Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How do animal performance and methane emissions vary with forage management intensification and supplementation?

J. F. W. Koscheck A , E. P. Romanzini B F , R. P. Barbero C , L. M. Delevatti B , A. C. Ferrari B , J. T. Mulliniks D , C. J. Mousquer E , T. T. Berchielli B and R. A. Reis B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Trouw Nutrition Brasil, 78098-370, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.

B Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Câmpus Jaboticabal, Departamento de Zootecnia, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.

C Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Instituto de Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal, 23897-000, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.

D University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, 69101, North Platte, NE, USA.

E Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso (UFMT), Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, 78060-900, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.

F Corresponding author. Email: elieder.romanzini@gmail.com

Animal Production Science 60(9) 1201-1209 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18712
Submitted: 24 November 2018  Accepted: 7 November 2019   Published: 24 March 2020

Abstract

Context: Yields from Brazilian beef-production systems do not always match the expected potential of a forage-based beef-production system. This efficiency is dependent on adjustments of grazing intensity and supplement utilisation to achieve higher bodyweight gain and lower methane emission. Therefore, more studies are necessary to evaluate the association between pasture management and supplement doses.

Aims: The aim of the present study was to determine nutrient intake, nutrient digestibility, animal performance, carcass characteristics and enteric methane emissions of young Nellore bulls grazing Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu pastures.

Methods: One hundred and forty-eight yearling bulls (230 ± 17 kg) were randomly assigned to a grazing-by-supplementation strategy that was designed to allocate three different sward heights with differing levels of supplementation during the wet season. Treatment combinations were (1) low sward height with high supplementation (LH-HS, 15-cm sward height and supplementation at 0.6% of bodyweight (BW)); (2) low height with moderate supplementation (LH-MS, 15 cm and 0.3% BW); (3) moderate height with moderate supplementation (MH-MS, 25 cm and 0.3% BW); (4) moderate height with low supplementation (MH-LS, 25 cm and 0.1% BW); (5) high height with low supplementation (HH-LS, 35 cm and 0.1% BW); and (6) high height with no supplementation (HH-WS, 35 cm).

Key results: Bulls in the HH groups had a greater herbage intake than did those in the LH groups (P < 0.01). Bulls in the LH-HS treatment resulted in a greater (P < 0.01) carcass average daily gain than that obtained with LH-MS, MH-LS or HH-WS treatment. Higher stocking rate with the LH treatment resulted in greater gains per hectare in terms of both BW and carcass (P < 0.01). Carcass yield was greater for bulls maintained with the LH-HS treatment (54.3% BW). Higher enteric methane emissions were observed from bulls under the HH treatments (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Comparing carcass gains per hectare and low methane emissions, the present study indicated that pasture management towards a low sward height combined with 0.3% or 0.6% BW supplementation can result in a greater nutrient utilisation efficiency of bulls.

Implications: Results provided information to obtain better gains per animals and area, also decreasing methane emission of beef cattle production system.

Additional keywords: beef cattle, carcass, greenhouse gas, tropical pastures.


References

Association of Official Analytical Chemistry (AOAC) (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis of AOAC International.’ 15th edn. (AOAC: Arlington, VA)

Association of Official Analytical Chemistry (AOAC) (1996) ‘Official methods of analysis of AOAC International.’ 16th edn. (AOAC: Arlington, VA)

Barbero RP, Malheiros EB, Araújo TLR, Nave RLG, Mulliniks JT, Berchielli TT, Ruggieri AC, Reis RA (2015) Combining Marandu grass grazing height and supplementation level to optimize growth and productivity of yearling bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 209, 110–118.
Combining Marandu grass grazing height and supplementation level to optimize growth and productivity of yearling bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boland TM, Quinlan C, Pierce KM, Lynch MB, Kenny DA, Kelly AK, Purcell PJ (2013) The effect of pasture pre-grazing herbage mass on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and average daily gain of grazing beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3867–3874.
The effect of pasture pre-grazing herbage mass on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and average daily gain of grazing beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23908161PubMed |

Brower E (1965) Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on energy metabolism’. (Ed. KL Blaxter) pp. 441–443. (Academic Press: London)

