Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genetic correlations between early growth and wool production of crossbred ewes and their subsequent reproduction

R. A. Afolayan A , N. M. Fogarty A E , A. R. Gilmour A , V. M. Ingham B , G. M. Gaunt C and L. J. Cummins D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

B Agrisearch Services Pty Ltd, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

C Department of Primary Industries, Primary Industries Research, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.

D Department of Primary Industries, Primary Industries Research, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: neal.fogarty@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Animal Production Science 49(1) 17-23 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08088
Submitted: 7 March 2008  Accepted: 28 July 2008   Published: 5 January 2009

Abstract

Genetic correlations between reproductive and productivity traits of ewes and their early growth, wool production and worm resistance traits were estimated among 2460 crossbred ewes. The ewes were progeny of 74 maternal breed sires and mainly Merino dams. The ewes were born over 3 years and had three joinings with a total of 6824 ewe joining records. The reproductive and ewe productivity traits included: (i) fertility (ewes lambing per ewe joined); (ii) litter size (number of lambs born per ewe lambing); (iii) rearing ability or lamb survival (lambs weaned of lambs born for lambing ewes); (iv) number of lambs born (NLBj) per ewe joined; (v) number of lambs weaned (NLWj) per ewe joined; (vi) total litter weight weaned (TWWj) per ewe joined; and (vii) the component trait average lamb weaning weight in the litter (AWW). The growth traits included the weight of the ewe at birth (BWT), weaning (WWT) and postweaning (PWWT), as well as growth rate pre- and postweaning. The wool traits included greasy (GFW) and clean fleece weight (CFW), yield and average fibre diameter (FD) at their first adult shearing. Worm egg count (WEC) during their first year was also recorded. Bivariate mixed models analyses using ASReml procedures were used to estimate the genetic correlations. The genetic correlations between TWWj and growth traits were positive and moderate to high and ranged from 0.34 for BWT to 0.61 for PWWT. Those for the other composite reproductive traits were slightly lower and ranged from 0.27 to 0.54 for NLWj and from 0.07 to 0.46 for NLBj. The genetic correlations between the overall measures of reproduction (NLBj, NLWj and TWWj) and GFW, CFW and FD were negative and generally low to moderate (–0.21 to –0.52). The correlations were generally larger for NLBj than for NLWj and TWWj. The genetic correlations between the reproductive traits and WEC were close to zero, except between AWW and WEC (0.42). The phenotypic correlations between the reproductive traits and the growth, wool and WEC traits were all close to zero. The genetic correlations were generally favourable between ewe reproduction and growth, with early selection for traits such as WWT and PWWT likely to give some improvement in subsequent reproduction and ewe productivity. In contrast, there appears to be a slight antagonism between reproduction and wool production. This study provides estimates of genetic correlations from crossbred ewes that add to the limited knowledge of these parameters that will improve the accuracy of genetic evaluation and prediction of the outcomes from breeding programs for meat and wool objectives that include reproduction.

Additional keyword: heritability.


Acknowledgements

The MCPT was run by the NSW Department of Primary Industries, Department of Primary Industries Victoria and the South Australian Research and Development Institute with the generous financial support of Meat and Livestock Australia. Commonwealth funding through the Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation and its predecessor is also gratefully acknowledged. We also gratefully acknowledge the many other scientists, technical and other support staff at the various sites who have contributed to and supported the work over several years as well as the ram breeders who entered sires.


