |
Meyer K (2005) Random regression analyses using B-splines to model growth of Australian Angus cattle. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 37, 473–500.
| Random regression analyses using B-splines to model growth of Australian Angus cattle.CrossRef | 16093011PubMed |
Moe PW, Flatt WP, Tyrrell H (1972) Net energy value of feeds for lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 945–958.
| Net energy value of feeds for lactation.CrossRef |
Moraes LE, Wilen JE, Robinson PH, Fadel JG (2012) A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy scenarios. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 1267–1282.
| A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy scenarios.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XjtFWnsrY%3D&md5=3eacef788d6df3b0a594f959db720a17CAS | 22365210PubMed |
Moraes LE, Strathe AB, Fadel JG, Casper DP, Kebreab E (2014) Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle. Global Change Biology 20, 2140–2148.
| Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle.CrossRef | 24259373PubMed |
National Research Council (2000) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th revised edn. (National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC)
Ntzoufras I (2009) ‘Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York)
Old CA, Garrett WN (1985) Efficiency of feed energy utilization for protein and fat gain in Hereford and Charolais steers. Journal of Animal Science 60, 766–771.
Pinheiro J, Bates DM (2000) ‘Mixed effects models in S and SPLUS. Statistics and computing.’ (Springer: New York)
Ruppert D (2002) Selecting the number of knots for penalized splines. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 11, 735–757.
| Selecting the number of knots for penalized splines.CrossRef |
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best N, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 64, 583–639.
| Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion).CrossRef |
Strathe AB, Danfær A, Sørensen H, Kebreab E (2010) A multilevel nonlinear mixed-effects approach to model growth in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 88, 638–649.
| A multilevel nonlinear mixed-effects approach to model growth in pigs.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktVOqtL4%3D&md5=32cb0a0750ee4f2d614c0ba07e45a331CAS | 19855000PubMed |
Strathe AB, Dijkstra J, France J, Lopez S, Yan T, Kebreab E (2011) A Bayesian approach to analyse energy balance data from lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2520–2531.
Tedeschi LO, Boin C, Fox DG, Leme PR, Alleoni GF, Lanna DPD (2002) Energy requirement for maintenance and growth of Nellore bulls and steers fed high-forage diets. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1671–1682.
Tedeschi LO, Fox DG, Guiroy PJ (2004) A decision support system to improve individual cattle management. 1. A mechanistic, dynamic model for animal growth. Agricultural Systems 79, 171–204.
| A decision support system to improve individual cattle management. 1. A mechanistic, dynamic model for animal growth.CrossRef |
Toms JD, Lesperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84, 2034–2041.
| Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds.CrossRef |
Wand MP (2003) Smoothing and mixed models. Computational Statistics 18, 223–249.
Williams CB, Jenkins TG (2003) A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. II. Metabolizable energy utilization for gain. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1382–1389.