Burns JC, Pond KR, Fisher DS (1994) Measurement of forage intake. In ‘Forage quality, evaluation and utilization’. (Ed. GC Fahey Jr) pp. 494–531. (American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Casagrande DR, Azenha MV, Valente ALS, Vieira BR, Moretti MH, Ruggieri AC, Reis RA, Berchielli TT (2011) Canopy characteristics and behavior of Nellore heifers in Brachiaria brizantha pastures under different grazing heights at a continuous stocking rate. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2294–2301.
Canopy characteristics and behavior of Nellore heifers in Brachiaria brizantha pastures under different grazing heights at a continuous stocking rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Casagrande DR, Azenha MV, Vieira BR, Resende FD, Faria MH, Berchielli TT, Ruggieri AC, Reis RA (2013) Performance and carcass quality of feedlot or pasture finished Nellore heifers according to feeding managements in the postweaning phase. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 42, 899–908.
Performance and carcass quality of feedlot or pasture finished Nellore heifers according to feeding managements in the postweaning phase.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Casali AO, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SC, Pereira JC, Henriques LT, Freitas SG, Paulino MF (2008) Influência do tempo de incubação e do tamanho de partículas sobre os teores de compostos indigestíveis em alimentos e fezes bovinas obtidos por procedimento in situ. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 335–342.
Influência do tempo de incubação e do tamanho de partículas sobre os teores de compostos indigestíveis em alimentos e fezes bovinas obtidos por procedimento in situ.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Da Silva SC, Gimenes FMA, Sarmento DOL, Sbrissia AF, Oliveira DE, Hernandez-Garay A, Pires AV (2013) Grazing behaviour, herbage intake and animal performance of beef cattle heifers on marandu palisade grass subjected to intensities of continuous stocking management. The Journal of Agricultural Science 151, 727–739.
Grazing behaviour, herbage intake and animal performance of beef cattle heifers on marandu palisade grass subjected to intensities of continuous stocking management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Detmann E, Valente EEL, Batista ED, Huhtanen P (2014) An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation. Livestock Science 162, 141–153.
An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

dos Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, dos Anjos LHC, de Oliveira VA, de Oliveira JB, Coelho MR, Lumbreras JF, Cunha TJF (2006) ‘Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos.’ 2nd edn. (Embrapa Solos: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) ‘Forage fibre analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agriculture handbook no. 379.’ (Agricultural Research Service, USDA: Washington, DC)

Hodgson J (1990) ‘Grazing management: science into practice.’ (Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, UK)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) Chapter 10. Emissions from livestock and manure management. In ‘2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. v. 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use’. pp. 10.1–10.87. (IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland)

Johnson KA, Huyler M, Weslberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P (1994) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a SF6 tracer technique. Environmental Science & Technology 28, 359–362.
Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a SF6 tracer technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.
Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA) (2000) Instrução Normativa, num. 3 de 17.01.2000. In ‘Technical regulation of methods for humane slaughtering of livestock’. Available at http://www.agricultura.gov.br/animal/produtos+veterinarios/legislacao [Verified 28 January 2016]

Mertens DR (1987) Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. Journal of Animal Science 64, 1548–1558.
Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 3583960PubMed |

Moore JE (1980) Forage crops. In ‘Crop quality, storage, and utilization’. (Ed. CS Hoveland) pp. 61–91. (Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold CJ (2010) Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4, 1024–1036.
Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22444607PubMed |

Mott GO (1960) Grassing pressure and measurement of pastures production. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th international grassland congress’. (Ed. CL Skidmore) pp. 606–661. (IGC: Reading, UK)

Owens FN, Dubeski P, Hanson CF (1993) Factors that alter the growth and development of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3138–3150.
Factors that alter the growth and development of ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8270538PubMed |

Reis RA, Da Silva SC (2006) Consumo de forragens. In ‘Nutrição de ruminantes’. 1st edn. v.1. (Eds TT Berchielli, AV Pires, SG Oliveira) pp. 79–109. (FUNEP: Jaboticabal, Brazil)

Reis RA, Ruggieri AC, Casagrande DR, Páscoa AG (2009) Suplementação da dieta de bovinos de corte como estratégia do manejo das pastagens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 147–159.
Suplementação da dieta de bovinos de corte como estratégia do manejo das pastagens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sainz RD, Bentley BE (1997) Visceral organ mass and cellularity in growth restricted and refed beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1229–1236.
Visceral organ mass and cellularity in growth restricted and refed beef steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9159269PubMed |

Santos MER, Fonseca DM, Silva GP, Pimentel RM, Carvalho VV, Silva SP (2010) Estrutura do pasto de capim braquiária com variação de alturas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 2125–2131.
Estrutura do pasto de capim braquiária com variação de alturas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sbrissia AF, Silva SC (2008) Compensação tamanho/densidade populacional de perfilhos em pastos de capim marandu. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 35–47.
Compensação tamanho/densidade populacional de perfilhos em pastos de capim marandu.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shaw NH, Mannetje‘t L, Jones RM (1987) Pasture measurements. In ‘Measurement of grassland vegetation and animal production’. (Ed. L Mannetje‘t ) pp. 63–95. (CAB International: Berkshire, UK)

Sollenberger LE, Cherney DJR (1995) Evaluating forage production and quality. In ‘Forages, vol. 2: the science of grassland agriculture’. (Eds RF Barnes, DA Miller, CJ Nelson) pp. 97–110. (Wiley-Blackwell: Ames, IA)

Sollenberger LE, Moore JE, Allen VG, Pedreira CGS (2005) Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Science 45, 896–900.
Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.
A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB (1985) ‘Analysis of forages and fibrous foods.’ (Cornell University: Ithaca, NY)

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1660498PubMed |

Vieira BR, Azenha MV, Casagrande DR, Costa DF, Ruggieri AC, Berchielli TT, Reis RA (2017) Ingestive behavior of supplemented Nellore heifers grazing palisade grass pastures managed with different sward heights. Animal Science Journal 88, 696–704.
Ingestive behavior of supplemented Nellore heifers grazing palisade grass pastures managed with different sward heights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27612161PubMed |