References


Adams NR, Briegel JR, Greeff JC, Bermingham EN (2006) Feed intake, body composition, and plasma metabolic hormones in Merino sheep that differ genetically in fleece weight or fibre diameter. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 27–32.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Afolayan RA, Fogarty NM, Ingham VM, Gilmour AR, Gaunt GM, Cummins LJ, Pollard T (2007a) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 3. Growth and carcass performance of second-cross lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 457–466.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Afolayan RA, Gilmour AR, Fogarty NM (2007b) Selection indexes for crossbred ewe reproduction and productivity. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 491–494. open url image1

Afolayan RA, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Ingham VM, Gaunt GM, Cummins LJ (2008) Reproductive performance and genetic parameters in first-cross ewes from different maternal genotypes. Journal of Animal Science 86, 804–814.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Bromley CM, Snowder GD, van Vleck LD (2000) Genetic parameters among weight, prolificacy, and wool traits of Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science 78, 846–858.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Bromley CM, van Vleck LD, Snowder GD (2001) Genetic correlations for litter weight weaned with growth, prolificacy, and wool traits in Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science 79, 339–346.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Brown DJ, Tier B, Ball AJ (2001) What does OVIS offer the Merino sheep breeder. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 525–528. open url image1

Cloete SWP, Gilmour AR, Olivier JJ, van Wyk JB (2004) Genetic and phenotypic trends and parameters in reproduction, greasy fleece weight and liveweight in Merino lines divergently selected for multiple rearing ability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 745–754.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cummins LJ, Fogarty NM, Hocking-Edwards J, Edwards N, Stafford J, Gaunt G (2002) The economic return from first-cross ewes is dependent on the genetic value of their sire. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 602–607. open url image1

Fogarty NM (1995) Genetic parameters for live weight, fat and muscle measurements, wool production and reproduction in sheep: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 63, 101–143. open url image1

Fogarty NM, Ingham VM, Gilmour AR, Cummins LJ, Gaunt GM, Stafford J, Hocking Edwards JE, Banks RG (2005a) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 1. Breed and fixed effects for birth and weaning weight of first-cross lambs, gestation length, and reproduction of base ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 443–453.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fogarty NM, Ingham VM, Gilmour AR, Cummins LJ, Gaunt GM, Stafford J, Hocking Edwards JE, Banks RG (2005b) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 2. Breed and fixed effects for post-weaning growth, carcass, and wool of first-cross lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 455–463.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fogarty NM, Ingham VM, McLeod L, Gaunt GM, Cummins LJ (2006a) Genetic resources to increase the profitability of crossbred lamb production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 799–802.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fogarty NM, Safari E, Gilmour AR, Ingham VM, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2006b) Wool and meat genetics – the joint possibilities. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 22–27. open url image1

Gilmour AR , Gogel BJ , Cullis BR , Thompson R (2006) ‘ASReml user guide. Release 2.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Hanford KJ, van Vleck LD, Snowder GD (2002) Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Columbia sheep. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3086–3098.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Hanford KJ, van Vleck LD, Snowder GD (2003) Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science 81, 630–640.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Hanford KJ, van Vleck LD, Snowder GD (2005) Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Rambouillet sheep. Small Ruminant Research 57, 175–186.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hanford KJ, van Vleck LD, Snowder GD (2006) Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trend for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Polypay sheep. Livestock Science 102, 72–82.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ingham VM, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Afolayan RA, Cummins LJ, Gaunt GM, Stafford J, Edwards JEH (2007) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 4. Genetic parameters first-cross animal performance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 839–846.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Naidoo P , Cloete SWP (2006) Genetic correlations between reproduction and wool traits in mature, reproducing Merino ewes. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, August, 2006’. Communication No. 05–15. (CD-ROM)

Okut H, Bromley CM, van Vleck LD, Snowder GD (1999) Genotypic expression at different ages. I. Prolificacy traits of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2357–2365.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2007a) Across population genetic parameters for wool, growth, and reproduction traits in Australian Merino sheep. 2. Estimates of heritability and variance components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 177–184. open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2007b) Genetic correlations among and between wool, growth and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 65–72.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

van Wyk JB, Fair MD, Cloete SWP (2003) Revised models and genetic parameter estimates for production and reproduction traits in the Elsenburg Dormer sheep stud. South African Journal of Animal Science 33, 213–222. open url image1

Vanimisetti HB, Notter DR, Kuehn LA (2007) Genetic (co)variance components for ewe productivity traits in Katahdin sheep. Journal of Animal Science 85, 60–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1