Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dietary betaine and ractopamine combine to increase lean tissue deposition in finisher pigs, particularly gilts

F. R. Dunshea A B E , D. J. Cadogan C and G. G. Partridge D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, 600 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia.

B Current address: Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

C Feedworks Pty Ltd, Romsey, Vic. 3434, Australia.

D Danisco Animal Nutrition, Marlborough, Wiltshire SN8 1XN, United Kingdom.

E Corresponding author. Email: fdunshea@unimelb.edu.au

Animal Production Science 49(1) 65-70 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08014
Submitted: 6 January 2008  Accepted: 10 September 2008   Published: 5 January 2009

Abstract

Dietary ractopamine increases lean tissue deposition, with the responses most evident at ad libitum feed intakes whereas dietary betaine can improve growth by reducing maintenance requirements, with the greatest responses occurring when energy is limiting. This study was conducted to investigate the interactions between dietary ractopamine and betaine on growth and carcass characteristics in restrictively fed [31.0 MJ digestible energy (DE)/day for 14 days followed by 36.8 MJ DE/day for 21 days] boars and gilts. Forty individually penned pigs (58.4 kg) were allocated to a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments, with the respective factors being sex (gilt or boar), dietary betaine (0 and 1.5 g/kg betaine) and dietary ractopamine (0 and 10 ppm ractopamine) for 35 days. Over the first 14 days of the study when the restriction was greatest, daily gain was greater in pigs fed betaine (+8%, P = 0.04) and in boars (+12%, P = 0.005) but was not affected by ractopamine (P = 0.18). Lean deposition was greater in pigs fed betaine (+5%, P = 0.08) and in boars (+6%, P = 0.006) but was not affected by ractopamine (P = 0.57). However, there was an interaction (P = 0.03) between ractopamine and sex such that ractopamine increased lean deposition in gilts but not boars. Thus, betaine and ractopamine had additive effects on lean mass in gilts (+5.1 kg) but not boars. Fat deposition was less in pigs fed ractopamine (–8%, P = 0.05) and in boars (–17%, P < 0.001) but was not affected by betaine (P = 0.81). However, there was an interaction (P = 0.04) between dietary ractopamine and sex such that ractopamine decreased fat deposition in gilts (–14%) but not boars. In conclusion, dietary betaine and ractopamine may have additive effects on lean deposition and improve body composition in gilts but responses in boars are more equivocal.


Acknowledgements

Doug Kerton, Paul Eason, Wayne Brown, Matt Borg and Maree Cox are gratefully acknowledged for their technical assistance throughout this investigation.


References


Batterham ES, Murison RD (1981) Utilization of free lysine by growing pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 46, 87–92.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | [Verified 16 September 2008]

Suster D, Leury BJ, Ostrowska E, Butler KL, Kerton DJ, Wark JD, Dunshea FR (2003) Accuracy of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), weight and P2 back fat to predict whole body and carcass composition in pigs within and across experiments. Livestock Production Science 84, 231–242.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Suster D, Leury BJ, King RH, Mottram M, Dunshea FR (2004) Interrelationships between porcine somatotropin (pST), betaine, and energy level on body composition and tissue distribution of finisher boars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 983–990.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1